1. What is the difference between a metropolitan area and a megaregion? What is the significance of those difference(s)?
A metropolitan area and a megaregion both arch over many people and communities, but they are two very different entities. A Metropolitan area as defined by the federal government is an area that reaches across urban communities and a city, which also has 50,000 people or more living there. A Megaregion in contrast is an area that arches over multiple cities, urban communities, counties, and sometimes even states. A megaregion is essentially multiple metropolitan areas all bunched together. The difference between these two types of areas can be seen when examine the governments in each. In a Metropolitan areas coordinating policies ion things like transportation can be difficult because of the many layers of government in the region. A Megaregion experiences those same issues on an exponentially larger scale. Sometimes hundreds or thousands of jurisdictions overlap creating conflict and little to no organization and coordination. The mere difference in overlaps of governments makes a significant difference between a metropolitan area and a
…show more content…
In the Tiebout Model instead of creating regional governments, instead micro political jurisdictions are made that do not overlap. These regions can offer specific services and taxes to best fit certain citizens, but if this area is not working the citizens can move to a more effective and efficient micro political jurisdiction. This theory of government only would work with informed and mobile citizens. Since citizens in the U.S. are often uninformed about politics, this idea already would struggle to work. Also since certain jobs can only be found in specific areas as well as other factors citizens often are not fully mobile to move to different
“Could suburbs prosper independently of central cities? Probably. But would they prosper even more if they were a part of a better-integrated metropolis? The answer is almost certainly yes.” (p. 66)
In modern suburbs things like cul-de-sacs and tangle towns are more common to be designed with. This makes it virtually impossible to include a mass transit system into the suburb. Thus, more driving, more gas use, and more emissions created in the atmosphere. A common response to this from a suburban residential is that the city is jam packed with congestion and pollution from stop and go traffic. Yet with cities, they are more dense, highly populated and many of the stop and go traffic is created by workers who live in the suburbs coming into the city at rush hour. One thing that works well in a typical city is mass transit. Things like buses, subways and train systems work well with block by square block areas, but not so with winding curving neighborhoods such as in suburbs. Another reason why mass transit does not play a major roll in the life of one who lives in a suburb is that suburban commuting consists of many different directions and destinations. Where as in the city typical people are commuting into the downtown. A central destination such as a downtown keeps things more conveniently close, and since so many people are making the trip to one single common place then gas can be saved by major carpooling, or in other words mass transit.
The urban world is about things that are going on within the cities, and the differ...
Blij, H.J. de , Peter O. Muller, Jan Nijman, and Antoinette M.G.A WinklerPrins. The World Today Concepts and Regions in Geography. Fifth Edition ed. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011. Print.
States in areas such as urban population, employment and many other ways. The mass number of
Updated by Michael Porter, clusters are often varied forms according to local contexts and are far from being homogeneous: the reality of clusters identified or labelled as such in the world is complex and multifaceted. Methodological First, the success of the cluster concept in the absence of a clear definition makes it paradoxically increasingly blurred: everything becomes "cluster", when geographical concentration is observed activities of the same type or a network of highly innovative economic actors.
In an increasingly global world geography matters now more than ever. With so many groundbreaking technological advances within the last 50 years the world is rapidly evolving into a more interconnected and codependent society. These strides of advancement not only allow for international business interactions, but it allows instant communication to make business more cohesive. As a more interconnected society it is important for every person to understand the locations and cultural motivations of the people they interact with. These subject matters are suggested and discussed in “Why Geography Matters…More Than Ever!”
After the world war, to the suburban growth in the 1990s and it affects American greatly because it contributed to the economy growth of United State after the Second World War, some state in U.S like Texas New York, and Pennsylvania became the most famous cities in the united State in 1950s. American started to buy land in the country of the cities, to build a house that is cheap, and people were able to buy subsides low mortgages than renting an expensive apartment in the city.
Again, this section will give a working definition of the “urban question’. To fully compare the political economy and ecological perspectives a description of the “urban question” allows the reader to better understand the divergent schools of thought. For Social Science scholars, from a variety of disciplines, the “urban question” asks how space and the urban or city are related (The City Reader, 2009). The perspective that guides the ecological and the social spatial-dialect schools of thought asks the “urban question” in separate distinct terminology. Respected scholars from the ecological mode of thinking, like Burgess, Wirth and others view society and space from the rationale that geographical scope determines society (The City Reader, 2009). The “urban question” that results from the ecological paradigm sees the relationship between the city (space) as influencing the behaviors of individuals or society in the city. On the other hand...
There are three kinds of development in megacities we would like to explore in this paper, they are sustainable development, economic development and human development. Those kinds of development face many problems in megacities. In 1950 there were only New York and Tokyo as megacities and now in this 21 century the number of megacities are increasing.In 2013 noted there are 28 megacities (New Geography, 2013). Industrialization in developing countries is the main reason why the poor peasant in rural area moved to the cities in the name of better job and higher wages. This urbanization will change the population proportion which is decreasing the rural population and on the other side, increasing the population of urban areas. This continuing movement will inevitably create big and even bigger community in the city and in the end a megacity will be formed. This big number of population influences development of megacities.
Whoosh! That is the precise sound I heard as the crazed flock of travelers headed for the train terminal. My best friend, Stacy, and I were left disoriented and understandably confused once the crowd thinned. We were at Madison Square Garden at the train terminal awaiting our train back to the hotel; it was our first trip to New York City. As one may imagine, it was a fascinating and surreal voyage into extreme urban life. It was so enthralling and exciting that afterward I felt compelled to make a permanent trek to a large city. Due to my experiences in cities like Atlanta and New York, I have an increasing desire to live in a large city because of the various forms of entertainment, myriad of transportation, and the never-ending excitement typical of such a fast-paced lifestyle.
Working environments, for instance, vary among people who live in the cities and those in the country. City dwellers generally have a commute, sometimes a long, arduous and congested jaunt. Jobs are more plentiful in a city setting; however, the fast paced working environment in the city can cause great displeasure. Some would dispute, though, that it would be easier to get another job because the market is higher. Although I agree the job market is greater in the city, likewise, so is the number of prospective job seekers.
Urbanization is the process of becoming a city or intensification of urban elements. Since modernization, the meaning of urbanization mostly became the transformation that a majority of population living in rural areas in the past changes to a majority living in urban areas. However, urbanization differs between the developed and developing world in terms of its cause and the level of its negative outcomes. Korea, as one of the developing countries, experienced what is called ‘ overurbanization,’ and it experienced a number of negative consequences of it, although it could achieve a great economic development by it. This paper examines how urbanization differs between the West and the rest of the world, the characteristics and process of urbanization in Korea, problems sprung from its extreme urbanization, and government policies coping with population distribution.
The city was blinding me with shining lights that you could see from space. It was glistening in the night and dull by day. There were cars parked all alongside the streets and traffic jams every corner.
There are many definitions that refer to the term geography. You can take the technical term straight from a geography textbook that says, “Physical geography is the study of spatial distributions of phenomena across the landscape, processes that created and changed those distributions, and implications for those distributions on people.” While physical geography refers to the geography of the land, urban geography refers to the geography of the city. By definition urban geography is, “the sub-discipline of geography which concentrates on those parts of the Earth’s surface that have a high concentration of buildings and infrastructure.” Geography is not only a natural science though; it is a social science as well. When building a city and