Night Funeral In Harlem Analysis

1379 Words3 Pages

Death is eventual for everyone. Therefore, this "end of all" event is a subject considered by many authors. This means there are thousands upon thousands of different forms of writings considering the subject all over the internet and in stores. Two of these writings are the poems, "I Have a Rendezvous With Death," by Alan Seeger and "Night Funeral in Harlem," by Langston Hughes. These two poems consider death in ways that are both similar and very different. Despite these poems being written nearly thirty years apart, there are many similarities in the two works. Each poem makes use of a tone in which the narrator ponders death in a way that does not seem afraid or bitter, a manner in which most would consider death. In "I Have a Rendezvous With Death," the narrator considers life in a peaceful form. He does not …show more content…

He paints a picture of spring time to further the contrast of life and death in his poem. On the other hand, in "Night Funeral in Harlem," the author uses small words and short sentences to be very brief about what he is talking about. He uses short language and minimal imagery, leaving the feeling of the poem like he wants the reader to imagine the funeral, bare minimum and definitely lacking. However, the imagery he does use is that of a very decent funeral; he mentions all the things you'd expect to be at the funeral even if the dead man was very poor. He explains this by saying things like "Yet they got a satin box/for his head to lay" and "That wreath of flowers," but the only detailed bit of imagery that he gives is "That long black hearse done sped/The street light/At his corner/Shined just like a tear." The rest of the poem has little description of how things look. Because of all these reasons, "I Have a Rendezvous With Death" and "Night Funeral in Harlem" are different. In conclusion, death is an important topic for many

Open Document