Negative Effects Of Neoliberalism

874 Words2 Pages

There is significant criticism against neoliberalism and mainly its effect on people in the global South. Neoliberalism, as a wide-ranging form of economic liberalization ranging from policies to organizations and businesses means there will always be down sides to certain advances. For the most part, critics argue that neoliberal policies are causing more harm than good, but it is a complex issue as there are many positive outcomes of neoliberalism. The question of whether the positive aspects of neoliberalism overrule the negative aspects and limitations is remains a crucial topic that must be analyzed.
Neoliberal policies do not benefit everyone and all countries. An example of this is the fact that wealth is not distributed equally within …show more content…

These organizations, mainly the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) have positive goals and objectives but also have their limitations. Dani Rodrick, author of The Globalization Paradox believes open markets only succeed if they follow social, political, and legal institutions. Less developed nations have lower developed rights and institutions, meaning their governments do not have enough power to control neoliberalism in the country resulting in greater risk for international lenders and businesses. These countries also find it difficult to meet the requirements needed to receive aid from these organizations because organizations such as the IMF give countries terms that they cannot met because they do not have the resources. Therefore, forcing developing countries to surrender their sovereignty since they are forced to enforce policies against their will and abilities. This also means that developing countries usually have less privileged access to international markets than countries in the global North such as the United States. Rodrick also points out that countries in the global South, including the United States do not want to give up sovereignty but expects developing countries to do that for them. Consequently, developing countries should have better protection against international markets since they are quite often …show more content…

These corporations include Nike, Walmart and many more, these businesses function in multiple countries which can bring some issues as well as benefits. Multinational Corporations are involved in a great deal of corporate social responsibly(CSR) projects which means they strive to adhere so ethnical and social norms. In addition to CSR, multinationals provide a large number of jobs in developing countries in their factories, call centers, etc. Revenue in developing countries due global trade also increases which is a benefit. However, this triggers corruption and violations of regulations because governments are more concerned with higher GDPs and development rather than regulations restricting these large corporations. An example of this is the unsafe working conditions, as a result thousands of workers die or are injured because they are not given correct clothing and safety gear to work the machines. Another concern is factory audits are not legitimate, and managers improve conditions or hide certain workers when it is time for inspections. In order for free markets to work correctly and in a socially adequate manner, countries hosting multinationals should be harsher and consistent with

Open Document