Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Machiavelli's political theory
Machiavelli's political theory
Pros and cons of the roman republic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Machiavelli's political theory
Machiavelli's philosophy described in his writings The Prince had a pragmatic approach to politics. Machiavelli, born in 1469 during the Italian Renaissance, was a political philosopher, along with military experience as a defense secretary of the Florentine republic. He believed that a strong leader would provide security. In medieval times kings were appointed by God ruled men. The provided law and were scared individuals. Machiavelli, during the Renaissance period had an idealized view of leadership.
Machiavelli believed that the rulers should be those willing to defy, betray, deceive and kill in order to maintain their power. This was a radical approach to politics than ever before. Catholics had no interest in his radical ideas; however he did give them a dose of realpolitik into their political beliefs. As he states in The Prince, the way a prince should keep their word "in actions of men, especially princes, where there is no recourse to justice, the end is all that counts. A prince should only be concerned with conquering or maintaining a state, for the means will always be judged to be honorable and brave worthy by each and every person, because the masses always follow appearances and the outcomes of affairs, and the world is nothing than the masses."
…show more content…
He believed that "it is necessary for a ruler, if he wants to hold on to power, to lean how not to be good, and to know when it is and when it is not necessary to use his knowledge". Which brings up a good point about politics at the time? Machiavelli delivered idea of a monarchy, where leaders hold all the power verses a mix of constitutions; monarch, aristocracy and democracy. Democracy was what Machiavelli leaves out in his writings of The Prince that was the major force for the establishment of monarchy during the renaissance
All about a prince is the danger of death. This danger may come from treason within his government, war with foreign enemies, or a rebellion of his people. The situation is always kill-or-be-killed, and the Fifth Commandment - "Thou shalt not kill." - is discarded before it is ...
The subject of human nature has great emphasis in “The Prince”. Human beings are viewed as rational decision makers who try to maximize their self-interest. They are inclined to help whoever will give them the most benefits and by definition, may easily betray someone to whom they were previously loyal seeing a better opportunity. A large part of being a prince or a politician is being able to lead people, and therefore it is of utter importance in how to deal with their behavior. “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will fin...
Machiavelli's realization of the penultimate import of the people is probably most significant reason his book holds so much influence on realpolitik. He writes, "it is essential for a prince to possess the good will and affections his people, otherwise he will be utterly without support in time of adversity." (Chapter 9). Clearly, Machiavelli understands the source of power within a princely republic lay with the people, whom the prince must constantly court. No other political philosopher before him had ever given much significance to those being governed. The reason that Machiavelli felt that the subjects were vital to the prince maintaining his rule was because the implications of earning the hatred and ill will of the people are dire for the political future of both the state and the prince. Of the two sources of attack the prince must fear, one is a conspiracy from within inspired by the hatred of the people (Chapter 19). Additionally, the prince must be aware that actions of his intermediaries can reflect upon himself. That is, if his army is cruel and brutish towards the people, the people will turn their hatred upon the prince, who is seen to tacitly condone the actions of the army. ...
(Deveaux 38). Machiavelli, The Prince demonstrates how to become better rulers and how to maintain their power over his men. He underlines that princes ought to know about the art of ruling and to sustain his position regardless of what it takes. For an example, violence would be the answer if men were to disobey any obligations upon him. The Prince was believed to be the start of the new modern way of political thought.
Another topic he covers is cruelty, if cruelty is used in the right way the prince will gain much respect and it will preserve a prince’s safety or will help secure the state; it is safer for a prince to be feared than it is for him to be loved because no one will listen or respect a leader who they take to be a joke. Men fear punishment, and this can be used to a prince’s advantage. Men will not disobey if there is a chance of them being killed or thrown in
These are just some of the virtues of a prince. Some are good, some are evil and there are many in between but to be worthy of praise the prince would be required to have all of the above qualities. To have all of qualities would be almost impossible because human nature would not allow it to happen. To strive to be perfect is a good goal as prince but the stress and difficulty for that to happen would ultimately ruin that prince and his
1. In The Prince, by Machiavelli, he describes how it is expected that a prince with integrity is the best kind, however, his experience has taught him that this is not necessarily the case. A prince is usually expected to be an honorable, honest and a man who sticks to his word. However, it is not always good for a prince to do so and there are many reasons to proves this point. Honesty and righteousness are not the only two important aspects, a prince should not be too innocent or gullible so people are not able to take advantage of him.
Machiavelli’s views are realistic but pessimistic on what makes the ideal leader. He states that the ruler must appear to have strong virtues, but cannot rely on them. The Prince must always do what is best for the state, even if it is unethical. In Plato’s The Republic, his ideal state includes a class system. Working class people are on the bottom, the military is in the middle, and the top class is reserved for the leaders.
Machiavelli?s model for his ideal prince was Cesare Borgia, also known as Duke Valentino and son of Pope Alexander VI. He believed Cesare Borgia possessed all the qualities of a prince destined to rule and maintain power in his state. He believed that politics has a morality of its own. There is no regard of justness or unjustness, of cruelty or mercy, of approval or humiliation, which should interfere with the decision of defending the state and preserving its freedom. Therefore, the ruler/prince's single responsibilit...
The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli isn't about one man's ways to feed his power hungry mindset through gluttony, nor is it just explaining altercations between a nation's states. This writing is regarding to how one's self-confidence can make them become powerful in a society and also, the way morals and politics differ and can be separate in a government. Originally, Machiavelli wrote The Prince to gain support from Lorenzo de' Medici, who during the era, was governor of Florence. As meant as writing for how a society should be run, this book has been read by many peoples around the world who want to have better knowledge of the perfect stability of beliefs and politics required to run a good civilization.
Niccolò Machiavelli was born into a world of drastic change, Renaissance Italy, that would cause his mind to conjure ideas about many political issues transferred into books that the entire world has profited from since. His ideas were incredibly relevant to his time, because they suggested harsh governments, the only kind of governments that seemed to be working. He proposed creating these harsh governments through a separation of personal morality and political behavior. His ideas were so relevant and so universal, that they still influence politics today. Niccolò Machiavelli proposed the creating of strong central government more powerful than anything else, including religion and morality.
Niccolo Machiavelli was a political philosopher from Florence, Italy. The period that Machiavelli lived in was the "rebirth" of art in Italy and rediscovery of ancient philosophy, literature and science. He wrote The Prince, in which he discusses the proper way of living as a prince. His ideas, which were not viewed as beneficial at the time, were incredibly cynical and took time for the rest of the population to really catch onto the ideas. Machiavelli’s view of human nature was that humans are born evil, and while they can show good traits, and the common man is not to be trusted. Unlike Confucius, Machiavelli believes that human nature cannot be changed, and unlike Plato, where Plato believes in humans as social beings. Each respected view
feel that a Prince should mistreat the citizens. This suggestion is only to serve the Prince's best interests.
When Machiavelli generalizes humanity qualities we consider to be human, such as empathy, compassion, and even free-will aren't even mentioned by him. Machiavelli strongly promoted a secular society and felt morality was not necessary. But he stood in fact, in the way of an effectively governed principality. Machiavelli believes the ruling Prince is an individual authority who can control every aspect of the state and can effect a policy according to his best interests. These interests were gaining, maintaining, and expanding his political power.
Machiavelli’s, “The Prince” is the ideal book for individuals intending to both govern and maintain a strong nation. Filled with practical advice, he includes numerous religious references to support his claims. He devotes a chapter within the book to speak about the ancient founders of states. In the chapter called, “On new principalities that are acquired by one’s own arms and by virtue”, Machiavelli discussed the importance of a prince to have their own talent in governing a nation, rather than having relied on fortune to rule. The latter is a risk no leader should take and he cited past leaders as a guide for both the current and future princes.