John Locke Equality

315 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: John locke the state of nature

Locke believes the state of nature as a state of perfect freedom. The freedom of men is only constrained by the Law of Nature, and individuals can act as they please within its principals. Locke also believed that the state of nature was also a state of equality. This equality was resulting from the natural condition of men, which makes all men equal, so between individuals there was no subordination. Locke also believes that the State of nature is not a state of license. Men are free to do what they can of themselves and make use of their possessions. Men are not allowed to destroy themselves because it goes against the basic law of nature, self-preservation. The law of nature states that one should not harm another in life, liberty, health

Show More
Related

  • Democratic Ideals of John Locke

    737 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Second Treatise of Government John Locke characterizes the state of nature as one’s ability to live freely and abide solely to the laws of nature. Therefore, there is no such thing as private property, manmade laws, or a monarch. Locke continues to say that property is a communal commodity; where all humans have the right to own and work considering they consume in moderation without being wasteful. Civil and Political Societies are non-existent until one consents to the notion that they will adhere to the laws made by man, abide by the rules within the community, allow the ability to appoint men of power, and interact in the commerce circle for the sake of the populace. Locke goes further to state that this could be null in void if the governing body over extends their power for the gain of absolute rule. Here, Locke opens the conversation to one’s natural right to rebel against the governing body. I personally and whole heartily agree with Locke’s principles, his notion that all human beings have the natural right to freedoms and the authority to question their government on the basis that there civil liberties are being jeopardized.

    Read More

  • Equality In The Declaration Of Independence

    743 Words  | 2 Pages

    Women did not benefit from the Declaration of Independence, despite the assertion that the declaration would further equality throughout the nation. The Declaration of Independence did not discuss women’s rights and what Independence would mean for them. Thomas Jefferson did not disclose any information about women in his writing of the declaration. The declaration granted all white males the right to vote, but women did not receive the same right. How can the Declaration of Independence argue that it brought equality when women were not granted equal rights to men? Elaine Crane supports this view and shares the view of Charles Brown in her writings where she writes “Brown argued through his protagonist that the denial of the vote to women violated “pretensions to equality and

    Read More

  • John Adams's View Of Equality And Equality

    1067 Words  | 3 Pages

    The interpretation of freedom can sometimes be viewed differently among people, which creates the pursuit of liberty to be much more arduous. Property, the right to vote, and the color of your skin, all contribute to the equality or inequality we face when searching to create a society based on a populations overall needs and whether or not we have a voice in electing our representatives. Freedom is a burdensome idea that is defined differently among society and leads to several areas of conflict and confusion. Even though people have signed petitions and laws to create freedom, several instances have emerged documenting how freedom and equality are harder to gain. In order to eliminate oppression in any environment, it is necessary to level

    Read More

  • Equality: Comparing Hobbes and Locke

    2000 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hobbes and Locke’s each have different ideologies of man’s state of nature that develops their ideal form of government. They do however have similar ideas, such as how man is born with a perfect state of equality that is before any form of government and social contract. Scarcity of goods ultimately leads to Hobbes and Locke’s different states of nature that shapes their two different ideal governments because Hobbes believes that scarcity of goods will bring about a constant state of war, competition, and greed of man that cannot be controlled without a absolute sovereign as government while Locke believes that with reasoning and a unified government, man will succeed in self preservation of himself and others.

    Read More

  • John Locke and the Unequal Distribution of Wealth

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is stated by John Locke that in the state of nature no man may take more then he can consume. “…make use of any advantage of life before it spoils…whatever is beyond this is more than his share and belongs to others. Nothing was made by God for man to spoil or destroy. (Locke 14)” Locke then goes on to say, “God gave the world to man … for their benefit and the greatest conveniences of life they were capable to draw from it, it cannot be supposed he meant it should always remain common and uncultivated. He gave it to the use of the industrious and rational- and labor was to be his title… (Lock 15)”

    Read More

  • John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    Locke believes that humans inherently possess complete and inalienable equality in the state of nature. “A state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another; there being nothing more evident, than that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another. ”2 Locke suggests that a civil government has an obligation to treat its citizens equally because humans are equal in the state of nature, and it would be both morally wrong and difficult to find willing subjects if they are denied equality under the government’s rules. authority.

    Read More

  • Locke, Hobbes, Mill, Thoreau

    1432 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke explains the state of nature as a state of equality in which no one has power over another, and all are free to do as they please. He notes, however, that this liberty does not equal license to abuse others, and that natural law exists even in the state of nature. Each individual in the state of nature has the power to execute natural laws, which are universal.

    Read More

  • Political Science Final Exam

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    Locke believes that state of nature is pre-political but at the same time it is not pre-moral. He believes that everyone i...

    Read More

  • John Lock´s Theories of Human Nature vs. Jean-Jacques Rousseau´s Theories

    1256 Words  | 3 Pages

    The State of Nature is a state of complete freedom for an individual to go about his or her life as they see fit. Yet, they don't have absolute freedom, they cannot do anything at all that they please. In my book I said, “"to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature” (Locke, 262). Humans have no government or rulers of any sort to dictate the individual’s needs and desires. One cannot be punished for doing as he pleases, because the individual only obeys himself and the Law of Nature. The Law of Nature is similar to your morals, humans resist from harming others and only take what they need. This is why, in the State of Nature, ...

    Read More

  • John Locke's Two Treatises Of Government

    2207 Words  | 5 Pages

    Locke suggests man entering a civil society to preserve oneself and abandon the state of nature. Locke elucidated the state of war “a state of Enmity and Destruction” and in this state of war, all natural laws are neglected. Man is Hence, the natural laws are disregarded, Locke mentions he state of war has its own law “Declaration of War” These acts of violence men no longer have any reasoning, “…have no other Rule, but that of Force and Violence… may be treated as Beasts of Prey.” The state of war can also resort to man being enslaved by another man revoking his natural law of liberty. The state of war places a fear upon Locke because man is able to take away liberties without consent from the other party. This act of oppression does not preserve the equality of all men. Locke mentions that man has much more to gain by consenting to a formal

    Read More

  • Moral Economy in Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and Locke’s Second Treatise of Government

    3072 Words  | 7 Pages

    Locke theorizeds extensively on property, privatization, and the means an individual can use for increasing his property. Initially, in the state of nature, man did not own property in the form of resources or land. All fruits of the earth were for the use of all men,“and nobody has originally a private dominion, exclusive of the rest of mankind, in any of them, as they are thus in their natural state” (Locke 353). In this state, people could appropriate only what they could make use of. It was unfair for one person to take more than he could use because some of that natural commodity would go to waste unless another man might have made use of it for his own benefit (360). Locke felt that God gave the bounties of nature to the people of earth and they, by default, should treat these bounties rationally. This rationalistic theory discourages waste.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on Natural Rights

    919 Words  | 2 Pages

    to everything. For Locke you can't just go into the state of nature and just kill someone; unlike Hobbes, you have to preserve your neighbor unless it's your life at stake, then you must p...

    Read More

  • John Locke Equality

    676 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Locke is a political philosopher who is known as the Father of Enlightenment. Locke’s scholarly works of the eighteenth century still remains significantly influential in our society today. When Locke discusses the relationship between property and government in, The Two Treaties of Government, he defines property as the protection of people as well as their goods and individuals should have the right to own as much property as they desire. On the other hand, Government should have limited access to a person’s property and is only placed into society to keep the rebellious state of nature in order. Locke highlights a State of Equality where power and jurisdiction is reciprocal and everyone citizen within society has the same power and

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The State Of Nature And Human Nature

    1491 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Second Treatise of Government, Locke describes that the pre-contract state of society is the state of nature where peace and harmony prevailed and every individual is born free. Locke’s account of the state of nature is a similar interpretation of democracy, where all people are born with certain inalienable rights. Moreover, Locke believes that in this state of nature men have true freedom to do and act as they please. In Locke’s state of nature, men honour their obligations and respect one another. According to Locke (1690), the state of nature is “a state of perfect freedom [for all] to order their actions […]” as they shall please (p. 8). Accordingly, Locke believes that liberty and freedom are most important for a good life (Lam, 2007, p. 66). Although violent conflicts are minimal due to the imposition of laws and law enforcers, this state is chaotic. Therefore, individuals give up a portion of their freedom to the state in order to secure a civilized society, where law and order are protected by the state. Locke’s state of nature is different from Hobbes’ concept of the natural condition in that Locke (1690) believes that “in the state of nature every one has the executive power of the law of nature” (p. 12). In the Second Treatise of Government, Locke describes that the pre-contract state of society is the state of nature where peace and harmony prevail and

    Read More

  • Kant's Arguments On The Relationship Between Nature And Freedom

    508 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nature is freedom, it knows no boundaries. Bronislaw Malinowski wrote, "Freedom is a symbol which stands for a sublime and powerful ideal.” The state of nature is a term in political philosophy that describes a circumstance prior to the state and society's establishment. John Locke, whose work influenced the American Declaration of Independence, believes that the state of nature is the state where are individuals are completely equal, natural law regulates, and every human being has the executive power of the natural law. Nature is the very essence of freedom, and freedom is the essence of singularity. An Infinite and Unbound Singularity would require infinite and unbound degrees of freedom. Each individual mind represents an infinite degree of freedom separated by Nothing but its own Perspective. Just as there is Nothing that separates one spatial dimension from the other but the perspective view. The height, weight, and depth of our spatial dimensions are interchangeable, and are only defined by our current point of view. Rotate them by 90 or 180 degrees in any direction and one be...

    Read More

More about John Locke Equality

Open Document