Minority Stress Model

916 Words2 Pages

To answer the questions posed by the literature review, several articles were chosen to inform a study that was more synergistic in nature instead of experimental, spanning the fields of feminism, sociology, psychology, and anthropology. They provided two theoretical frameworks for racially driven stress the Minority Stress Model or the Acculturative Stress. The minority stress model is primarily found in LGBT literature describes a conflict between minority and majority values that leads to psychological distress and then poor health outcomes (Dentato, 2012). Meanwhile, the Acculturative Stress model is usually used in the context of Latino immigration and cultural dispersion, it describes the stresses and conflicts brought from entry into …show more content…

A jeopardy in itself is a potential vulnerability, a discrete vulnerable identity an individual may be a part of. “Additive jeopardy,” or double jeopardy or triple jeopardy, posits that multiple vulnerable identity statuses add risk and burden in an additive nature. Meanwhile, multiple jeopardy posits that the vulnerability of multiple identities interacts in an interdependent and multiplicative nature. The issue is that these two competing theoretical narratives have decided how minority status is perceived in study design and analysis for the field with the additive jeopardy model being the prevailing theme and limited research to bimodal experiments such as “SES in black men” or “Cardiovascular health in low-SES Asians.” The study Using Multiple-Hierarchy Stratification and Life Course Approaches to Understand Health Inequalities: The Intersecting Consequences of Race, Gender, SES, and Age by Tyson H. Brown et. al attempts to challenge this assertion by taking a multiple-hierarchy approach that conducts both in-group and out-group analysis. Their study found that poor self-rated health values track in multiplicative nature with the addition of vulnerable identities, ergo black, impoverished, women have the worst health outcomes, but however, the data does not …show more content…

While primarily focused on the ability of individuals to conform to professional roles, the theory of role strain can be easily extended to situations as being a minority in the workplace, an academic field, a neighborhood, a district, a city, or a nation that has its own prevailing culture. It accounts for many different roles situated within minority status, “housewife,” “single mother,” “affirmative hire,” “charity case,” “flamboyant friend,” and etc. However the measures of role strain leave an unprecedented possible for simplicity. If a measure was to be created that can account for the number of perceived roles, the multiplicative addition of stress and health outcomes, the issues of the social categorization and biological construction of minority statuses such as race, sexuality, and/or gender identifying fall to the

Open Document