Killer Kovat Court Case Study

584 Words2 Pages

Killer Kovat court, on Sunday a student was charged with terrorist threats and acts. I am defending Emily Kikari Sakamoto 21 whom a Emory University student posted on social media that “I'm shooting up the school,” police and university officials said Monday. She was held on $1500 bond in the Newton County Jail. She could face 1-5 years in prison if she's convicted of the single act of plotting terroristic threats, a felony. In an arrest report, Emory police said Sakamoto used YikYak and posted anonymously “ I'm shooting up the school tomorrow. Stay in your rooms. The ones on quad are who will go first. “ The post was live for a few minutes until Emory students took screenshots of it and provided it to the police and she was arrested later on in the afternoon that day. …show more content…

One of the elements is actus reas. Actus reas is an action or conduct that is a constituent element of a crime, as opposed to the mental state of the accused. Nonetheless, it was a false threat and no action was committed thus I believe the charges should be dropped. Another vital element is mens reas. Mens rea is the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused. Indeed, she stated on a social media site that she was going to "shoot up" the school and there are no further evidence that she had plotted it is a major deciding factor as to why I believe she is innocent. Last element is punishment. Punishment is a provision in the law calling for punishment of those found guilty of violating the law as she committed terrorist acts and threats. As stated above, this is found to be not true, she has not committed any action that is considered an terrorist

Open Document