Luke 11: 1-13

2291 Words5 Pages

Luke 11:1-13 demonstrates the disciple’s desire to become more like the one they are following, Jesus, through their prayer life. They have the ability and insight to understand that prayer is the most crucial aspect of Jesus’ rule and reign here on earth, rather than his ability to perform miracles or speak eloquently. The disciples ask for guidance in what they deem the most important feature of Jesus’, and therefore, their, life. As Jesus provides them with the guidance they request, he gives them an outline to follow—he’s not saying that they must pray for the exact things that he does, but rather, that there is a proper way to address God and a way of humbly beseeching God for what they need while still glorifying Him in his goodness and …show more content…

This passage opens with the Lord’s prayer, of which there are two versions, Matthew’s and Luke’s. Matthew’s rendering of this prayer expands on the words and ideas that Luke obtains; however, it is thought that the Matthean wording is probably closer to the original, while the Lukan version probably demonstrates a condensed form of the prayer (Nolland 612-613). Regardless of which gospel preserves the original prayer, the archetypal Jewish prayer that is recorded in Luke indicates that when one is praying, their “concern should be with the present honoring of God’s name in the world and with the coming of his kingdom; they are to pray each day for the needs of the present day (the future they should leave to God) but also for God’s forgiveness of their failings...; in recognition of their own frailty they should pray to be spared from such trials as might crush them” (Nolland 612). In addition, with the way that Luke presents this prayer, the focus shifts from “the future to the present manifestation of the kingdom”, which is not displayed to the same degree in Matthew’s rendering of the prayer (Ellis …show more content…

A friend of this family approaches their door and shamelessly knocks and asks for three loaves of bread. Nolland asserts that, based on Eastern hospitality patterns, “we should think in terms of a very generous, even excessively generous provision for the guest’s needs” (624). Fitzmyer draws a differing conclusion, that the three loaves are “maybe something like three rolls…it is the equivalent of meal for one person” (911). However, regardless the exact amount asked for and given, it is important to note that the friend asks for a specific amount. He is aware of what he needs, and makes sure that he asks for no more and no less. By approaching his friend’s door with such a specific request and not growing tired in his beseeching, we are to draw the conclusion that we are also to approach God with specific requests, never lacking in ardor as we ask. This also demonstrates the type of asking that God is likely to answer: asking that is persistent, specific, and based on a friendship with the person one is asking for things from. The man inside first refuses his friends, and then as it is realized that the knocking man will not leave until his bread has been received, he rises and hands the bread to his friend. Ellis acknowledges that this “request is outrageous”, and yet it is given because “persistence is rewarded” (165). On the same note, Fitzmyer acknowledges that

Open Document