More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of immigration on the economy
Immigration in american history 1880 1914
Immigration in american history 1880 1914
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of immigration on the economy
Taylor Wade HIST 104 10 November 2017 Word Count: 596 Melting Pot or Vegetable Soup The Unites States now, is a place of opportunity, that is assimilated and made up of different races, cultures, religions, etc. in which we once used to call “immigrants”. Within the 1800s and early 1900s, the place we all know and love, “America” was also then referred to as the Melting Pot. The term “Melting Pot” basically referred to the idea that all different kinds of people from a widespread of places came together to create one, and overtime, that’s exactly what happened to our country. In spite of the fact that some people, such as Bourne and Zangwill felt as if this was a substantial event that occurred within this time period, others, like Schultz disagreed and in fact, thought this was a careless idea that would soon corrupt the U.S. and all it had become. Throughout this time period, many people had a lot to say on whether or not they believed this would benefit or slowly create a downfall within our country and one of those people were Randolph …show more content…
He to believed, just the same as Bourne, that this was nowhere near a tragic event, but a fulfilling one that would bring many new opportunities to America. Within his document he stated “the real American has not yet arrived. He is only in the crucible. I tell you-he will be the fusion of all races, perhaps the coming superman,” (p.610) This quote to me seems as if, he is describing the actuality that he feels the “Melting Pot” phenomenon as a whole is going to bring to America. It almost appears that he is warning people that the “reality” aspect of it all is coming and compelling people to wait on it. I believe he says and does just this because he believes that the many different people coming from all over will create a different but realistic feel and bring everyone together, while evolving the U.S. along with
...s that he was unable to completely drive the Union forces from the South. His decisions to invade the north on two occasions were less than sound in many ways, and shows what I feel was wishful thinking on his part.
With the civil war coming to an end, the congressman of Illinois presented a fresh, new concept. This modern idea stated that the United States of America was a new nation and “for the first time, it had been wholly free.” Many of the white men from this time period were against the change and pursued their old way of life, which prevented the newly made amendments from going into full effect. Freedom in the south during the reconstruction era of America was very controversial. There were many different conceptions of what freedom was. It was thought to be land, others thought it had to do with money, and some even though it was not having a master/not being a slave. The definition of freedom swayed back and forth depending on whose point of
Perhaps the three most influential men in the pre-Civil War era were Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster. These men all died nearly a decade before the civil war began, but they didn’t know how much they would effect it. States’ rights was a very controversial issue, and one which had strong opposition and radical proposals coming from both sides. John C. Calhoun was in favor of giving states the power to nullify laws that they saw unconstitutional, and he presented this theory in his “Doctrine of Nullification”. Daniel Webster strongly disagreed with this proposal and showed this by giving powerful support to President Jackson in resisting the attempt by South Carolina to nullify the ‘tariff of abominations’, as they called it; a shipping tax passed in 1828 that they saw as unfairly favoring the industrial North.
Gary Gerstle argues America followed a path both civic and racial nationalism throughout the 20th century in his book American Crucible: Race and Nation in the Twentieth Century, and that America is a melting pot of different cultures due to the accumulation of immigrants in the twentieth century. He uses Theodore Roosevelt as a support base for his arguments. Civic nationalism is the idealized understanding of America as an ethnic and cultural melting pot based on civil rights, and on the values of equality and liberty no matter the race and ethnicity of one another. Civic nationalism claims a nation can still grow stronger and better based solely on civil rights and citizenship.
Today the American nation is made up of people that identify as coming from many different races and cultures. Bourne would have seen this as a success of his views during the Progressive Era. “Bourne envisions a tapestry with ethnic threads interwoven but still distinct. However, these threads are not tied off at geographical boundary lines. Bourne’s image is an international tapestry, in which the threads of America’s fabric extend to its inhabitants’ many cultures and places of origin” (Fischer, 155). This vision has very much came true in current American society due to our internationality. People today are more accepting of different cultures that appear in the United States, but the...
The term melting-pot has been used since the 1700s. It has always been a metaphor to describe immigrants coming to America. The melting pot is a fusion of cultures and ethnicities into one larger culture. Americans did not like the idea of immigration to their country, viewing their country as beautiful the way it was. Many thought America would be ruined if too many people immigrated and left their cultural mark on the country. The melting-pot concept on immigration seems to highlight historically how America came to be, but for more current immigration, Americans views are more negative. American attitude towards immigrants in the 1900s was not very favorable. Since they feared them, immigrants were often treated horribly by Americans. Robert H. Clancy says, “Vigorous complaint and more or less bitter persecution have been aimed at newcomers to our shores. Also the congressional reports of about 1840 are full of abuse of English, Scotch, Welsh immigrants as paupers, criminals, and so forth.” (Clancy,
Throughout the speech, the Former President George W Bush strives to empower Americans by instructing them to remain resolute, but to “go back to [their] lives and routines”. He uses the personal pronoun we and the common pronoun us repeatedly to indicate that the people of the United States, who either saw the event on television or experienced this event firsthand, were and still are involved in this national tragedy. He implements this emotional appeal into his speech to involve all Americans--people living in the United States of America, regardless of their ethnicity, race, or culture, and to acknowledge that the American people have endured this together, and that they will continue to advance after this event with stronger resolve, stronger than ever. In addition, he implements personification to motivate and empower the American people. “Our nation, this generation, will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future” (Bush, 2001). “This generation”, again a synonym for the American people, with its unwavering resolve, will fight for its freedom persistently. He intimates that the future of America and of democratic freedom is in the hands of the American people: that the American people have the power to control their fate. The next sentence leads into America’s “philanthropically” democratic nature: “We will rally the world to this cause, by our efforts and by our courage” (Bush, 2001). This statement has been followed up by action only a few years later, when the United States intervened in the Iraqi War, Libyan Revolution, and even more civil wars to ensure the freedom of citizens from dictatorships, which in Islāmic nations, were militant groups, like the Hamas and Taliban. Lastly, the president utilized anaphora, specifically a tripartite structure, by affirming that the American people “will not tire”, “will not falter”, and “will not fail”. He implies that the American people will relentlessly fight for the worldwide establishment of peace and democratic institutions, a promise which America has kept even in the face of its own national crisis.
Perhaps, the “Melting Pot” myth gained strength during the Industrial Revolution. With millions of immigrants entering the United States, culture was changing within the United States. Americans set a high standard for there society and everyone wanted to be accepted. There was a social requirement to live in a civil society creating together the “American Dream,” which leads to prosperity. Many immigrants moving to the United States brought with them various traditions of their culture and after moving, they repressed such beliefs and forged ahead with a new way of “American Thinking.” The rituals and traditions of such societies should have brought diversity to this nation’s culture however, these ways would soon become a part of the past. The “Melting Pot” myth heavily influences American society and people believe that everyone no matter what skin color or religious belief is created equal. This belief of the American Way of life is idyllic to say the least. Unfortunately, this myth has been thwarted due to a high level of racial supremacy within the nations past and even present. There are two particular events in national history, which will forever hinder equality: slavery of African Americans and Japanese internment camps during World War II in America. These substantial events shape our society and are only the tip of the iceberg when it
...ld not protect the interest of the Southern states. Coupled with the hostilities, lack of votes for Lincoln from the South and disregard for the constitutional protection of slavery is a justifiable reason from the Southern leaders to secede from the Union.
Takaki highlights these ideas in his book A Different Mirror. Takaki recounts U.S history in the voices of Native Americans, Irish Americans, African Americans, Asian American, Latinos and others. Takaki challenges the idea of what it really means to be an American. Throughout the first chapter, Takaki talks about the idea of being an American, and how we have been taught in a way where we see our national identity as being “white” and anything other then that would be considered different. If you were not a white American back in the day, you were considered less of a person in the eyes of many people. This is what white American people considered a “national community” back in the day. Because of this, the minority groups were forced to work the same jobs and almost become apart of their own community themselves. Takaki states in the first chapter that “Despite antagonisms, minorities also had much in common: labor experiences, hopeful dreams, and, above all, values.”(Takaki, 11) Takaki is stating here that although they were of different heritages, they were apart of a community of minorities. African Americans were cultivating cotton, which was then sent to New England where Irish factory workers were operating the machines, and then Jewish women would sew the clothes. There were connected in their own separate community apart from the “national community”. Another example of this comes when “In 1903, Mexican and Japanese farm laborers went on strike together in California.”(Takaki, 13) This is another example where these minorities came together and formed a common interest and created their own labor community. These examples go to show how even in our history, the idea of a national community has only been an idea and that our nation consists of many different. Individual
As the country began to grow and expand we continued to see disagreements between the North and South; the Missouri Territory applied for statehood the South wanted them admitted as a slave state and the North as a free state. Henry Clay eventually came up with the Missouri Compromise, making Missouri a slave state and making Maine it’s own state entering the union as a free state. After this compromise any state admitted to the union south of the 36° 30’ latitude would be a slave state and a state north of it would be free. The country was very much sectionalized during this time. Thomas Jefferson felt this was a threat to the Union. In 1821, he wrote, ”All, I fear, do not see the speck on our horizon which is to burst on us as a tornado, sooner or later. The line of division lately marked out between the different portions of our confederacy is such...
America was founded on change. Past revolutions were fought to make new ways in which to live life in this country. Our families all came to America, at one point, to feed into this definition of being an American. The term melting pot in my mind means structure, meaning what we, as Americans, are made of. It was many ethnic backgrounds that came to make up our country. So as more and more people migrate to America, stand up for the changes they believe in, this country will only continue to get stronger.
Millions of immigrants over the previous centuries have shaped the United States of America into what it is today. America is known as a “melting pot”, a multicultural country that welcomes and is home to an array of every ethnic and cultural background imaginable. We are a place of opportunity, offering homes and jobs and new economic gains to anyone who should want it. However, America was not always such a “come one, come all” kind of country. The large numbers of immigrants that came during the nineteenth century angered many of the American natives and lead to them to blame the lack of jobs and low wages on the immigrants, especially the Asian communities. This resentment lead to the discrimination and legal exclusion of immigrants, with the first and most important law passed being the Chinese Exclusion Act. However, the discrimination the Chinese immigrants so harshly received was not rightly justified or deserved. With all of their contributions and accomplishments in opening up the West, they were not so much harming our country but rather helping it.
The United States of America was built on a foundation of immigration. Our country started from people seeking religious refuge from tyrannical England. From that point on America was seen as a place for people who wanted a better life. Throughout the years, more immigrants came and they weren’t just from England. People who felt prosecuted, unwanted, or were just sick of how their life was in their country came to America. For a while, we welcomed them with open arms. There was such an influx of people from all different cultures and backgrounds that America became known as the melting pot. Then slowly, as people forgot their heritage, America started refusing these immigrants. So what happened to America’s melting pot?
The age old question that many ask today is “what is an American?” America is continued to be called the “melting pot” of the world. This statement refers to the combination of different cultures and ethnicities throughout the United States. The diversity of America should not take away from the history and foundation it was found upon. ...