Is Pi's Story: Fantasy Or Tragedy?

1210 Words3 Pages

Pi’s Story: Fantasy or Tragedy?
In any incident, when there is more than one person present, there’ll be two different versions of one story because everyone perceives things differently. In this case, there’s only one survivor from a lifeboat out at sea, Piscine Molitor Patel (Pi). Once Pi has made it to land after being lost at sea for 227 days, two investigators travel to him, hoping to find what caused the sinking of the Tsimtsum, the ship he was on. When he is asked to share his story of what happened, he has two different versions. One being so unbelievable that you want to believe it, the other being so horrible to hear it makes you pray the other is true. The two stories may have a connection as a way for Pi to come to terms with …show more content…

This story is just as gruesome, however. This story includes Pi’s mother, the ship’s despicable cook, and an injured Japanese sailor. The sailor has a broken leg, and in order to “save him” the cook suggests cutting off his leg; he tells Pi and his mother it will help the sailor to survive. The mother agrees, and helps with the amputation. When the cook doesn’t throw the amputated leg into the ocean, Pi’s mother realizes something is wrong with the cook. They later find out cutting the leg off did not benefit the sailor but actually led to his death (Martel). They also learn that the cook was planning on using the leg as bait for fish. Eventually the cook becomes cannibalistic and eats part of the dead sailor. The cook poses an extremely large threat to both Pi and his mother once this becomes evident. Pi’s state of hunger reaches a state that even he takes part in eating the sailor's leg; this act is made even more grim because Pi is a vegetarian. This version of Pi’s tale also includes the raft as well. When Pi’s mother tries to fight off the cook she urges him to get off of the lifeboat and onto the raft to protect himself. When this happens, Pi watches the cook kill his mother, though he makes no attempt to harm Pi. In the end, Pi kills the cook and has the entire boat to himself. After Pi finishes telling this version, the investigators make a connection that the animals are represented by …show more content…

Pi had most likely made up the first version in order to deal with the trauma from the events he had suffered. Pi may have felt guilty for not trying harder to wake up his brother Ravi. When Pi had woken up from the ship making weird noises he stated, “He looked at me sleepily. He shook his head and turned over, pulling the sheet up to his cheek. Oh, Ravi!” (127). This may have caused Pi to blame himself for his brother not making it. In one instance, Pi admits that the events were taking a toll on him mentally. He stated, “I was getting used to the mental delusion. To make it last I refrained from putting a strain on it; when the lifeboat nudged the island, I did not move, only continued to dream” (324). Version one is very similar to version two in a way. Pi used it as a coping skill so he doesn’t have to deal with how it affected him mentally and emotionally. In version one, each animal represents one of the people aboard. Richard Parker represents the more animalistic side of Pi. He uses Richard to make himself more heroic and seem stronger. In the beginning of the book when Pi states, “In the present circumstances, where Richard Parker would be under tremendous mental strain, fear should have brought out an exceptional level of aggression.” (137), it foreshadows that Pi will be under a great deal of stress. Pi also uses version one to dehumanize the act of cannibalism that took place. Instead of recognizing

Open Document