Nature Vs. Nurture In Mark Twain's Pudd Nhead Wilson

1100 Words3 Pages

Mark Twain expresses and displays the reality of the vigorous debate of nature versus nurture in his novel, Pudd’nhead Wilson, through the development of one of the main characters, Tom. In addition to tossing ideas around of nature versus nurture, Twain also does the same in terms of other societal issues that still exist even in modern society, such as gender roles and racism. Yet, through both Tom’s and Chamber’s upbringings and resulting attitudes shown towards the end of the novel, Twain shows that how a person is raised, their privilege, or lack thereof, and their surrounding environment affects their future personality and attitude towards others. Considering all these factors, it is obvious that a person grows up to be an adult that …show more content…

Twain supports this idea by arguing that how a person is brought up often affects their entire life, seeing as how the majority of life-changing decisions occur in one’s childhood. Throughout the beginning of the novel, Tom’s lavish upbringing was one of luxury, which is telling later on in his resulting attitudes. Considering his socioeconomic status, and his family’s accumulated wealth, his childhood was one of stereotypical, wealthy, aristocratic, 1830’s, white child. One example of this is seen on page 17 of the novel, “Tom got all the petting, Chambers got none. Tom got all the delicacies, Chambers got mush and milk, and clabber without sugar.” Here Twain displays how extravagant Tom’s childhood was in comparison to Chambers. By including this set of details in the storyline, it shows that a person’s race affects their daily lives and routines, eventually shaping their future. Tom was fed delicacies and prepared meals, while Chambers received only enough food to keep him strong in order so that he can eventually work the fields on the plantation, since he was a slave. This also displays how Chambers was considered and treated as subhuman and property, given his race and extremely low social status in the early to mid 1800’s. Another example of how an upbringing shapes a person’s …show more content…

This is obviously displayed through both Tom’s privilege and Chamber’s absence of it. Seen on page 16, “Tom was a bad boy from the very beginning of his usurpation,” this shows that ever since he was born and put into a position of power over Chambers and the other slaves, he took advantage of it, and did whatever he wanted, just because he could. Chambers lack of privilege is shown vividly through page 18 in the novel, “[Percy Driscoll] told Chambers that under no provocation whatever was he privileged to lift his hand against his little master.” This explicitly displays Tom’s power over Chambers and how he is considered a “little master,” and how Chambers was not allowed to even lift a hand against Tom, given his subhuman reputation due to his ethnicity and race. While privilege in modern society is still defined by social and economic status, race and ethnicity nowadays doesn’t play as big of a role as it did in determining privilege in the early to

Open Document