Mlk And Edwards Rhetorical Analysis

1092 Words3 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr., an American Baptist minister and leader in the African-American Civil Rights Movement, spoke out to eight clergymen about why not standing with him during this time of discrimination is ultimately an unwise choice if they want to consider themselves “men of God.” Likewise, Jonathan Edwards, one of the most powerful and persuasive Puritan preachers, spoke out to everyone in the countless communities he visited to convince them that it is vital to recommit their life to God. Both MLK and Edwards pieces are effective. An effective piece is a piece that keeps a single focus and successfully convinced an audience to adopt the author's point of view. MLK and Edwards share a sophisticated use of the same techniques to persuade …show more content…

In his piece, MLK compares the body of Christ and the church to emphasize the idea that the clergymen are doing more harm than good by being nonconformists. MLK states, “Yes, I see the church as the body of Christ. But, oh! How we have blemished and scarred that body through social neglect and through fear of being nonconformists” (Shea, Pg. 271). MLK encourages the idea that the clergymen are supposed to be men of God and that they should be doing everything humanly possible to become more “Christ-like”; however, by neglecting to acknowledge segregation as an issue-they are doing more harm than good. In the same fashion, Edwards convinces the reader that they should be grateful God has graced them from eternal damnation by comparing the listeners to being “heavy as lead.” Edwards states ““Your wickedness makes you as it were heavy as lead, and to tend downwards with great weight and pressure towards hell” (Edwards). Edwards compares the reader to being as “heavy as lead” to illustrate that they should express their gratitude to God for bearing their “heaviness” and saving them from Hell. MLK’s use of figurative language falls to be inferior to Edwards’ use. Edwards’ use of figurative language creates a more effective essay because Edwards directly compares the audience to something, pushing them to relate more closely to Edwards’ argument, rather than MLK who indirectly states that the clergymen are blemishing the “body of christ” by social

Open Document