King Lear Husband

732 Words2 Pages

In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, the servants are easily overlooked and are easily dismissed as unimportant. In Act III Scene VII, the servants play a vital role in understanding the distaste towards the rule of Regan and Goneril. Gloucester is put on an unfair trial by Cornwall and Regan, where they question him about his aid to the fleeing of King Lear and the ‘treasonous’ letter from France. When they are unhappy with Gloucester’s response and loyalty to Lear, they gouge out both of his eyes and leave him to find his own way to Dover, where Lear is. The First Servant’s actions represent the side that was taken when Regan and Goneril were given Lear’s kingdom. In this scene, the Servant’s loyalty to Lear and Gloucester …show more content…

He does not take into account consequences for his actions, rather he acts out of loyalty to Lear and Gloucester. This shows the side he has taken after the falling out between Lear and his daughters, Regan and Goneril, by being disobedient to the new young leaders. The First Servant reacts to the gouging out of Gloucester’s eye, as ordered by Cornwall and Regan. This scene shows the class divide between the peasants and royalty as he mentions his service throughout his whole life to Cornwall, and the free will the servants …show more content…

At first, the First Servant was persuading Cornwall and Regan to stop their mutilation of Gloucester. The First Servant boldly says, “Hold your hand, my lord:” (3.7.79). He is trying to persuade them to stop disrespecting King Lear’s man, however it is in vain as Cornwall and Regan think Gloucester is a traitor and the First Servant is the lower class, so he doesn’t listen. His loyalty to the King and to Gloucester is seen when his tone becomes angry at Regan and Cornwall. Through his anger, he says, “If you did wear a beard upon your chin, I’d shake it on this quarrel.” (3.7.84-85). His decision to challenge Cornwall to a fight shows how deep his loyalty is, that he is willing to die for his former King. His tone returns to a persuasive, almost taunting tone as he says, “...come on, and take the chance of anger.” (3.7.87-88). Here, he is Cornwall on to fight him. The use of the word ‘chance’ could imply that if Cornwall refused to fight his servant, than he would be seen as weak as he may not believe that he could win a fight against a servant. This would be a blow to his masculinity and power, if word got around that he wasn’t even able to fight a

Open Document