Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sartre and existentialism essay
Jean paul sartre existentialism
Sartre and existentialism essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sartre and existentialism essay
Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) is referred to as the most popular existentialist of the twentieth century and was born out of the third force movement in psychology. The third force movement of the twentieth century consisted of a diverse collection of psychologists and philosophers that did not all share universal principles, but were all reacting to the new orientation of psychology, which differed from behaviorism in that it did not reduce psychological processes to reactions to mechanical laws of physiological events but acknowledged the mediating and active role of the mind (Brennan, 2003). Despite the diversity of the third force movement, there were commonly shared views amongst its pioneers. One of these views was the focus on personal freedom and responsibility in terms of decision making and fulfilling ones potential (Brennan, 2003). The mind was considered to be active, and dynamic and a place where an individual could express their uniquely human abilities of cognition, willing, and judgments (Brennan, 2003). There was an emphasis on the self, and an acknowledgement of the strive of humans toward individually defined personality development. Existentialism holds that an individual is free to define his or her life course through his or her choices and decisions, but individuals are responsible for the consequences of their personal choices and decisions, and therefore freedom is a burdensome source of anguish (Brennan, 2003).
At the core of Jean-Paul Sartre’s views was that existence precedes essence. This contrasted with the Aristotelian and Scholastic views that individual existence is an expression of essence or being (Brennan, 2003). Instead, Sartre believed that existence defines the essence of an individual such ...
... middle of paper ...
...s they are in actuality. Part of the committed action of ACT is for clients to define goals in specific areas along their valued life path, and then act on the goals while anticipating psychological barriers (Hayes, 2004). Clients are encouraged to take responsibility for the patterns of actions that result from their committed action goals. Sartre states that we have total and deep responsibility in every decision that we make, such that if we decide to commit ourselves to “truthfulness”, we will impose a truthful standard on ourselves and have to take responsibility for this standard. Finally, the idea that we can only rely on ourselves and must accept our cognitions to increase our psychological flexibility in ACT, is similar to Sartre’s idea that we only have responsibility to ourselves and must guide ourselves through our ability to make decisions and choices.
The key belief of existentialists is that existence precedes essence. In order to understand that claim we must first understand what Jean- Paul Sartre means by the term “essence.” He gives an example of a person forging a paper-cutter. When an individual sets out to make any object, he/she has a purpose for it in mind and an idea of what the object will look like before beginning the actual production of it, so this object has an essence, or purpose, before it ever has an existence. The individual, as its creator, has given the paper-cutter its essence. Using the paper cutter example, Sartre argues that human beings cannot have an essence (or purpose) before their “production,” becaus...
Since existentialism is the philosophy above all other philosophies which takes seriously the concrete existence of a human in all of its facticity, anxiety, temporality, and fleshliness, and will place this existence before all decisions about essence, it would seem that above all others we can expect from Sartre a philosop...
Existentialism is a philosophical theory or approach that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will. To Sartre, saying that som...
Sartre looked at essence and questioned what if we are born first and then create our essence? Instead of god or some outside ideas or
Through the despair brought upon parts of the world by the second world war arose the concept of existential philosophy. The existential philosopher Jean-Paul Satre argued that individuals must define the conditions of their own existence and choose to act ethically even in a world without God (Sayre, 2010). The concept of existentialism puts every man in control of his life, with the opportunity to control a portion of his existence more than any other individual. The act of self-reflection and interpretation translated into very retrospective art. M.C. Escher's "Hand With Reflective Sphere" expresses the very essence of what existentialism is, a reflection upon one's life while trying to decide what it means to exist.
Sartre’s argument for the claim that without God, a person is “nothing else but what he makes of himself,” is based in the Age of Forlornness. According to the philosopher, the existence of God is impossible, since the very concept of God is contradictory, because it would be the achieved in-itself-for-itself. Therefore, if God does not exist, he has not created man according to an idea that fixes his essence, so that man meets his radical freedom. This theory has an ethical consequence: Sartre affirms that values depend entirely on man and are his own creation. Man is condemned to be free and to take responsibility for this freedom, nothing else can force him
John Paul Sartre is known as one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century. He wrote many philosophical works novels and plays. Much of his work is tied into politics. The essay Existentialism is a Humanism is just one of his many works. Existentialism is a Humanism is a political essay that was written in 1945. Its purpose was to address a small public during World War II in Nazi occupied France. This essay stressed the public not to conform. Sartre introduced a great number of philosophical concepts in Existentialism. Two of these concepts are anguish and forlornness. They are simply defined, as anguish is feeling responsible for yourself as well as others and knowing that your actions affect others and forlornness is realizing that you are alone in your decisions. These two concepts are interwoven throughout the essay and throughout many of Sartre's other works. Sartre's view of anguish and forlornness in Existentialism is a Humanism addresses his view of life and man.
Sartre’s existentialist ideas are mostly closely tied to the theory of free will. If existence precedes essence, that is if there is no purpose to why we are here, this grants humans ultimate free will (and ultimate responsibility) to create themselves, the world and fill it with meaning. I disagree with Sartre’s claim that existence precedes essence, and furthermore that free will can still exist outside these boundaries.
However, considering Atheistic Existentialism, it can be supposed that there is no God to have a conception of man, then man is the only embodiment of which existence precedes essence (Sartre 600). He further develops and even attempts to justify his claims by clinging to the philosophical ideas of the enlightenment, in which society abandoned the ideas of God and divinity, but did not abandon the idea of an essence prior to existence. With this dialogue, Sartre places power back into the hands of humanity; by developing a philosophy of life and existence, he makes for himself an undeniable truth to live
Sartre’s view that existence precedes essence, is that man, being humans, have to live and do things in their life to define who they are as a person. Without experiencing life, there’s no way a person can determine what type of person they want to be or are. Only the person can decide what type of human they want to be. This is a little different from essence preceding existence because with essence preceding existence, it means that all humans have an instinct. That instinct defines all men, people. Each person’s character is an example of the universal idea of how a human should be. Sartre thinks we are free because human didn’t make ourselves, and that because humans are in charge of their own lives, they are free because they can do
Sartre took the Husserl’s idea of consciousness being inseparable from the world itself, and developed his own philosophy in which he considered material reality as knowable and concrete but humans, on the other hand, cannot be deduced in the same way. Sartre believed that is was a human’s presence that ultimately gave physical reality a vehicle for defining itself (Roca and Schuh 224). Sartre is also known for his remarkable work towards woman’s rights and inequalities of every kind that were relevant then and of greatest importance
ABSTRACT: Of all the German idealists, Jean-Paul Sartre refers the least to Fichte-so little in fact that there have been long-standing suspicions that he was not even familiar with Fichte's writings. It is perhaps ironic, then, that Fichte's writings are as helpful as they are for clarifying Sartre's views, especially his views on subjectivity and inter-subjectivity. Here I want to look closely at a key concept in Fichte's mature writings: the concept of the Anstoss, a concept which Dan Breazeale has called "Fichte's original insight." Fichte introduces the Anstoss, or "check," to explain why the I posits the world as it does. In effect, the Anstoss is the occasion of the facticity of the I. I will show that his concept can be uniquely helpful in understanding the role the body plays in Sartre's theory of inter-subjectivity. The importance of Sartre's account of the body for his theory of subjectivity and inter-subjectivity has been chronically under-appreciated by his interpreters; this comparison is the beginning of an attempt to rectify that. In turn the concept of the Anstoss provides a means for analyzing the necessary differences between any Sartrean and Fichtean ethics based on their respective accounts of inter-subjectivity.
Sartre and his existentialist philosophy have been subjects of curiosity for me for years. Only recently, after taking a philosophy class, have I begun to grasp some of the major principals of existentialism. Though I'm unsure about some of the peripheral arguments and implications of existentialism, the core of the system appeals strongly to me: Human beings are themselves the basis of values and meaning, and in this sense values are real--evolving, developing, and real. Existentialism places the individual at the center of things, gives him a sense of empowerment and responsibility, and erects a bridge on which Man can find his way out of many of the traps and snares he constructs for himself. Sartre's character in the play "No Exit," Orestes, finds such freedom and, in a humanist sense, is one of the most enviable characters I encountered in this course.
As well, he defined freedom as we are free to make our own choices, but we are condemned to always bear the responsibility of the consequences of these choices. We are in this world helpless, without any creator who forced us to make our own choices and to bear their consequences. Sartre also claims that as an individual we are not free to be free since we are condemned to be free. Sartre claims that God is dead and there is no one who none command us. Sartre affirmed that all the way of life , we should find significance in our being . We are responsible for our own lives and the way we live it does define who we are. Sartre uses the main idea of existentialism as "existence precedes essence," he says that we have the choice in everything we do. Our "essence" is not something that is established before us, we should it by ourselves. His philosophy is that human beings exist first, and then can own a freedom that he decided who he wants to become.
Jean-Paul Sartre views human nature as potentially free. Moreover, he asserted the idea of “nothingness” as a central concept in this discussion highlighting the multitude of possibilities. It is important to elucidate that Sartre’s “nothingness” is not a vacuum emptiness, on the contrary, the idea is indefiniteness, incompleteness, infiniteness. It means that a person constantly faces a number of choices, and reveals his/her nature, both positive and negative, in them (Kupperman, 2010:155). Though the philosopher’s theory is not associated with determinism, Sartre appears to be quite fatalistic in stating that it is impossible to escape from freedom, but at the same time what he means is that a person is completely unpredictable in his/her behavior. However, Sartre also indicates certain human preferences that often predetermine the respective choices, and thus he also asserts that human behavior can often be predictable. Still, there is a point when a person can make the so-called “existential choice”, which is made sensibly and intentionally by a person in certain circumstances. By stating this, it is clear that Sartre completely rejects the element of unconscious influence on the choices that people make. In order to understand Sartre’s view of human identity, it is reasonable to account for his asserti...