Metamorphosis Essay

794 Words2 Pages

In Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis, Gregor Samsa's sudden transformation into a cockroach is appalling to all that encounter him, but none attempt to cure him of his affliction. The acceptance of his condition by Gregor and those around him highlights the underlying existentialist and absurdist perspective within the characters' attempt to come to terms with this circumstance. In the face of this dramatically absurd metamorphosis, Gregor does not blame a higher power, nor himself. As time wears on, he not only refrains from questioning his transformation but, at times lavishes in it and embraces it. His adjustment, and the adjustment of his family members, is not one of questioning his new life, but rather attempting to accept it for exactly what it is. In this way, Gregor and his family, particularly his father and sister, epitomize rationalization and freedom of choice in the face of absurdity. Prior to becoming an insect, Gregor's defines his existence in relationship to his role as the breadwinner, and finds purpose in diligently working to provide for his family. This imposed role requires him to get up very early, get on a train, and perform his tedious duties as a traveling salesman. When he awakens to find he has become a cockroach overnight, his sole concern is being on time for the train and continuing to perform his work tasks , as he does every other day, so that he may sustain his family. Upon first waking up, he begins to ponder his motivation for waking up early, commuting, and working very hard. He concludes, “If I didn't have to hold my hand because of my parents, I'd have given notice long ago.” By continuing to support his family, in order to pay off his parents' debts, he believes he will event... ... middle of paper ... ...ot a single mention of curing or treating Gregor, his condition is thus rationalized as mundane in relationship to absurdity. Thus, the irrationality, and Because Gregor is no longer capable of filling the role of "provider", his actions no longer define the lives of his family, and they are freed from inauthenticity by this revelation. Much like the philosophers of the existentialist movement, Gregor's family realizes that in the face of absurdity, the only choice one has is to define their own existence. As time wears on, Gregor's family becomes contemptuous of the burden which comes from caring for him and hiding him from the eyes of the public. In reaction to their contempt, each chooses to prevent Gregor's new dependent role from hindering their authenticity. The father feels a sense of renewed pride in once again being the head of the household.

Open Document