Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Love vs. friendship essay
Define love from a sociological perspective
Define love from a sociological perspective
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Love vs. friendship essay
When I traditionally think of love, the dictionary definition often comes to mind. A natural feeling that happens often without control or forewarning; a feeling that overwhelms you completely. There could either be love at first sight or the feeling could be formed over a long period of time consisting of small moments that build up into this passionate feeling. “What is love? Baby don’t hurt me- don’t hurt me, no more”. The 1993 classic’s catchy hook may sound nice but has layers of sophisticated meaning. Like this hip single, much of mainstream music depicts love as a romantic, usually lustful, relationship between two individuals. Barbara Fredrickson brings to the forefront the idea that love may actually be much more.
The notion of love
…show more content…
One that possibly contributes to what makes us human(survival of the fittest). She juxtaposes love to a to a screenplay where “ main characters deliver their lines quietly, most often fully outside of your conscious awareness. As you move through your day, these biological characters- your brain, your oxytocin, and your vagus nerve- are ever responsive to set changes ( Frederickson 109-110).” We are introduced to the characters that make “love” happen in our bodies. The Princeton University study (211) provides an actual metric for Fredrickson's positivity resonance. “...the degree to which your brains lit up in synchrony…”. Scientists have found a way to quantify love. I find that …show more content…
Understanding the science behind love certainly will help one towards self-improvement as society will more actively try to pursue meaningful connections and try more to empathize with others. Simply sharing a laugh, understanding each other's problems, eating together, and even crying together builds the foundation that love grows on These micro moments are what makes the concept of love so much more complicated and beautiful than what people originally think. Personally, I now know how helpful understanding love and its benefits. Becoming more positive as a person is surely beneficial and healthy as Barbara Fredrickson states that “evidence suggests that positivity resonance raises your oxytocin levels. And under the influence of oxytocin, you grow calmer, more attuned to others, friendlier, and more open. Here, too, your skills for forging connections sharpen (Frederickson 120).” Evidently the mental and physical benefits of simply being more positive about love are endless. Understanding the deeper aspects of love scientifically can make anymore more positive, interactive, and most importantly, they can achieve the happiness everyone longs for.
This article has good intentions but in my personal opinion I feel is walking into unknown territory. The support given by Barbara Fredrickson are like Jango pieces upon the assumption that love
"Love can affect you so deeply that it reshapes you from the inside out and by doing so alters you destiny for future loving moments" says Fredrickson but she seems to have forgotten that there always two perspectives to any ideology. It is indubitable that the experiences of love play a crucial role in molding an individual, but it is ignorant to say that only love will cause such change. The reality is that not all relationships and encounters are true "micro-moment of love" and those negative experiences also partake in what creates the identity and thought process of an individual. With the knowledge that an individual 's cell play a crucial role in deciding who to have "micro-moments of love"; such negative experience will be associated with the factual, biological notion of love. Thus causing individuals to feel that the negative experience they had to face and deal with were a result of their body and its biology. The idea that their body and brain, essentially unalterable, were capable of causing them pain and heartache, will hinder them from achieving the love and longing for others that Fredrickson describes. The idea that love is functioning by the orders registered by the individual 's body, makes love uncontrollable. Humans in nature are predisposed
Mature Love In Laura Kipnis Against Love, what I believe love to be is uniquely questioned and probed in every manner. Kipnis yanks at every part of a relationship that is, according to her, inevitably bound to fail. Unfortunately I believe she mostly writes about the negatives of marriage and infidelity rather than love. It is troubling to agree with her uncomfortable views on marriage and coupledom becoming a sort of renunciation of personal desires, but I think Kipnis is brave in creating this polemic suggesting the way love has been programmed into us by modern society, as an all encompassing, fantasy type of love, all about one person forever.
Love is said to be one of the most desired things in life. People long for it, search for it, and crave it. It can come in the form of partners, friends, or just simply family. To some, love is something of a necessity in life, where some would rather turn a cold shoulder to it. Love can be the mixture of passion, need, lust, loyalty, and blood. Love can be extraordinary and breathtaking. Love being held so high can also be dangerous. Love can drive people to numerous mad things with it dangerously so full of craze and passion.
The article '' love: the right chemistry'' by Anastasia Toufexis efforts to explain the concept of love from a scientific aspect in which an amateur will understand. Briefly this essay explains and describe in a scientific way how people's stimulation of the body works when you're falling in love. The new scientific researches have given the answer through human physiology how genes behave when your feelings for example get swept away. The justification for this is explained by how the brain gets flooded by chemicals. The author expresses in one point that love isn't just a nonsense behavior nor a feeling that exhibits similar properties as of a narcotic drug. This is brought about by an organized chemical chain who controls different depending on the individual. A simple action such as a deep look into someone's eyes can start the simulation in the body that an increased production of hand sweat will start. The tingly feeling inside your body is a result of a scientific delineation which makes the concept of love more concretely and more factually mainly for researchers and the wide...
Nozick says that it is incoherent to ask how love benefits an individual person because it is through love that the individual identity is able to morph and create the we identity. He states that the jointed identity of the we relationship “enlarges and enhances your individual one.” (pg 233) Other benefits he lists in Love's Bond include how there is a form of unconditional love or total acceptance expressed by the lovers, such as disregarding or forgiving the fact that certain foibles exist. Therefore it is incoherent to ask how an individual who has not experienced love to explain or understand love's properties or receive the benefits of being in the we relationship.
In the book Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Feel, Think, Do, and Become, Barbara Fredrickson discusses the biological aspects of love and the connections that people can have through interactions with each other. Fredrickson aims to increase the reader’s knowledge of how love works and she even tries to change the way people view love. She wants people to take a more static and scientific approach to connections between people rather than the emotional mystery that people view it as now. Sherry Turkle on the other hand wrote the book titled Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other where she tries to uncover how human interactions and connections work by observing human responses
Love, an intense, deep feeling of connection, romantic, or sexual attachment showing affection for someone or something. As for all pleasant emotions, the feeling that comes with love is exquisitely satisfying. It feels like a cool, , long drink of water when you are parched on a hot day, it it refreshing. Scientists have a pretty good idea of what love does to the brain. Being in love floods the brain with chemicals and hormones that produce feelings of pleasure, obsession and attachment. Neuroscientists divide love into three phases: lust, attraction and attachment. During the lust phase, hormones flood the body with feelings of intense desire. Adrenaline and norepinephrine make the heart race and the palms sweat, while the brain chemical
...ices today. As long as I love with intensity and balance, I might make an alright triangle that could possibly match with someone else’s to give me my perfect happy ending. In that, I am not taking sides with either psychologist. Both claims have substantial validity and seem believable enough but my experiences with love, parental or intimate, have been too fleeting and insubstantial to make a claim about it. I do not doubt its power, but I do doubt that its meaning will ever truly be discovered.
Science disregards emotions and does not relate to people who are in anguish. In a conversation with Miss Faust, Dr. Hoenikker asks, “What is love” (55). Love is the most basic of human emotions. Science as a whole cannot understand or relate to human relationships. They are isolated from others, making it hard for others to understand science.
As any romantic will assert, love is by far the most powerful force known to human hearts and minds. This sentiment is espoused throughout history, almost to the point of cliché. Everyone has heard the optimistic statement, “love conquers all,” and The Beatles are certain, however idyllic it may be, that “all you need is love.” Humanity is convinced that love is unique within human emotion, unequalled in its power to both lift the spirit up in throws of ecstasy, and cast it down in utter despair.
In The New Humanities Reader edited by Richard E. Miller and Kurt Spellmeyer. We read about Barbara Fredrickson the author of the book “Love 2.0” copy right (2013). Barbara Fredrickson is a psychologist who show in her research how our supreme emotion affects everything we Feel, Think, Do and become. Barbara also uses her research from her lab to describe her ideas about love. She defines love not as a romance or stable emotion between friends, partners and families, but as a micro-moment between all people even stranger (108). She went farther in her interpretation of love and how the existence of love can improve a person’s mental and physical health (107). Through reading
As your respective brain waves mirrors one another, each of you, moment by moment, changes the other’s mind” (Fredrickson 110). The notion of love is defined as some type of feeling when two individuals truly connect, for this example exemplifies that it is present when sharing one common emotion. As for this example, the two are sharing love, when they are connecting and experiencing a common emotion, which then results in the notion of understanding of a connection. Even though this example displays that sharing one emotion with another person may lead to a happier life, it also shows a change in action. Sharing one emotion, for this case, shows that it also causes two individuals to change each other’s minds.
This theory involves three different dimensions which include passion, intimacy, and commitment. When combined in different ways, these dimensions show different kinds of love. The different forms of love discussed in our text are infatuation, affectionate love, fatuous love, and consummate love. In my own life I have only experienced a couple different forms of the love that Sternberg describes. The two forms that I know I have experienced are affectionate love and infatuation. Consummate love is a type of love that I have never experienced. I hope to one day reach consummate love with someone and spend the rest of my life with him. I realize that not everyone gets to experience that kind of love, but I’m hopeful
Love is many things; it has not one description that can be pin pointed. Love can be described as the openness of a relationship, the sexual attraction between partners, or can be seen as pure attraction to each other’s personalities. In Jonathon Haidt’s book, The Happiness Hypothesis, he writes about the types of love there are and which he believes is the most important. There are two main types of love, companionate and passionate love. Haidt defines true love as companionate love, having more importance in a relationship than that of passionate love. Companionate love is perceived as a stronger love than Passionate love, because of a better understanding in companionship and passionate love will not be everlasting. The idea of companionate over passionate makes sense, but media has formed a different outlook on love that has warped the genuine imagery of love.
Poets and philosophers for centuries have been trying to answer the question, what is love? Love has an infinite number of definitions, which vary from one person to another. Love cannot be measured by any physical means. One may never know what true love is until love it- self has been experienced. What is love? A four letter word that causes a person to behave in a way that is out of character. What is love? A first kiss, childhood crushes on a teacher or friend’s mom. What is love? A choice that people make by putting their partner’s wishes, desires and needs above everything else. What is love? The act of forgiveness, the infatuation with someone, the communication between two people. What is love? A friendship that turned into a lifelong commitment, that special someone who has vowed to spend the rest of their lives to honor and protect, to love each other “till death do you part.” When in love nothing else in the world matters. According to the online Encarta Dictionary love is the passionate feeling of romantic and sexual desire and longing for somebody. Poets and philosophers may never know what love really is, and we may never truly understand the question what is love.