Lou Gehrig Rhetorical Analysis

566 Words2 Pages

Lou Gehrig was able to write a successful rhetorically effective speech. Gehrig was able to use his honest personality and character, which allowed him to establish credibility. Next, Gehrig was successful in reasoning that he has an awful lot to live for and he shares a personal experience that touches the reader emotionally. Gehrig created a successful rhetoric speech. Gehrig emotionally affected the reader when he only expressed himself, and not another person or character. This emphasized his speech because his credibility is began to develop and you assume that his words are spoken from his heart. He then begins to touch the audiences with the fact that he was diagnosed with ALS, but he was still able to play baseball regardless of the diagnose. This …show more content…

The first fact that he mentioned was that he played baseball for seventeen years. Next, Gehrig mentions that he “never received anything but kindness and encouragement from you fans.” Gehrig was able to concede that yes, he was diagnosed with ALS, and yes he received a bad break, but on the bright side, he refuted by mentioning that he still has an awful a lot to live for. Gehrig also begins to use emotional diction to augment his words to make it more powerful; he first mentions, “Which of you wouldn’t consider it the highlight of his career just to associate with them [the grand men] for even one day?” This questions allows your personal feelings and thoughts to think about the question, and then you start to agree. Next, he continues the speech by mentioning famous people, “Who wouldn’t consider it an honor to have Known Jacob Ruppert? Also, the builder of baseball’s greatest empire, Ed Barrow.” Each question presented, influenced the reader’s thought to agree, to rationalize that yes, it is amazing that you were able to meet people that are reputable, in high areas. Gehrig was able to express his pathos

Open Document