Nando's Flawed My Intellectual Property-Artist

1071 Words3 Pages

Nando’s stole my intellectual property - artist (Article 1) Summary of the article: Nando’s is accused of supposedly using an artist’s image without permission. Anthony Bila (photographer) posted on Facebook that Nando’s used his image, although he wasn’t sure if it was a copy right violation as Nando’s changed the original photo, he tried contacting Nando's but got no response. An attorney has stated that if the artist’s image has been used, they must pay him or it is illegal. Nando’s response about the allegation, is that they are investigating, and if necessary they will remove the image. Some are angered by these claims as part of Nando’s marketing and decor strategy is actively supporting South African artists. Topic of article and impact …show more content…

The lawsuit allegedly accuses McDonald’s of firing many black workers at once who “didn’t fit the profile”. The lawsuit filed displays nine African-American and one Hispanic worker charging McDonald’s of uncontrolled sexual and racial harassment and unjustified termination by supervisors. McDonald’s supervisors have been calling black and Hispanic workers bad names, suggesting to have oral sex with employees, inappropriately touching employees and sending workers pictures of their genitals. The company took no action towards what their supervisors were doing. Lisa McComb, McDonald’s spokeswomen, claims McDonald’s have not seen the lawsuit and cannot comment on the allegations. In a statement released by McDonald’s, they claim to have embraced the diversity of employees for many years, and discrimination is not in line with their values. The National Labour Relations Board feel that corporations should be held responsible and not franchises. Topic of article and impact on business: Workers’ rights - As McDonald’s is an international brand this will have an international harmful effect on McDonald’s as people feel very strongly about any form of discrimination against workers. If the allegations are proven true, customers will not feel comfortable supporting McDonald’s, leading in a loss in profit and customers. It could also lead to workers in other franchises …show more content…

Subway’s actual chicken percentage ranges from 54% to 43%. It was also seen that Subways non-chicken products were mostly soy. Subway disagrees with these results, but don’t question the lab, but instead promised to speak with their suppliers. It is not the first time a fast-food place has been caught being devious with what they put in their food. This is more of a public embarrassment for Subway, then anything shocking as all the chemicals used are

More about Nando's Flawed My Intellectual Property-Artist

Open Document