Lulu lemon prides itself on being innovative. One of the areas in which they are known for is their promotion programs. In the past Lulu lemon got its start from offering buy one get one free deals, free trial promotions, and discounted prices. Traditionally, Lulu utilized the buy one get one free deals the most because the consumer base reacted better to this offer because of the high price for the product. Another reason in which Lulu found effectiveness in using these promotions because they believed their cliental would either buy for a friend or in general bring new possible clients into the business. However, as the years changed and technology revolutionized, Lululemon has kept up with the changes. They have renovated their marketing …show more content…
Since the market atmosphere is so saturated with competitors, it is virtually impossible to focus on all the competitors in the industry, Thus, company’s like Lulu need to prioritize their competition through identifying if they are either indirect or direct competitors. Looking at the direct competitors we are left to believe the greatest risk lies with companies such as Under Armor, Nike, Adidas. These companies are popular with men and (women), and most importantly they have products that are comparable in substance and price to Lululemon’s main production. These companies also have an asset of name recognition that can serve them well when new consumers enter the market, because chances are these names will be some of the first names they hear. These competitors have a substantial market share in the industry, which comes to a total of more than two thirds of the movement in the market place. In specifics Nike’s total revenue for 2016 was $32,376,000 compared to Lululemon’s $2,344,392 in 2016. Therefore, it is clear the company has some catching up to do in sales and market share. Nike has positioned itself to be an elite athletic specialization company that is affordable enough that most men and women can purchase the product. Also, Nike has done enough to position its company as both a man and a women company compared to Lululemon’s positioning in women’s fitness wear. Finally, with revenue larger than Lululemon it is difficult to compete with their promotional budget. Thus, it is imperative to find new and innovative ways to breach this highly divisive market. In contrast Lululemons strengths are that they are using social media in ways their competitors are not utilizing (ex: corresponding with them), this creates a connection with the cliental that is hard to beat. They
While looking at many different reviews people posted online, customers of lululemon athletica seem to be very pleased with the wear and tear of their products. Many different sources say that lululemon athletica’s clothing lasts for an extremely long time therefore people feel that their getting their money’s worth. lululemon athletica is a trend in itself because many consumers want to show off that they work out and wear an expensive clothing line while doing so and love flaunt
The most recognized brands amongst US males in the sports and fitness clothing market are Nike, Adidas, Reebok, and Puma (Statista, 2014). However, there is a large amount of opportunity to gain market share as only Nike hold a high percentage favoritism from male shoppers (Statista, 2012). Multiple brands have a stronger focus on women’s clothing such as: Fabletics, Athleta, and Lululemon. Lululemon has a similar business model however the brand has a stronger connection with women and yoga.
For example, lifestyle is one the major psychological factors that pushes the organization’s strategy. Lululemon wanted to create a “community hub where people could learn and discuss the physical aspects of healthy living, mindfulness and living a life of possibility”. Customers buy high end ‘lulu’ leggings to be part of the self-transformation movement lifestyle. The clienteles who purchase Lululemon’s leggings also perceive them to be of higher quality, thus don’t mind spending more if they receive better quality in return. Overall these psychological factors make Lululemon a popular exclusive brand that promotes the idea of a better lifestyle, this consumer behavior has helped Lululemon become more known with many sociocultural influences. With the increase of yoga and social media throughout the years, Lululemon is presented as a staple for yogi’s and athletes online and in person. Yoga instructors teach classes, pose in Instagram photos, and participate in self-exploration experiences all while wearing Lululemon leggings. This sparks the interest of consumers new to the lifestyle who view this as an influence to buy a pair. Lululemon also have a loyal clientele base that rave about the quality and comfort that come with buying a pair of Lululemon leggings. With the popularity, and the higher cost, many see buying a pair of leggings as
Kilpatrick, Marcus, Edward Hebert, and John Bartholomew. "College Students' Motivation for Physical Activity: Differentiating Men's and Women's Motives for Sport Participation and Exercise ." Journal of American College Health 54 (2005): 92. Mintel . Web. 4 Dec. 2013.
Problem: Lululemon Athletica wants to convert consumers of rival workout clothing companies to become loyal customers of Lululemon.
Rivalry is especially strong in the outdoor apparel industry. Patagonia competes with many comparable outdoor clothing brands who feature cheaper, more affordable alternatives of high quality. With innovation and sustainability being a core value of their target market, Patagonia must consistently introduce new technology, increased durability, and added comfort in order to remain relevant and competitive. The threats that Patagonia faces has to do with the bargaining power of buyers and the threat of industry competition. As a company focused on quality, Patagonia faces the threat of buyers forcing down their prices by not purchasing their goods. Buyers might feel that their products, although high-quality, are too pricy to purchase. There is also the threat of
Conclusion Since Lululemon started in 1998 they have expanded the company into North America and Australia and offered high end yoga products. Lululemon was able to corner the market in a market driven business, which has strengths and weaknesses to consider. This company could benefit from more aggressive advertising because they have such great brand recognition and consumer loyalty. With the retail market changing and more competitors entering the market, Lululemon needs to stay competitive and offer a broader spectrum of products and expand their markets into areas they already have great brand recognition. Lululemon takes pride in offering a high quality product and this company has changed the way the world sees yoga appeal today.
Lululemon, a premium yoga-focused retail chain, serves two market segments. One segment consists of consumers who are characterized as “trendy urban” and the other segment consists of “wealthy” consumers. The “trendy urban” segment, in summary, is fashion oriented or active women who live in metropolitan areas. The “wealthy” market segment is affluent women who live in either urban or suburban areas. As discussed below, these two market segments are defined by differences in demographics, geography as well as behavioral and psychographic characteristics.
Since 1998, Lululemon has transformed the way people dress to workout. Through innovative products and technical athletic fabrics, a brand was created to provide clothing for workouts such as yoga, running and cycling. Lululemon opened its first store in Vancouver in 2000 with the plan to have the store be a community hub for people to learn and discuss their physical fitness and overall health goals. As Lululemon was more than a store to provide products for consumers, their goal was to influence every person who walked into the store. A basic criterion for investment is Lululemon’s mission to create components for people to live longer, healthier, fun lives. All Lululemon locations maintain strong relationships with local communities and host in-store events such as complimentary yoga classes and goal-setting workshops.
The retail industry is continuously growing. There are many successful companies and entrepreneurs in this industry. One successful entrepreneur is Dennis Wilson, also known as Chip Wilson.
Under Amour Company ventured into a market segment that was overcrowded, it had thousands of companies that competed against each other. Out of the many companies involved in the trade, the two most formidable threats seemed to be orchestrated by Nike and Adidas. These are two giant sports apparel and footwear, which pride themselves as having been long term veterans in the industry. Nike in particular was christened as the ultimate shoe and athletic apparel company with revenues of $18.6 billion, net income of $1.9 billion and more than thirty two thousand employees globally in the year 2008. This makes it the largest athletic shoe and apparel seller in the world. This company has seen major expansions in outlets throughout the world over the years. Adidas on its part has managed to build a powerful brand through its technological innovations and aggressive marketing where they spend up to thirteen per cent of their revenue besides offering high quality services. These scenarios seem to present Under Armour with a massive competitive disadvantage.
Nike’s goal is to remain unique and different from others in terms of the items offered on the market. Arguably, Nike belongs to a monopolistically competitive market as there only a few organizations with the ability to regulate the amount charged for their product which means they cannot make their prices high as this is likely to make customers move on to other available choices (Nike, Inc., 2012). However, Nike can find a balance between the prices to charge for their products and remaining competitive with other companies in the industry. Nike has formed a distinction between the appearance and performance of their footwear and that of their competitors. Although products are differentiated from other companies, they still influence each other because they are items of the same
C-79). The company is also offering products and apparel intended for other healthy and athletic lifestyle pastimes rather than solely for yoga. These include swimwear, which were introduce for women in fiscal 2013 and men in the spring of 2014, dance apparel through its ivivva brand, as well as expected golf and tennis products (Thompson, 2014, p. C-80). Additionally, Lululemon offers such products as gear bags, water bottles, caps, gloves, headbands, and socks. This supports the company’s core component to “broaden the lululemon product line beyond yoga, running, and general fitness (specifically swimming, golf, and tennis) and include offerings for both males and females of many ages” (Thompson, 2014, p. C-79) for its fiscal 2014 business strategy. This indicates that the senior administrators of Lululemon have been transitioning the company’s competitive strategy from having a narrow market focus just on yoga
Nike American Sportswear generated revenue of 7495 million US dollars in 2014, which was almost double of 2009 revenue of Nike Sportswear (Statista, 2015).The sales of (Athletic) Sportswear of Nike 90 million US dollars, however, the sale of Adidas Sportswear (Competitor of Nike) was 25 million US dollars, which was not even one third of Nike Sportswear sales (Statista, 2015).Nonetheless, the return on assets and equity are 13.41% and 26.43% respectively (Yahoo Finanace, 2015).
Nike’s positioning in the market has more of a mass appeal compared to their main competitor Adidas who strive to make products for elite athletes. The positioning strategy for Nike is currently working at a satisfactory level as Nikes global annual sales between 2013-2014 was reported as 27.8 billion (Statista, 2014) compared to Adidas’ 19.95 billion (Statista, 2014). The global market for sports apparel is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 4% between 2012-2019, Nikes compound annual growth rate during 2010-2012 was 12.3% which is an excellent result as the brand’s growth was larger than the market as well as outgrowing Nike’s closest competitors Adidas, Puma and Asics (Forbes,