Life Of Pi Rhetorical Analysis

889 Words2 Pages

"Richard Parker, it's over. We have survived. Can you believe it? I owe you more gratitude than I can express I couldn't have done it without you. I would like to say it formally: Richard Parker, thank you. Thank you for saving my life. And now go where you must. You have known the confined freedom of a zoo most of your life; now you will know the free confinement of a jungle. I wish you all the best with it. Watch out for Man. He is not your friend. But I hope you will remember me as a friend. I will never forget you, that is certain. You will always be with me, in my heart. What is that hiss? Ah, our boat has touched sand. So farewell, Richard Parker, farewell. God be with you.”(305-306) Proper goodbyes are something Pi needed to have with …show more content…

Pi was focused on Richard Parker and his survival if he did not have Richard Parker he would not have survived because of the emotions and psychology. Richard Parker was the act of humanity for Pi if he did not feel his emotions and did not take care of him; if he was alone... he would have died or gone insane. “Richard Parker, thank you. Thank you for saving my life,” with this, Pi thanked him for not going insane, for being out in the Pacific Ocean with him, not because he actually physically helped him but to keep him stable in the time of need. When they got to the shore, Pi realized that he needed to survive without Richard Parker because he left him without looking …show more content…

Pi, to the reader, was shown as a caring human, his humanity was kind, Pi shows his compassion for Richard Parker “You will always be with me, in my heart” even though the Bangel tiger would have torn him apart if they had the physical approach. Richard Parker showed uncivilized behaviour because of what he is. The tiger has his needs and they are different from a human. The way Richard Parker marooned Pi without a glance towards Pi, demonstrates that he is uncivilized and did not trouble to look at Pi, the one who fed and took care of him. Perspective Pi Patel told the story from his view, his perspective. The reader should have understood Pi’s grieving for Richard Parker in the end. The sympathy created between the reader and Pi should be present because Pi is a believer, a believer in “the harmony of order” (305). Richard Parker did not want to look back at Pi when they hit the shore, he left, and that made the reader think that he was ungrateful and did not feel the need to look back at Pi as if he was nothing and did nothing for him.

Open Document