Misleading Or Deceptive

2233 Words5 Pages

Misleading and Deceptive According to ASIC (2012), misleading or deceptive are issuers of notes who fail to comply with the advertising standards risk making false or misleading statement or engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct in contravention of the Corporations Act or ASIC Act . A person must not in trade or commerce, engage in conduct, in relation to financial service that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive . Contravention is not an offence. The consumer can use Section 12DA to sue ANZ for creating misleading advertisement and promotion, making false predictions about future matters, creating a false impression about nature, suitability or financial product and withholding the relevant and important information. …show more content…

RG 234 applies to promoters and provider of financial services and product. It covers all the products that are licensed to provide and recommend to clients and also all the financial planning service. ASIC have the power to certify that all advertising is done with a transparent, ethical manner and well balanced. However, serious penalties and remedies can be incurred for misleading advertising. Besides, RG 234 is applying to any communication that intend to financial services or product . It will influence those who advertise their product with brochure, newspaper and social media. Case 1: 14-058MR ASIC Concerns about ANZ advertising Facts ASIC believed ANZ were not insufficiently prominent to ensure that consumers would not misled while these conditions were disclosed in the advertisement. The consumer may have been misled by the advertisement when applying for income protection insurance where Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ). The advertisement for income protection insurance with a bonus of $100 ANZ Visa Gift Card that ran in newspaper and online. However, ANZ was held that the terms of offer did not meet qualification unless they maintain their policy and had breached the Section 12 …show more content…

In this case, Woolworths Limited has provided consumers with financial product as the consumer purchase the car insurance product with Woolworths Limited, which is specifically included under section 764. Outcome Under RG 234, the product should have sufficiently similar features for Woolworths to make the comparison relevant and not misleading when comparing products in an advertisement. The more that a qualification is required to balance the information contained in the headline claim, the clearer and more prominently placed that qualification should be. Woolworths Limited should compare its product in advertisement with same category of other products. Case 3: 12-153MR RAMS changes advertising in response to ASIC concerns

Open Document