Is There Any Justification To Racial Profiling?

743 Words2 Pages

Racial profiling is, undoubtedly, one of the more controversial issues that has been popping up in the past few years. Trayvon Martin’s murder is easily the first issue that comes to mind. Then there was a subtle-yet-poignant internet campaign against New York’s Stop-and-Frisk system, forcing officers to start trouble and accuse randomly for the sake of their jobs. And even more recently, the young man who bought an item at a high-profile store and was immediately questioned and arrested without any true proof of crime by police; keep in mind that these examples are only related to African-Americans and that there have been many more cases of this going on, especially with the Hispanic community. But is there a possible reason for this blatant racism to continue?
First of all, we have to look at motifs. Why would people want to racially profile? As I was saying with the New York Stop-and-Go system, the officers have to perform such drastic measures in order to A. keep their job and B. make the NYPD’s arrest rates go up so that they look productive. Naturally, this gets everyone big raises and lots of recognition and awards, but in the end, multiple races are suffering from this. And now some people are honestly convinced that the stop-and-go system works because of these technically faked numbers.
The new New York mayor is now wanting to reform the policy and include even MORE racial profiling enforcement then there was before, and that is all because it makes the NYPD look really good. But now that a good number of people know this, people now think the NYPD is even more corrupt and ruined than it was in previous years. In the end, it was not worth it. Not one bit. One step forward and two steps back.
So far, our evidence is poin...

... middle of paper ...

...ey asked them multiple questions about children, like “How much do *AGE*-year old *RACE* children need protection?” or “How much are *AGE*-year old *RACE* children a danger to themselves?”
As predicted, most said that the black children were less innocent than white children. Results were about the same from age zero to age ten, but after that is when there’s a noticeable change. Black children are perceived as innocent one step below white and other children afterwards (eg. 10-13 year old black kids are considered as innocent as a 14-17 not black kid), which can imply some unforeseen consequences for black children who are prosecuted in the future. What do we do when the possible judges and lawyers of the future use their prejudices-whether they be intentional or not-against their darker skinned peers? The answer worries me as much as it should hopefully worry you.

Open Document