King John Pros And Cons

1093 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis essays on the magna carta

LONDON – King John, a king known for his iniquitousness and high taxes, has finally given in to the Barons at their negotiation at Runnymede, near London, only a week ago on the 15th of June 1215 . The Barons forced the king to sign the revolutionary document of laws all people, including the King, have to follow called the Magna Carta because they were sick of the King’s rules and high taxes.
There has been a substantial lead up to the signing of the Magna Carta. King John was crowned King in 1199 , after the death of his older brother Richard, who spent all the money in the treasury during his crusades, giving John a hard time being King. King John is one of most loathed Kings of all time due to his many wrong acts. His controversial acts …show more content…

We as barons will have more power now and I am so happy that the King has signed the Magna Carta.”
But what is in the Magna Carta? Why is it so important? Well, the Magna Carta isn’t just a document of rules. The Magna Carta states that no person is above the law, including the King. This means that even the King has to obey the law and cannot do as he pleases.
However, the Magna Carta is not satisfying everyone’s needs. Mary, wife of Baron Willoughby was not happy about the Magna Carta. At an interview she answered, “This Magna Carta is all about men, he can do this, he can do that. The only times the Magna Carta includes us women is to restrict our rights. For example, clause 54 explains that when we report the death of our husbands nothing will be done! Clause 8 says we can only marry if we get the lord’s consent.”
Rupert, a free man, had this to say about the Magna Carta. “I rather like this idea of a Magna Carta. It states that free men cannot be seized or imprisoned and although many of the clauses only relate to the Barons there are some good clauses that will give us more freedom and more protection of our rights and

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of King George

    277 Words  | 1 Pages

    I really enjoyed this video. It's crazy the amount of informaton that gets packed into a three minute video. I think the cartoon and music that accompanies it helps because you're being entertained as well as informed. I think it's easier for me to remember a fun fact from the video versus reading a whole chapter from a book.

    Read More

  • Comparing Magna Carta And John Locke's Second Treatise On Government

    689 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Magna Carta provides protection for English citizens by limiting the power of the government. This protection can be explained through a parable: Sam Purcell of Sheffield is building a house for his family. On a chilly, November morning the noble that is in charge of Sheffield starts taking wood from Sam’s temporary shed, (where he is building his house,) for his castle. The Magna Carta makes this illegal without the consent of the owner, (31) Neither we nor any royal official will take wood for our castle, or for any other purpose, without the consent of the owner. King John of England undersigned the Magna Carta; this shaped the start of England’s constitutional monarchy. Instead of being an absolute monarchy, King John and his descendants had to abide the laws listed in the charter. Without the Magna Carta, the United States might exist without the constitution or might not exist at

    Read More

  • Foundations of US Government

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Magna Carta was the first document in which English subjects to force English king into power; granting and protecting the subjects’ rights. This was important since the king at the time could do anything that he so desired. However, in practice, this English legal charter did not limit the king’s power. The Magna Carta is the beginnings of American freedom. It is also the foundation of the American Constitution, reflecting English freedom and the power of the English government.

    Read More

  • The Difference between King John I and Queen Elizabeth I

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... above it. John had no plans to honor the agreement, and three months after it was signed, John went back on his work and his signature. As a result, his barons went to war. John did not survive the war though, and he died in 1216 most likely contracted dysentery. John I may not have been quite the evil villain that society knows from the tales of Robin Hood, but he certainly was a terrible King.

    Read More

  • Magna Carta Australia Analysis

    1684 Words  | 4 Pages

    First of all, it was achieved by force. A promise brought about by coercion is rarely considered valid, least of all by the person who was forced to make that promise. King John wanted to keep his crown and was willing to sign any piece of paper in order to do that: he had no intention of keeping the promise his signature gave. In fact, through the pope, John rejected it almost immediately. All this is not to say that rejection and ignorance of this charter makes it completely insignificant, after all, it has remained in politics for hundreds of years. Instead, it is to show that at the time the document was written, the Magna Carta was not legally binding.

    Read More

  • King James II: A Reflection of Autonomy and Responsibility

    2008 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...Bill of Rights, a document that would create a great nation, and be the model for the base of another, guaranteed that the people of England would be autonomous and responsible for themselves. They no longer had to accept the whims of an absolutist. They would have a voice.

    Read More

  • Magna Carta, St. Francis' Admonitions, and Summa Theologica

    865 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Magna Carta was used to put the barons at ease with the king. The Magna Carta was written in 1215 A.D. (167). At the time, King John of England was having trouble with his unruly barons (167). On the surface, it seems that King John was simply trying to give the people some freedoms. From the document, it can be said that the king had been unjustly taking from whom he ruled. “ Neither we, nor our Bailiffs of ours, will take another man’s wood, for our castles or other uses, unless by the consent of him whom the wood belongs”(169). Obviously, that concession would not have been included had not the king or his men been taking wood without consent. The Magna Carta however, is not important for the exact rules or concessions written in it but for other reasons that lie under the surface. The reasons are: The law is even above the king; and the king can be forcefully compelled to obey the law. The most important part of the Magna Carta is the last concession. Summarized, it states that the free people and their kin have the stated rights and they have them forever. No longer can the king take the rights stated in the Magna Carta from the people and no longer can the king be unaware of the law.

    Read More

  • Analyzing Common Sense by Thomas Paine

    1093 Words  | 3 Pages

    The boasted Magna Charta of England, by its very nature, was too complex. Paine lectured that a structure so intricate would only allocate an entire nation to suffer without the country being able to find error in itself. The British hailed their parliamentary system as being the most wonderful, but Paine declared that it was nothing more than the remains of a tyranny. In Paine’s scrutiny Great Britain’s government was made worse by the monarchical king and aristocratical peers whom are designated by heredity. Bequeathed succession only opened the door to foolish, wicked, and improper headship. The British enunciated the House of Commons, in the English Constitution, created a unity to the ordained ruling society and the general population. Conversely, Thomas Paine contended that habitual validation of each component of British foundat...

    Read More

  • King James I: Forceful, Independent And Corrupt Monarchy

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. King James I of England can be described as a forceful, independent and corrupt monarch. As a result of dealing with Puritans, who wanted to get rid of the hierarchical episcopal system of Church governance and replace it with a more representative Presbyterian form that is like the one the Calvinists have, James displayed his forcefulness. At the Hampton Court Conference in 1604, James rejected the Puritans and clearly stated that he wanted to reinforce the Anglican episcopacy. Despite the tensions his actions may have caused, James did what he believed to be right, instead of compromising and possibly coming up with an agreement. James was independent because he didn’t want Parliament to help him, so he seldom asked for their assistance.

    Read More

  • The Exclusionary Rule Protects You From Illegal Search and Seizure

    2489 Words  | 5 Pages

    Early in British history, the establishment of the Magna Carta gave its citizens basic human rights such as the right to a fair trial by jury in circumstances of accused misdemeanor. However, this document allowed “general warrant[s which gave consent to arrest accused criminals but did not have limitations on their search or seizure and that] did not expire until t...

    Read More

  • Dark Ages Benefits

    460 Words  | 1 Pages

    During this time, the Magna Carta was written and signed. This limited the power of the king and he had to earn approval by the lords before he could make a decision. It also made it so a law can only be passed if it doesn’t go against the Magna Carta. It also implies religion by helping with giving the Church full rights that allows

    Read More

  • Historical Characteristics In Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales

    926 Words  | 2 Pages

    This next one is not really meant for literature, it was actually written for a peace treaty between King John of England and a group of rebel barons. It was originally known as the Magna Carta Libertatum. According to this charter, it guarantees protection of the church rights, as well as the protection for the said barons from illegal imprisonment. King John was actually considered to be a terrible king, hence why the barons are against him. One of the reasons is that the King raised his taxes without asking the nobles and it is actually against the law of England.

    Read More

  • King James I: The Monstrous Monarchs Of England

    1168 Words  | 3 Pages

    When it was being read out in church, no shocker, Bishops started to speak out. On June 30th 1688, all seven Bishops were acquitted and boom the King was starting to crumple (“James II”). On the same day that the seven Bishops were acquitted, William of Orange was invited into the picture. The most influential men in the kingdom were getting scared that another civil war would happen under the rule of a Catholic monarch.

    Read More

  • What Is Macbeth A Liar

    442 Words  | 1 Pages

    I have already declared that all my thanes will be promoted to earls and stand by and help me protect the kingdom. I hope you all have enjoyed the ceremony at Scone. I want all my people to know the struggle of trying to be a

    Read More

  • Essay On Magna Carta

    1001 Words  | 3 Pages

    On June 15th, 1215, in a field at Runnymede, King John and the Barons signed The Magna Carta. This was a royal charter drawn up by the barons to insure King John would treat them fairly and equally. This document consisted of political rights and a series of written promises. When the Barons made this document it was there attempt to stop the King from possessing too much power and abusing it.

    Read More

More about King John Pros And Cons

Open Document