Main Difference Between Media, Communication And Philosophy Of Media And Communication

4579 Words10 Pages

Question
What are the main differences between a theory of media and communication and the philosophy of media and communication? Explore this question as fully as possible within the set page limits, while paying close attention to the following details:
a) There should be an introductory focus on the very possibility of a philosophy of media and communication.
b) The role of philosophy of science and especially social science can or should play in this discourse.
c) Illustrate your answer with the close but brief examination of two media theories or two theories of communication; and two philosophies of media and communication.
Whenever philosophy is mentioned in itself or in a connector with any matter or study in any academic endeavour, it becomes a quagmire of limitless intellectual, argumentative, psychological landline of abstraction. However, it can be reasoned that the contentions have directions and precepts that are easily made and …show more content…

This pattern of diffusion can be a philosophy of communication because it aims to understand the systemic pattern of speech and the abstract understanding of communicability through the application of inference and defensible laws of justification, frugality, ingenuousness, imperfection and argumentation. These rules are not connected with any arbitrariness or environment, but from the logic of communication like the universal language, clearness, consistency and mode of communication each of these can fabricate the philosophy of

Open Document