Figurative Language In Gordon Parks The Funeral

1508 Words4 Pages

As Lindsay Wagner once said, “When we shift our perception, our experience changes.” (Lindsay Wagner) Similarly, in the “The Funeral” by Gordon Parks, the speaker matures, realizing the beauteous environment he once saw is nothing more than a couple streams, hills, and dirt roads. As a child, he remembers being in awe while looking upon the stunning world around him. He saw everything through an elegant eye valuing it almost more than life itself. However, when the speaker returns home “after many snows,” (Parks, line 1) his surroundings didn’t have nearly the same effect on him. The magical place that brings elation to his childhood no longer exists. In its place, the speaker now sees gently trickling streams where raging rivers once were, …show more content…

When the speaker refers to his childhood, he exaggerates everything he sees. For example, mere hills were great mountains, trickling streams were raging rivers, and a withered path of dust was a wide road leading to anywhere in the world. The speaker does this in order to allow the reader to see how differently he viewed everything as a child. Also, the speaker overstates his father when he declares, “Only the giant who was my father/remained the same./A hundred strong men strained beneath his coffin.” (Parks, lines 10-12) By comparing his father to a giant who needs a hundred strong men to carry him to his grave, the speaker amplifies how much his father meant to him. Throughout the poem, Gordon Parks uses a hyperbolic tone to both magnify how the speaker’s view of the world changed and emphasize the importance of his father.
“The Funeral” is written as a free verse; this means that Gordon Parks does not have limits to certain words or specific syllable amounts while writing the poem. This allows the reader to feel the speaker’s personal thoughts and breath patterns without them being changed to fit a certain rhyme or rhyme scheme. As a result, it is simpler to empathize with the speaker because it’s easier to relate to how he feels. Additionally, the reader can receive a more detailed picture of both the speaker’s past and present environments, allowing them to more clearly visualize the speaker’s change in

Open Document