Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis lord of the flies
Literary analysis lord of the flies
Literary analysis lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The use of manipulation on others causes superiority and inferiority, which leads to a downfall in a society. William Golding wrote the novel, The Lord of the Flies (1954), in which he uses the protagonist, Jack Merridew, to demonstrate dictator-like characteristics. In comparison to today’s society, the leader of Ethiopia from 1995 to 2012, Meles Zenawi, has characteristics that mirror Jack’s leadership qualities. Both Jack Merridew and Meles Zenawi share characteristics that lean towards them both being dictators, which include: dominance, the torturing of others, and intimidation. A demonstration of strength shows one’s dominance when trying to be victorious. In the novel, The Lord of the Flies, the protagonist Jack shows his strength …show more content…
Golding shows the torturing of others by Jack through Piggy when it is Jack’s responsibility to keep the rescue fire going and he fails to do so. Just as a dictator would, Jack blames it on Piggy and resorts to violence, “...the bolting look came into his blue eyes. He took a step, and able at last to hit someone, stuck his fist into Piggy’s stomach… Jack stood over him. His voice was vicious with humiliation” (71). Jack tortures Piggy even though the fire burning out was his responsibility, but he feels superior to everyone; which causes him to blame others for his own actions. Just as Jack did in The Lord of the Flies, Meles resorted to torturing others in certain situations. Dictators such as Meles resort to violence of innocent people “because they can” and it will show their power of being a leader. One critic of Ethiopia referred to him as “a devil incarnate” (Khazan) and it was also said that “Human rights groups condemned him for sweeping crackdowns on dissent, including the deaths of 193 political protesters in street demonstrations during the 2005 election” (Khazan). Both Jack and Meles resorted to violence and torturing of others to assert their power as …show more content…
When Roger opened his eyes and saw him a darker shadow crept beneath the swarthiness of his skin; but Jack noticed nothing. He was eager, impatient, beckoning, so that Roger went to him” (62). Jack’s intimidation factor worked to cause Roger to stop throwing the stones at Henry. Roger had no remorse for throwing the stones until he saw Jack looking; Roger is scared of him. Such as Jack used intimidation to get others to do what he wanted, Zenawi did the exact same. He used intimidation to help win an election; “The shameless use of the security forces to retain power or intimidate the political opposition, and the culture of fear this engenders means that Premier Zenawi and his regime reinforced institutions the public fears” (Samatar). Zenawi used intimidation to put fear in the public and cause them to vote for his side. Intimidation is strong, especially when using it on weak minded people. Dictatorship is demonstrated when one feels the need to become superior to others. In today’s society, Meles Zenawi, and in the novel The Lord of the Flies, Jack Merridew, both share qualities that portray superiority. Through torture, dominance and intimidation they share a characteristic that is frowned upon; dictatorship. In today’s modern day society, dictatorship is not a worry because of things such as: elections, democracies and freedom. Although, there
In his novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding describes Jack as someone who promotes unity, someone who is skilled at manipulating people, and someone who idolizes violent actions. Jack has a lot in common with the World War II German dictator, Adolf Hitler, who had also demonstrated desires for unity, the manipulation of others and increased violence. All these similarities between them led to them destroying their society.
The Lord of the Flies is a gruesome story about young boys stranded on an island, who underwent a transformation from polite British choir boys to savage hooligans. One of the main difficulties the boys face during their adventures upon the island, is their method of government, they either follow the path of Ralph, the democratic leader whose main focus is to escape the despairing island; or Jack a power-hungry monarchical leader who won't ever take no for an answer. The two boys are constantly bickering and arguing over who deserves the leader-position. We all understand Ralph wants to be leader so that he can ensure that the boys will return back home, but in Jack's case, it is a constant mystery to us about why he wants power over the other children. But we do get much small hints from the author, William Golding, that Jack's biggest fear among the other children on the island is public humiliation. This becomes more and more evident the farther on into the book, and his fear seems to be what persuades him to reach for a powerful position.
Jack’s authoritative figure in the beginning of Lord of the Flies is one quality that shows how he is a dynamic character. To begin with, Jack shows he is authoritative by sabotaging Ralph’s integrity and rules. For instance, on pages one-hundred and one and one-hundred and two, Jack says, “We don’t need the conch anymore. We know who ought to say things. What good did Simon do speaking, or Bill, or Walter? It’s time some people knew they’ve got to keep quiet and leave deciding things to the rest of us.” Jack is trying to get rid of the idea that the conch, or freedom of speech, is needed. This is another step away from civilized behavior because a newly established order of power replaces the conch. Another way Jack shows he is authoritative is by wanting to be a leader. First, Jack forms his own group that he calls the hunters. Then, Jack intimidates the other boys to join his group by talking about the beast. Jack tells the little ‘uns that are scared that they will forget about the beast. ...
In the Lord of the Flies there are many themes that stand out. After reading Fredrick Douglass’ speech, “If I had a Country, I Should be a Patriot,” the theme that Goldings’ book that is most relatable to me is the lack of democracy and equal rights. Jack reminded me of a southern slave master and his primary focus that had no regard for others’ rights. In conclusion, in The Lord of the Flies, the rivalry between democracy and dictatorship is evident in Jack and Ralph’s relationship and relates back to the North versus the South rivalry for democracy for the
Jack, William Golding’s antagonist in Lord of the Flies, reveals through his experience on the island that it is an individual’s assertiveness, manipulative abilities, and charisma which dictate who commandeers power and privilege over others, and that possessing these traits often negatively impacts the lives of the people leaders seek to control.
William Golding’s timeless classic, Lord of the Flies, reflects Philip Zimbardo’s observations on the power of power through the transformation and development of the character Roger and his personality. The more power available to Roger, the more savage he becomes until it reaches a point where he can violently murder a peer and put his head on a stick for all to see and feel no remorse. Power can corrupt even the greatest of men and if a man can have power and not be corrupt, he has passed the ultimate test of character.
William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies shows that humans are bad through ambition. In the book Lord of the Flies Jack wants to be leader over everyone. Jack wants to be in charge of the entire island and have no higher authority than himself.
On the dystopian island of Lord of the Flies, authored by William Golding, one can observe the boy's’ descent into madness. When a group of young children were abandoned on an island without adult supervision, chaos rampaged. This loss civility is most clearly demonstrated by Jack and his effect on others. The text illustrates how quickly he succumbed to the savagery, the way his thirst for power and his dire situation brought him to barbarity, and how the boys followed suit, losing all their humanity.
It is primates’ nature to establish dominance. Power is the ability to have authority and control. This supremacy can alter people’s attitude either negatively or positively. One would imagine English boys displaying etiquette. However when these boys are taken from their English civilization and put into the wild, their animalistic impulses are unveiled as they each vie for power. In the Lord of the Flies, William Golding portrays the idea that when given power, one can be consumed by a controlling attitude. This is revealed when Ralph and Jack face the ultimate battle, man versus man. Golding symbolizes this attitude through the conch, the signal fire, the Lord of the Flies, and the portrayal of Piggy’s death.
The whole entire story could've had an entire different outcome if Jack didn’t have so many personality blemishes. Jack seems like he has something wrong with him as far as handling his emotions go. He is always very mean to Piggy and was the first to thirst for blood.
After being marooned on an unknown, uninhabited island and desperate to survive, the characters in William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies are pushed to the limits of their humanity, and no one is safe from the atrocities from within, not even the seemingly innocent littluns. In an environment where civilization does not exist, the boys of the story attempt to form a society among themselves. Among the group of boys is a young boy who stands out from the rest. Jack Merridew, the leader of the choir boys, strives to take the role of leader of the boys, and he appears to be completely competent. In the beginning, Jack seems to be innocent and civilized. Jack is the cultured leader of the boys’ choir. Although the reader’s first impression of Jack Merridew may be one of an innocent leader eager to be rescued, his true, truculent nature manifests with the development of the novel, and the reader is gripped by Jack’s true schismatic, belligerent, and iconoclastic nature.
The book Lord of the Flies by William Golding is an exhilarating novel that is full of courage, bravery, and manhood. It is a book that constantly displays the clash between two platoons of savage juveniles mostly between Jack and Ralph who are the main characters of the book. The Kids become stranded on an island with no adults for miles. The youngsters bring their past knowledge from the civilized world to the Island and create a set of rules along with assigned jobs like building shelters or gathering more wood for the fire. As time went on and days past some of the kids including Jack started to veer off the rules path and begin doing there own thing. The transformation of Jack from temperately rebellious to exceptionally
Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a novel that represents a microcosm of society in a tale about children stranded on an island. Of the group of young boys there are two who want to lead for the duration of their stay, Jack and Ralph. Through the opposing characters of Jack and Ralph, Golding reveals the gradual process from democracy to dictatorship from Ralph's democratic election to his lack of law enforcement to Jack's strict rule and his violent law enforcement.
Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding is an allegory in novel format about a group of young boys stranded on an island without adults. The story is a microcosm in which Golding reveals his opinions about humanity and the society that has been created. Golding, using an abundance of symbols and themes to show his beliefs on politics, religion and society as a whole. Throughout the story Golding shows that people look at the outer appearance of situations instead of really looking into what is happening. This leads them to making poor decision for society, especially when it comes to leadership. The leaders that are chosen can have a truly damaging effect on the mortality of people and they can even be followed religiously. This is detrimental