Jeff Jacoby Bring Back Flogging Summary

822 Words2 Pages

Whipping a painful and humiliating punishment that has been used in humanity's past, but what if we brought it back? Jeff Jacoby published a piece calling for the return of flogging as corporal punishment in the United States, the piece fairly straightforwardly titled “Bring back Flogging”. Is this a beneficial possibility, and if so why may we want to see it brought back from its current unintegration from our society's punishment? Jacoby’s “Bring back Flogging” discusses use of corporal punishment in our nation's history and argues for its return in the place of some modern methods of punishment. Jacoby cites the cost of current punishment methods to taxpayers being too high, the public humiliation of flogging, the moral ethicacy of whipping over imprisonment, and to quote Jacoby the idea that “Crime is out of control” as reasons supporting his claim. I do not agree with Jacoby’s claim as he does not provide any sound evidence or cite sources to reinforce the majority of his statements. Because of this it is of my opinion being a responsible informed and passionate citizen that corporal punishment is horrific and has no …show more content…

This is by far the easiest to shut down of Jacoby claims, because the Eighth Amendment of the united States Constitution states “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”. Regardless of whether or not whipping would be defined as an unusual punishment it is most certainly and undoubtedly cruel, and for those who would receive it as a punishment It could lead to long-term injuries. There is also the possibility that an individual who has been convicted of a crime could have a health condition that may cause their whipping sentence to turn in a death sentence, and though that individual example may be slightly hyperbolic whipping would undoubtedly be a health risk to convicted

Open Document