Moral Dilemmas In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

742 Words2 Pages

This or That Right vs Wrong and Good vs Bad… We are faced with moral dilemmas every day, some are more difficult than others but it is all based on our preferences. It's what we think we should do while we are being forced to choose between two actions. All of the characters through Of Mice and Men, The Crucible, and The Dark Knight undergo situations and have their own way of doing the right thing. Out of all the characters, the dilemmas dealt with by Of Mice and Men characters were the most heartfelt. While, Batman had the toughest dilemmas.
In Of Mice and Men Candy faces a moral dilemma with dog, to let it keep suffering or let Carlson take care of it. Candy’s dog was the only thing that kept him company, and happy. When Carlson came in the bunkhouse and smelt the dog, he told Candy that he thinks the dog would be better of dead. “This ol’ dog suffers hisself all the time” (Steinback 49) since he was so old. So, Carlson took care of the dog and shot him were “he wouldn't feel nothing” (Steinback 50) . Candy made a good choice letting the dog go so it wouldn't suffer any longer. In Of Mice and Men Lennie faces a moral dilemma of listening to George and fight Curley back or keep his composure and get beat up. Of course he didn't want to fight back because he is so kind …show more content…

He was faced to let the Joker murder a person everyday he didn't come forward or risk his secret identity and the people in his life get killed. While Joker and Batman were arguing Batman asks why Joker hasn't just killed him yet, and Joker was basically saying because it wouldn't be fun, so Batman says “You’re garbage. You kill for money.” Which is true, Batman is there to save innocent people and get rid of the criminals like the Joker. Batman decides to still keep his identity a secret. Batman should have just came forward so that innocent people wouldn't have had to

Open Document