Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast books and movies
Similarities and differences between movies and books
Similarities and differences between movies and books
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast books and movies
Typically, two sides of a story exist. One that is common and most have heard, and then the more truthful story that not many know. The quote “Never judge a book by its movie” by J.W. Eagan might be leaning toward this idea. It can be hard for some people to listen to the full story because he or she only believes what is in front of them. For most, what is in front of them is a screen or a book cover. An attention grabber is needed and artists use this to their advantage to lure people into watching or reading a particular piece of media. A book or people should not be based upon the media adaptations. Not everybody takes the time to read the first few pages of a new book, or read the synopsis on the back. Many look a the picture on the front …show more content…
Wagan in a more literal stance, a book is never the same as a movie. A movie company may own the rights to a book, but if someone reads the story and then watches the movie, it would be like reading the book again. Same goes for seeing a movie and then reading the book. A movie is on average two and a half hours long; in comparison the average book is about three hundred to four hundred pages long. A book is going to contain more detail than a script containing between one hundred to one hundred and fifty pages. Subsequently, there is more to the story than what is being shown in a movie; not enough time is allotted to rewrite an entire book into a script. For the most part, people like seeing some of their favorite scenes acted out in a movie, but you still want the suspense of a plot twist. The movie should still gain interest from people that have yet to read the story. A movie is meant to change the story slightly and be different than the book. A book is meant to give all the details and explanations. Therefore, watching a movie based upon a book is not a realistic way to understand the …show more content…
It is easier to get a quick glance of a situation rather than hearing the entire story from the person. A realistic example is celebrities; they are given a platform to demonstrate his or her feelings and express themselves to the world. Most of celebrities’ actions are taken out of context and used to sell magazines. In a way, the tabloids are taking the true story; the book; and using it to make a better story with more exaggeration and putting it on a screen for easier access; a movie. For most celebrities this can be damaging because the viewers only see their lives through a screen. The celebrity only looks as good as the picture on the screen because about 80.8 percent of media news come from the radio and approximately 56.7 percent comes from television (Philippine Statistics Authority, 2001). Viewers and fans are listening to other people and agreeing with the judgements, whereas readers get the full story and make his or her own
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
Movies based on books try to captivate the audience while staying true to the story.
As celebrities stand distinctively among the masses and cast out their halos of personality charm and strong suits of skilled abilities, the controversies about them are unavoidable shadows created from their fame. With the popularization of celebrity culture, information synchronization, and communication technology, their lives are publicly exposed and various forms of media (depending on eras) record their flaws. Tough information transmitted to audiences are frequently biased, evidences of objective reality remains, even in the remote past.
First of all, the movie is concise and more meaningful than the original book. Take an easy example of Macbeth, the movie
In conclusion, books and their movies are never the same. This tenet is known to cause some serious controversy in the secret world of fandoms, the community of people who are dedicated lovers of the same books, movies, TV shows, or any other form of media. John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men is a great example of the changes that differentiate between a novel and the book, as seen above. This book and its movie have obvious changes between the characters, the plot, and dialogue. These things are picked up in practically every book and its movie adaptation. Because of this, there are various discrepancies amongst enthusiasts debating whether the movie outshines the book, or vice versa. But it is all up to you to decide: Do apples taste better, or do oranges?
...iduals who recognize and believe this incident to be very real, and people who ignore it as propaganda, generating the whole story collectively, and ensuring the thinking and perception of the reader.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
Second there is more detail in the book than the movie. Well, I think that more detail is better because the more you know the better you understand the movie or
A movie that came out in 2002 was Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. This movie was based off the best-selling novel, which was written in 1997 by J.K. Rowling, called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. If you were to read this book and watch the movie you would find many differences, but the main difference between the two is that the book gives more information to the reader than the movie gives to the viewer. If someone was to watch the movie instead of reading the book, that person would not be able to have an accurate perception of the book because so many things in the book are changed in the movie or parts are left out of the movie completely. This is mainly because the book has more characters and chapters, which are able to keep the reader informed and interested. Still, the movie is shorter so that people who want a quick summary of the storyline can get it,
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
As stated before, it is understandable that it is more convenient to experience a story that has been adapted to a medium that allows more free time such as movies. Even if the movie does not follow the book word-by-word, most of the time it is great to enjoy a movie without worrying too much about the adaptation. However, experiencing life through the limited perspective of movies is a terrible way to
Many people around the world are reading their favorite books, savoring each page of them. Books that become popular enough get transformed into movies for the fans to enjoy. Some movies are really close to being spot on. If that's the case, there would be little to no differences between the book and the movie. However, many movies have many differences from the book. The book, Maze Runner, is an example of a book that's been transformed into a film. While this specific book and movie have many similarities, there are some minor differences between the two.
As stated numerous times throughout this essay, movies must stay true to their book predecessor for full effect. Books are normally beautifully described and written, and help the reader visualize a completely new world. Most movies, not just The Book Thief, normally omit several
According to Epstein, a celebrity is something or someone who can be talented and full of achievements and yet wish to broadcast ones fame further through the careful cultivation of celebrity, while one can be the total opposite of achievements and be less talented and yet still be made seem otherwise through the mechanics and dynamics of celebrity creation (Epstein2). Celebrity culture today is epidemic; some might agree that it is sweeping up America in a harmful way, while one might argue that it is beneficial to our society. Over the last few decades, celebrity and fame has changed dramatically, from Alexander the Great to Kim Kardashian. Talent and achievements no longer play a huge role when it comes to celebrities. “Much modern celebrity seems the result of careful promotion or great good looks or something besides talent and achievement” (Epstein2) with that being said celebrity-creation has blossomed into an industry of its own.... ...
Also, books usually have more characters and give continued suspense so that the reader will be hooked or addicted to finish the book to find out the story. On the other hand, movie producers need to eliminate so many details about the story in order to squeeze everything into one to two hours. Due to this, those people who love detail information about stories usually prefer books than movies as movies does not have a detailed information about the story. Furthermore, reading books can not only enhance the reader’s vocabulary and creativity, but also increase their reading and writing skills, while watching movies only provides entertainment (Lee, wordpress.com).