Judicial Branch Essay

475 Words1 Page

1) Madison’s statement means that each branch of government should propose its agendas separate from the other branches. This does not mean that the branches should seek to conflict with one another, but rather that they should propose ideas, based on benefit of the people, within the confines of their own branch. In doing so, it is less likely that the three powers will concentrate, and an efficient system of checks and balances is achieved because each branch can recognize fault in the other without bias.

2) It is less important for the judiciary branch to abide rigorously by the principle of separation because of the qualifications of the job. Membership of the judicial branch has very specific requirements, such as familiarity with governmental …show more content…

The second is personal incentive to encourage those in power to create a government that benefits the people and advances the well being of the country.

4) Madison explains that the abuse of power is inevitable because man, especially when in a position of power, always believes that his agenda is the best and must be carried out even if at the expense of the people. Therefore, the government not only has to control the people, but has to be controlled itself.

5) Madison states that the legislative branch is the most important

6) To reduce concentrated power within the legislative branch, it must be separated into two branches that remain largely uninvolved with one another.

7) The executive branch is the weakest of the authorities, thus it must be fortified.

8) The “compound” refers to the split between two governments, both of which receive their authority and are regulated by the people. In addition to this, the governments regulate each other. Madison also states the importance of to guard one type of society from the other — referring to the rich and poor. With these principles, America is proposing the utmost protection of the people’s

Open Document