Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Death penalty and deterrence
Impact of capital punishment
Opinions on death penalties
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Death penalty and deterrence
Imagine laying on a table awaiting your lethal injection to die, people watching from behind the glass. You killed someone so you deserve it, don’t you? The death penalty should be legal as a form of punishment. It’s not fair for someone to kill another person or more than one person and either get away with it, or sit in jail living their life. They deserve to die just like the person they murdered.
It’s unfair for murderers to stay alive in jail rather than die for their crime. Criminals should suffer the same death that they did to others rather than live the rest of their lives. For a huge proportion this would instantly rob them of every last ember of hope and increase by up to 20% the number of inmates who will grow old and die. ( Is Life in Prison without Parole a Better Option Than the Death Penalty?) It’s a law that, whoever murders in the first degree can be put on death row and killed for their actions. (18 U.S. Code § 1111 - Murder) Also, murderers can kill again in prison. The death penalty is necessary in these cases. (Is Life in Prison without Parole a Better Option Than the Death Penalty?)
Victims and/or victims’ families feel a sense of relief and closure. Studies cast doubt on
…show more content…
(CNN: Does death penalty bring closure?) “She felt comforted to know he will be put to death.” said the woman’s aunt who was stabbed to death. Also, a 2008 study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that people who were taken advantage of financially by someone else thought they would feel better if they exacted revenge. “It’s justice.” Fred Romano said, who’s sister was beaten & killed. “It’s not revenge.” (CNN: Does death penalty bring closure?) After criminals are killed, victims and/or families of victims feel
Many people are led to believe that the death penalty doesn’t occur very often and that very few people are actually killed, but in reality, it’s quite the opposite. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1,359 people have been executed as a result of being on death row since 1977 to 2013. Even though this form of punishment is extremely controversial, due to the fact that someone’s life is at stake, it somehow still stands to this very day as our ultimate form of punishment. Although capital punishment puts murderers to death, it should be abolished because killing someone who murdered another, does not and will not make the situation any better in addition to costing tax payers millions of dollars.
In the movie Dead Man Walking, Earl Delacroix, the father of a murder victim, is seen at the funeral of the murderer, Matthew Poncelet, after his execution. While there, he says that he hasn’t found the peace he thought he would have after Matthew was executed and that his heart was still filled with hatred (Dead Man Walking.) This is the case for many families, capital punishment may give the impression that the murder victim’s family gains closure from the execution of the murderer, but that is rarely the case; even years after the execution has taken place, some family members of the victim suffer from unresolved grief and the murderer’s family is also affected in a negative manner. Capital Punishment is often viewed as the “right” option to put the families out of their pain and suffering, but in many cases, it’s just not effective in providing closure for the families and might make things worse; therefore, it should not be a valid reason for execution.
Justice should be served, but I don’t understand how killing someone who killed someone else brings justice. I feel that execution is the easy way out. A better form of punishment is keeping a criminal in prison, where they will have to live the rest of their lives knowing they committed a crime. Living with guilt is a far better punishment. Not to mention those who, as I stated before, are convicted innocently or those who are sentenced to death wrongfully.
The United States should use the death penalty because it is economical and continues to be a deterrent for potential offenders. Take into consideration that the Constitution states that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness can not be taken away without due process. The offenders committing the brutal, heinous crimes have not applied this right to the victims of their crimes. Why should the government take their rights into consideration when the victims rights mean so little to them? People always put forth the idea that killing is wrong in any sense, yet they don’t want to punish the people that commit the crimes.
Using capital punishment would put an end to the killer’s suffering, and let him leave the world peacefully. With the death penalty in place, the victim’s family can finally get closure. Families that have been through the intense experience of losing a loved one might call for lex talionis, or eye for an eye. They could believe that the killer took their loved one from them and the only acceptable recourse would be to take the murderer’s life. This retaliation for the family might be the most important reason to instill the death penalty in today’s
Eliminating the death penalty as a method of punishment will only allow criminals to wreak havoc and chaotic in our community without the fear of death. When a person commits a crime, they are disrupting the order in the community. Justice help restore the disruption of that order. The Death penalty restore social order and give the states authority to maximized retribution for the victims. When the state does not have the authority to maximum retribution, the public may put the law in their own hands. Although, execution may be cruel and inhumane, it is nothing compared to the fate of many victims in the hand of the murderers. The purpose of the death penalty is to provide retribution for the victims and their families. However, retribution is not revenge. “Vengeance signifies inflicting harm on the offender out of anger because of what he has done. Retribution is the rationally supported theory that the criminal deserves a punishment fitting the gravity of his crime” (Pojman, 2004).
Cases end up in life sentences in jail. The goal is to end all cases, for murdering someone, to life sentences.
Many who disagree with the death penalty believe it is immoral, discriminates, is very expensive, increases crime, and is only a way to carry out revenge. This, however, is not true. Capital punishment should be legal because it is moral, by not allowing criminals to roam the streets once again. It does not discriminate against those of color or the poor, and is actually less expensive than life imprisonment. The most important reason why the death penalty should be legal is because it deters crime.
Klaas isn’t the only one whose first step of healing is to have the perpetrator executed for murdering a relative. “In 2001, there were more than 500 stories per year that claimed capital punishment gave their family closure with the death of a loved one.” Nancy Berns, a sociologist professor at Drake University, researched various healing methods of families who have had someone close to them murdered. She explains what she calls “new retribution” as a method of healing for those who have experiences a loved one murdered. “The healing process beings with the death of the killer, this provides closure and allows families to move on.”
Eaton, Judy, Tony Christensen. “Closure and its myths: Victims’ families, the death penalty, and the closure argument.” International Review of Victimology, Vol 20(3).Sep, 2014. : pp. 327-343.
...st “end the death penalty”. There must still be a punishment inflicted upon those who deviate from the understanding that killing is wrong and the punishment must be strong enough to discourage others. I feel that the most effective punishment is complete social and sensory isolation, as well as life in prison. The punishment is not about inflicting pain or exacting revenge, it is about forcing the killer to stew in their own doing and be cut off from any form of enjoyment whatsoever. Anyone could agree that being deprived of even the simplest of pleasures is indeed the worst punishment one could endure aside from death. This also removes killers from society permanently. While I believe that it is wrong to relieve someone of their basic human rights, I feel that it is justified to relieve them of their legal rights if it is for the betterment and safety of society.
Sometimes people often wonder why certain things happen, or sometimes often wonder why certain things had to happen to them out of everyone else. A lot of people go insane or depressed over the lost of a loved one. The sad part about this though is that they didn’t just die from old age or cancer, they died from something much worse they got murdered. A lot of people don’t know how to react to such a horrible tragedy. Some people try to seek revenge or try to get closure from losing somebody so unexpectedly but for the states that don’t have the death penalty, not all get that closure or comfort. The death penalty has always been one of the most hotly debated issues in the United States.
There are always two sides to every issue and capital punishment or life imprisonment is no different. This has been a very controversial issue for decades and still is today. Capital Punishment also known as the death penalty is defined as being the penalty of death for a crime. Some feel that capital punishment should be abolished because it is cruel; others believe life in prison is just as cruel. There are many reasons for the support of Capital Punishment and for Life in Prison.
Secondly, many believe that capital punishment is right because of the justice given to the victim’s family. These family members feel l...
Proponents of the death penalty are right to argue that capital punishment does provide a sense of “closure” to those who are faced with the tragedy of losing a loved one due to homicide, but they exaggerate when they claim that this is the only means by which murderers receive just punishment for their crimes. Advocates of the death penalty fail to recognize that there are alternative methods – such as psychotherapy – that are able to replace the barbaric method of the death penalty.