Legionella Case Study

1052 Words3 Pages

Various recovery techniques for Legionella were used in the methodology of this study. With regards to the sample collected, two primary sample types (water and swab sample) from each faucet were gathered and tested for the presence of the organism. The type of sample which showed a higher isolation rate of Legionella was the swab sample over the bulk water sample. Moreover, the highest CFU/L recorded was also from the swab sample (faucet ). These results could be explained by the fact that Legionellae survive within biofilms, the most likely sample collected when swabbing a faucet compared to flowing water (Rogers JA, et. Al, 1994). In this case, the probability of isolation of the organism increases due to its better survival in biofilms as well as concentrated amount in this material. For the treatment method used, the technique which allowed the highest recovery of the organism was the one using heat treatment. This decontamination process yielded the most number of Legionella isolates from both the swab and …show more content…

organism in the samples. The filtration isolation technique and the treatment methods used to eliminate other microorganisms in the water have an effect in the reduction of few viable Legionella that may be present in the samples. The concentration of the water sample using filtration increased the sensitivity of the method, but not the specificity. According to several studies, filtration brings about a reduction in detectable Legionellae of 16-91% (Brindle et al., 1987; Boulanger and Edelstein, 1995; Ta et al., 1995). While the decontamination with acid buffer and heat, which increased the specificity to Legionella, lead to a decrease in isolated Legionellae between 5 and 99% (Boulanger and Edelstein, 1995; Roberts et al., 1987). The samples may possibly harbor the organism, but the process of filtration and treatment performed may have killed the

Open Document