Metacognition, Self-Regulation And Self Regulated Learning

1240 Words3 Pages

Metacognition is a cognitive theory, defined as a leaner’s awareness of his or her own learning process. Grounded in constructivist theory, metacognition gained widespread prominence in the 1970s. Metacognition, or “thinking about thinking”, is not a clearly defined word. research on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning must be firmly connected with theory. As Winters et al. (2008) note, the lack of clear guiding conceptual frameworks in research studies creates confusion in terminology and leads researchers to use terms interchangeably. Thus, rather than asking how metacognition is involved during self-regulation, we end up asking whether metacognition is the same as self-regulation. Such definitional quandaries thwart …show more content…

(2008) show how other perspectives have influenced these fields. Researchers can choose their theoretical frameworks, and it is critical that they do so. Research that is not well linked with theory will be disconnected to other research and will not offer clear implications for educational policy and practice. (Kaplan, 2008) While there are competing theoretical models and some disagreement over how best to define the term and its constituent parts, it is generally agreed the topic of metacognition is concerned with metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive experience, and metacognitive regulation and monitoring. (Flavell, 1979; Hacker, Dunlosky, & Glaesser, 1998; McCormick, 2003; Zimmerman & Schunk, 2011; McLeod, 1997; Schneider & Lockl, 2002; Cross & Paris, 1988; Flavell, 1979; Paris & Winograd, 1990; Schraw & Moshman, 1995; Schraw et al., 2006; Whitebread et al., …show more content…

Many researchers distinguish between declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge types, with varying agreement on those distinctions (Cross & Paris, 1988; Kuhn, 2000; Schraw et al., 2006; Schraw & Moshman, 1995). Declarative knowledge is the factual information that one knows; it can be declared—spoken or written. An example is knowing the formula for calculating momentum in a physics class (momentum = mass times velocity). Procedural knowledge is knowledge of how to do something, of how to perform the steps in a process; for example, knowing the mass of an object and its rate of speed and how to do the calculation. Conditional knowledge is knowledge about when to use a procedure, skill, or strategy and when not to use it; why a procedure works and under what conditions; and why one procedure is better than another. For example, students need to recognize that an exam word problem requires the calculation of momentum as part of its solution. Metacognition Metacognitive knowledge is both having knowledge and having awareness of that knowledge. Metacognitive regulation is the procedural knowledge used to regulate cognitive processes and consists of four components, according to Brown (1987): planning, monitoring, evaluating, and revising. These components are not dependent on domain-specific and structural knowledge. (Wineburg, 2001) Metacognitive monitoring uses two different types

Open Document