Lean Startup: Lear Vs. Prototype Vs POC

705 Words2 Pages

1.1.1 MVP vs. Prototype vs. POC
One of the most important questions arising from the last subchapter is how can companies manage uncertainty. In 2011, Eric Ries the author of the book “Lean Startup”, created a framework to accelerate innovation in startup companies. The author defines a startup as “a human institution designed to create something new under conditions of extreme uncertainty” (Ries, 2014, p.31). According to Ries, startups succeed by understanding the needs of their customers. They have to “learn from the customer” and build minimum viable products, which then step by step lead to their marketable end product. Accelerated internal learning cycles, as known from Scrum and Lean Management, can compensate the limited financial resources …show more content…

A POC starts with research and exchange of knowledge among a team, it then turns into a concept, which verifies its functionality, before developing the product (Armour, 2017).
Minimum Viable Product is an end product version reduced to its minimal functions, tested in the market through prototypes. By evaluating MVP with the customer, the company can make changes not only on product level, but they can also find better pricing, distribution and sales strategies as well as marketing methods (Eckert, 2017, p.9).
After proving the feasibility of a concept with a POC and developing first MVPs, prototypes stands in focus. Prototypes are interactive models of the end product, visualizing how the product is working in a beta version. Moreover, prototypes aim to discover errors in the early development process and to adapt functionalities to customer’s requirements by testing and iterating (Gassmann, Frankenberger & Csik, 2017, p.73).
1.2 Competition for …show more content…

Agile methods are iterative, therefore cost- and time-saving. SMEs and big companies can and according to Erik Ries’ (2017) new book “The startup way” should deploy agile methods. Companies have to build their intern “atomic units of work”, meaning to form internal agile teams and let them experiment, exchange and innovate. “Stability not change is the state that is most dangerous in highly dynamic competitive environments”, so McGrath. The author also points out that arenas, not industries are the places to compete. He defines arenas as connections between customers and solutions, which can be entered faster than thought. To make a parallel to the SMEs, they should not be “relaxed” about traditional protections and barriers to enter the market, because competition devolves around highly intangible and emotional factors (McGrath, 2013, p.45). Therefore, Eckert distinguishes between competition for market share and competition for opportunity share. SMEs tend to use the competition for market share, because it is revenue related and lasts as long as possible. Ordinarily, they try to raise their market share by one-dimensional product- and process innovations. Startups have a different approach. Their initial target is to recognize opportunities

Open Document