Julius Caesar Flaws

965 Words2 Pages

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, numerous characters interact with omens, prophets, and natural phenomena. From the Soothsayer's warning of the ides of March to crows hovering over the battlefield. However, due to the character’s distinctive traits, the omens are disregarded. Julius Caesar is the leader of Rome, hence feels pressure to appear fearless. Similarly, Marcus Brutus is widely admired for being noble, thus must constantly have high moral standards. Cassius is recognized as a manipulative and dishonest individual, hence has to act submissive towards Brutus in order to gain recognition for the conspiracy. Ultimately, Shakespeare suggests that the protagonist's respective traits lead them towards their tragic fate.
Julius Caesar, an …show more content…

In the beginning, Cassius claims: “Men at some time are masters of their fates: \ The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, \ But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (1.2.150-152). Cassius believes that men have control over their fate, however this is ironic because out of all the characters, he is the least in control. Cassius encounters numerous opportunities which allowed him to alter his fate, nevertheless he choose to respond to these events based on Brutus’s opinions instead of his own. In addition, Cassius is aware that he does not possess positive qualities, therefore decides to manipulate Brutus in joining the conspiracy to bring legitimacy to his actions. Cassius is cautious not to provoke Brutus regardless of that fact that he engenders unfavorable outcomes. Soon after Caesar’s death, Brutus permits Antony to deliver a farewell address even though Cassius objects. Cassius voices his disapproval to Brutus’s decision once more: “Do not consent/ That Antony speak in his funeral/ Know you how much the people may be moved/ By that which he will utter?” (3.1.245-248). Cassius is suspicious of Antony’s sudden reconciliation, yet remains silent when Brutus reasserts that he is adamant about his decision. His compliance undermines the conspirators plan, ultimately costing them their lives. Furthermore, Cassius’ readiness to abandon his beliefs harms the success of the conspirators in battle. When discussing military tactics, Cassius urges for the army to remain in Sardis, but Brutus disagrees and argues that the army should march towards Philippi. Cassius establishes his credibility by mentioning that he is “older in practice” (4.3.37), and believes that his strategy will drain Antony’s soldiers tenacity to fight, allowing Cassius’s troops to be victorious. Nonetheless, Cassius eventually yields to Brutus’s requests even though he recognizes that Brutus’

Open Document