Jesus At A Dinner Party Analysis

1447 Words3 Pages

To explain the role of the Jewish people in the death of Jesus at a dinner party is an extremely daunting task. This task is made increasingly imposing by the entrenched beliefs of the members of the dinner party. The role of Jews in the death of Jesus Christ is a nuanced issue that requires the discussion of two millennia of religious history, as well as an analysis of the historicity of the Gospels themselves. To explain this complicated history to a man who appears to be a faithful, unquestioning Christian (Ted) and a devout Jew (Susan) I must first address the historicity of the Gospels themselves, especially regarding the attribution of the Christ’s crucifixion to Jewish leadership and the removal of blame from Pontius Pilate. Then, I …show more content…

Both these passages describe the choice of citizens to spare Barabbas and crucify Jesus, motivated by the persuasions of Jewish chief priests and elders. Both passages also make note of the fact that Pilate refuses to condone this choice and questions what crime Jesus has committed. He then proceeds to “wash his hands” of the incident, and place blame of Jesus’ death on the Jews. The Jews accept the blame, saying “his blood is on us and our children.” Pilate agrees that Jesus is innocent in both Luke and John as …show more content…

As noted in Mary Boys writing, Hitler viewed the Passion narratives as a prime example of “the menace of Jewry.” Anti-Semitic teachings were widely celebrated in Nazi Germany. Jews were viewed as responsible for the death of Christ by even anti-Nazi authors, such as Romano Guardini. Nazis espoused the idea that by rejected Jesus and bringing about his crucifixion, Jews had rejected God himself. According to Boys, Nazis did not necessarily view Jesus as a Jew himself, but as a man whose existence exposed the flaws of Jewish society and caused their nation to fall out of favor with

Open Document