Isolationism During Ww2

915 Words2 Pages

Leading up to and during World War II, there were differing points of view about how to approach the war. Some believed in interventionism, where the United States would get deeply involved in the war. On the other hand, there is isolationism, where the United States establishes its policy to stay out of foreign affairs as much as possible. With the nation being sucked into the war, lawmakers had to make the decision on where the country would stand. Even after the war was over, all the way up to present day issues, the discussion continued. The debate between interventionism and isolationism was relevant during World War II and still is today. Many people thought the United States should become involved in World War II while the nation still …show more content…

Franklin D. Roosevelt gave a speech at the San Diego Exposition in 1935 about isolationism. There he said “In the face of this apprehension the American people can have but one concern-the American people can speak but one sentiment: despite what happens in continents overseas, the United States of America shall and must remain, as long ago the Father of our Country prayed that it remain-unentangled and free.” George Washington spoke about the dangers of interventionism, and Roosevelt is referring to that in this speech. Our founding fathers had always carried out a policy of isolationism and Roosevelt wants to continue his policy. This would change in the coming years, but in 1935 it appeared to be best for the nation. In Roosevelt’s 1937 Quarantine the Aggressor speech he said “It is my determination to pursue a policy of peace. It is my determination to adopt every practicable measure to avoid involvement in war.” He wants for the United States to remain independent and isolated. He goes on to say that if the only way to do that is through intervention then so be it. However, it is still best for the United States to adopt the policy, implemented long ago, that is

Open Document