Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comedy vs tragedy essay
Critical literary analysis of mother to son
Comedy vs tragedy essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comedy vs tragedy essay
vOn October 18, I saw the play Oedi at hialeah sr. highschool. The playwright of the play is by Rich Orloff. The director was shaira colon. The actors in the play were isabella romero, Julio cordero, Susana Martinez, Justin Alonzo ( I didn’t have the playbill so I couldn’t name the rest). The theme of the show was a retelling of oedipus in a comedic way. In the play two advisors tells oedi that he married his mother which concerns him.but later they all try to make up a cover story for oedi. I believe the story worked well because since it was a comedic play and i expected to laugh and did. The play was definitely interesting and entertaining. I never knew what to expect and didn't expect certain reactions like jocasta reaction to the confession.
In conclusion I think that the stage directions and dramatic irony are significant to the play, and without them there would be no need for a lot of the events that happen in the play.
This was quite an interesting story. There were three sections to the story which broke the story in three different times in one day. The characters were all very nonchalant except for the priest who showed some emotion when he found out that old Teofilo died. The story kept our interest, however, it did not lead a very clear trail to the end, and there was no real climax where we felt there was a good peak. The story needs to be read more than once to really be appreciated.
...ead the play or who has assisted to play in person. Oedipus blinding himself at the end of play proves his innocence and that he is misfortunate to be the man who was able to solve the Sphinx's riddle and the man who became Jocasta's husband committing incest by doing so. Oedipus committing the crime against his own father
In Sophocles’ tragic drama Oedipus the King, Oedipus, the king of Thebes, suddenly realizes that he killed his father and marries his mother. Oedipus shows great concern for his kingdom and his people, calling to “drive the corruption from the land” by bringing Laius’s murderer to justice (109). He summons Tiresias to find Laius’ murderer, but Oedipus becomes enraged when Tiresias accuses Oedipus of being the murderer. Oedipus, thinking that Creon is involved in this so-called conspiacy as well makes false accusations against Creon. Much to his surprise, however, Oedipus learns that the man he killed long ago is Laius, his father, and that Oedipus’ wife, Jocasta, is his mother, all in accordance with the prophecy that he had heard long before. After coming to this realization as well, Jocasta commits suicide. Oedipus gouges out his eyes after this episode and laments his birth. Although Oedipus strives to be a fair and just king by seeking Laius’ murderer, he is often not fair to his people. Also, by lamenting his birth, Oedipus blames whoever saved him for the pain he experiences. The play demonstrates the theme of injustice through Oedipus’ lament of his birth and Oedipus’ denial of justice to others—namely, Tiresias and Creon.
Due to this it is essential to cast and actor able to employ a strong and confident acting style as failure to do this would take away from Oedipus ' fall from omnipotence and his idol status upon Thebes. In a production by Jonathan Wilson at Hartford Stage Company, N.Y., Oedipus was successfully appropriated to a contemporary African context, however criticized for casting Reg Flowers (Oedipus). 'He 's Oedipus the Prince/ who doesn 't have layers of self-certainty to be peeled off slowly and inevitably away as his heritage and his faith are revealed to him ' This demonstrates how setting doesn 't play an integral part in delivering tragic elements contained in Oedipus, as often even minimalism design is used, but the strength in delivering the dialogue as it is part of the characterization of Oedipus. The use of dramatic irony when Oedipus refuses to accept the unfavorable truth illuminates the hubris he possesses. When told by the blind prophet Teresias that he is the murderer he has been seeking he insults him by
Worthen, W. B. (2000). Oedipus the King. The Harcourt Brace anthology of drama (3rd ed., pp.
I liked the play, because I believe this play was very mature and feminism was one of the themes in that play that was some how accepted.
Overall, I enjoyed this play. Even with the dull ending, I found it to be entertaining and a good use of my time. The cast was great and they made good use of a decent
Even so, both scholars and theater critics praised the dramatic structure and impact of the play itself, and audiences have received it enthusiastically. The drama isn't intended to be a biography; it's a powerful story of envy, obsession and betrayal, using historical figures and anecdotes as springboards for timeless messages.
It was good setting to get the attention from the audience and also a way to move around or change settings of the play. Although I love this play my small critic for this play was the players. Some others actors had understandable accents but others didn’t. For example, the brother of the servant his accent was confusing because he kept switching his accent from different country languages. This play was really nice it had a little of bit of everything drama, comedy, romance, betrayal. What like about this play it was how they used the dramatic structure the inciting incident and the climax. The inciting incident for this play of musical comedy murders of 1940 was guessing who the killer of the play was because there was tension building up not knowing who the murder was. The climax for this play would be for me finding out who was the murder and just being in shock how everything had change into a new scenario. Overall it was amazing show how it developed and how well an organized transition the play
As the story unfolds, a whole cast of puzzling characters is introduced in a gradual sequence stressing the degree of the complexity of the tangled events. In this respect, Oedipus discovers the death of the king of Thebes Laius; whose murderer he will know towards the end of the play. As a youngster Oedipus had been able to protect Thebes against the Sphinx. Additionally, the Oracle had predicted that Oedipus would marry
I found the concept of the play to be quite interesting. I learned new things about Martin Luther King such as his smoking habit and that he was a womanizer, both of
I had a great and wonderful time while this play because the author used very unrealistic ideas to create his play. William Shakespeare is a great writer and his plays are always good because he is one of the greatest writers of all time. This play was mind blowing and very instructive and it obvious that this play is written by a creative mind. Shakespeare has never or would never deceive me when it comes to a book. Also, his plays are always meaningful, constructive and usually send powerful messages. Although, the author is a famous writer, I found his books easy to understand because his plays are mostly not too mysterious. Although, his writing is sometimes weird and crazy, they are never in any way confusing. Even if, I struggle to understand the play at the beginning, I found my way back by the time I reached the end because his books are most of the time self-explanatory. Furthermore, I think this play was also a success because this play was really funny, but it was also emotional. Since the main themes of this play are: love, dream, and magic. I think I have learned many lessons from those themes and I have found also a connection with the thing that happen within the world around me related to this play in many ways. First of all, I have learned that there is more to love rather than physical attraction and also that if something is not
I didn't understand the story at all. I mean the angels were trying to rebel against god and that's basically all I know. I didn't understand what the play was about. I think the play wasn't to clear on what they were trying to get to the audience. All they did was talk. I didn't get involved into the play. It didn't get my attention. The relationships between the characters were pretty clear because there weren't to many actors in this play. I really didn't like this play. If I knew that this wasn't a mandatory assignment for my theatre class, and I went to view it because someone said it was a good play, I would've killed him. I have some kind of hate and vengeance towards this play. I just really hated it. I hated everything about it.
Consider the end of the play, the lack of resolution in the Bonario - Celia relationship, the class based difference in the severity of Volpone and Mosca`s punishments, the situation in which Corbaccio, Voltore and Corvino are left. Do you find the ending just and in structure or are the unresolved situations disturbing?