Is Kane's Five Different Ways Of Parenting Based On Gender?

598 Words2 Pages

Kane displays five different ways of parenting based on gender. She first introduces us to the Naturalizers. Naturalizers practice traditional values when raising their child. They believe in the concept of “it was how they were born” (Kane, 2012. p. 53). The mere definition explains to us that the biological outlooks outweigh the social outlooks. Naturalizers believe that differences are vital to gender. Next, the reader learns of a group named Cultivators. Cultivators believe that gender is socially constructed in the parents influence. Although this is deemed true by them, Kane shows the reader how Cultivators still adhere to the traditional value of young men but are okay with young women being nontraditional (taking out trash, doing …show more content…

Kane then points the readers into the group of Refiners. They believe that social standards and those relating to gender should be equal. The reader then learns of Innovators. Innovators believe that social standards outweigh the biological standards. Although innovators are similar to the Refiners, they go through greater lengths to prove their theory (Kane, 2012). They often tend to follow their children’s preferences. Lastly, the reader learns about the parenting group named Resisters. Resisters truly believe in allowing social norms to influence their parenting; they do not base their decisions primarily on gender. They feel the necessity to steer their children away from the notions of gender. All five of the groups demonstrate the different approaches to expressing and talking about gender. Once I read of the different varieties of parenting; I realized my mother used the beliefs of Cultivators as a guide to parenting. Just like Maya, my family lived in a poverty struck community. The influences my mother had were both from social factors as well as biological factors. Because of being impoverished, there were times social factors became more essential. For

Open Document