Non Directive Therapy Essay

There is evidence to support both directive and non-directive practices, though the data suggests that, in general, both extremes should be avoided (Cooper, 2008, pg.154). Critically discuss this statement.

In Cooper’s statement we are informed that there is evidence to support both directive and non-directive psychotherapeutic practice and this follows with a caution that the data suggests that practicing from an extreme of either polarity should be avoided. In order to critically discuss Cooper’s statement, I will begin by attempting a clearer understanding of the terms directive & non- directive. If as the data suggests we should avoid working from a polarity of either directive or non- directive approaches, where then does this leave

Rather than stand in an absolutist fashion adhering to their preferred approach, they are integrating the common factors approach into their own therapeutic framework. According to Sprenkle and Blow, (2004) directive or non- directive techniques are only important as vehicles through which the therapist can draw on common factors.

Carl Rogers first mentioned non- directiveness in his 1942 publication of ‘Client Centred Therapy’. Rogers, the founder of Non- Directive Therapy having become disillusioned with the more directive techniques of diagnoses and interpretation, moved away from the formal, detached role of the therapist. Thorne, (1992) Rogers believed that therapy should take place in a supportive egalitarian environment created by a close personal relationship between client and therapist and introduced the term "client" rather than "patient". Rogers, (1951)

Non-directive therapy also known as Person Centered Therapy or Client Centered Therapy, places much of the responsibility for the treatment process on the client, with the therapist taking a non-directive role. The concept of non- directivity can be confusing and does not mean that the therapy has no direction. Rather that the direction of therapy comes from the client. Joseph,