Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women during war and conflict
Roles of women in combat civil war
Women during war and conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women during war and conflict
For this essay the two films that were chosen to compare and contrast were Inglourious Basterds and Fury. Inglourious Basterds directed by Quentin Tarantino, and Fury directed by David Ayer, are two films that take place in Europe during World War II. Both of these films depict Brad Pitt as a leader of men who are fighting for the United States trying to defeat Nazi Germany. Although both films Inglourious Basterds and Fury display the gritty, brutal, life of soldiers and civilians during World War II, but they both do it in two totally different ways. My goal in this easy is to provide examples of how both Inglourious Basterds and Fury are both similar and different at the same time. When it comes to Fury and Inglourious Basterds it is completely obvious that Fury is the most realistic one even though it is a fictional depiction of the things that happened during the war, while Inglourious Basterds in my opinion is more of a comical and fictional version of some of the things that took place during WWII. Even though both films are fictional depictions of the war they both give the audience a sense of the harshness that the soldiers went through and the gruesomeness of war. The scene in Fury when Irma and her cousin Emma are …show more content…
From the beginning of each the movies to the end of them the audience knows that the main theme is war. The movies approach the theme in two totally different ways though. Inglourious Basterds approaches the took in a way that is serious, but also comical at the same time. This gives the audience the experience of war, but also keeps them in a more light hearted mode while watching the movie. Fury on the other hand doesn’t take that approach. The movie takes a more serious look at war and wants the audience to truly understand the pain suffering that the civilians and the soldiers went through while they fighting in one of the most ruthless wars in the history of our
The Outsiders and The Wednesday Wars deal with misunderstandings among young people in the 1960’s and show how people can form friendships despite their differences. The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton is about two rival gangs, the Greasers and Socs. Ponyboy Curtis and some Greasers befriend Cherry Valance, a Soc. She spies on the Socs and helps out the Greasers. Ponyboy and his friend, Johnny Cade, become involved with the killing of a Soc, so they run away to an abandoned church. When the church catches on fire, Ponyboy, Johnny, and their friend Dallas Winston, save a few children who were trapped in the burning building. Johnny gets injured during the process and later dies. The boys are mentioned in the newspaper as heroes. The
Fury focuses more on the bad side of war it shows the gruesome deaths, the dead bodies of fallen soldier scattered everywhere, and even the frustration a soldier has in the worst of times. The film depicts what war is really about and doesn’t fall into the same cliché many war movies do. The first scene in Fury starts with Sgt. Collider getting out of his tank and killing an enemy soldier in sight, while in the background you can see the result of a warfare with destroyed tanks and dead
Even though the films “Battleship Potemkin”, “From Here to Eternity” and “Saving Private Ryan” are all movies based on military life during war time the variation in time periods and culture made each film very different. These differences did not take away from the impact the films had on their audiences at the time or the messages they were each trying to covey. The Horrific images and hear wrenching scenarios helped to evoke strong emotions and patriotic feeling from audiences allowing film makers to pass along their truths. Thru these films we are magically transported to several dark periods in the world history and left to experience the pain, fear, isolation and ultimately the triumph of these soldiers’ lives.
When American Sniper opened in theaters January 2015, the world was shocked and excited that a film about a war has finally shown the emotional and psychological pain a soldier goes through. To many this was a new concept but, what the public did not realize, was in 2014, a World War II film, Fury was released. Fury is an insightful film about a tank crew surviving through World War II through the emotional and psychological hardships. The film takes place in April 1945, five months before WWII ends (Fury, IMDb). There are many key points to which makes Fury a modern war film from the extent of backstory each character has, to the prescreening prep and training, to the research of the props. Though American Sniper and Fury differ in wars and
Sturken wrote how Oliver Stone uses his own credibility to create his films about the Vietnam War from a soldier’s perspective. With Stone’s film Born on the Fourth of July (1989) and Platoon (1986) is produced in a sense that interpreted, creates a narrative, and makes meaning of the history that has occurred in late American twentieth-century (Sturken, 65). Sturken is questioning the authenticity of Stone being a filmmaker with his status of being a historian and how the facts within the film are presented to accurately interpret of what actually happened in the past. The argument that Sturken makes about media texts and the reception films get only show a perspective from the fil...
going to compare the main characters, the location, the time they took place and the intentions of the
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Former president of the United States of America, John F. Kennedy said something that describes the true terrors of the war; “Man must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.” War is a dangerous and scary thing that many people are apart of. Usually, it is not portrayed to the public in an appropriate manner. Many times, war is showed as something that you may want to be apart of, but in reality it is a horrific event that can get you killed and scar you for life. Writing about war is usually supposed to make the readers feel the true, and indescribable horrors of the war. Regardless of the situation, when writing about war, the most effective strategy is to put the reader in the shoes of the characters to make them feel like they are there and experiencing the event. The author does this by using imagery.
The aim of this work is a comparison between the novel "Heart of Darkness" and "Apocalypse Now," Francis F. Coppola film loosely adapted from the novel by Conrad. “Apocalypse Now” was performed as film based on the text of Conrad and placing it in the context of the Vietnam War. Although several elements were added, such as characters and situations that are not in the text, the film reflects in many ways “Heart of Darkness” in the history and development. Adapting the work of Conrad, many abstract things that are not in the text, jump to the screen. In other words, text transformation into visual representation vision adds a vision of evil in men, the fear of death, nostalgia for the home, etc. The film has
...vie also captured the scene where Albert and the other British soldiers were gassed by the Germans using mustard gas, a chemical agent that eroded the skin causing blisters, if breathed in caused respiratory problems, and if it had contact with the eyes it would cause blindness for a period of time. Injured soldiers would have to be carried to medic areas that were understaffed and largely improvised so disease would spread if the surgeons were not careful. This movie portrayed these scenes as close to the real thing as possible. It showed the viewer that the First World War was brutal and survival was very difficult which made the reunion between Joey and Albert that much more powerful. The movie War Horse is extremely historically accurate and, in the three scenes that I have chosen, the movie was able to correctly portray how the conditions and battles were like.
Romeo and Juliet, a story of a tragic romance between two young lovers. And within the story you find that it is different from the book to the movie. While reading the book you notice some differences between it and the movie. While watching the movie you see one difference and it is that instead of swords like the book they have guns and they called them swords. They did this as a result of the movie is in a more modern time than the book. Another difference is when Mercutio is making Romeo go to the party. In the book he talks him into going to the party. In the movie Mercutio made him take a tablet or pill of some kind to make him go. Still the same as the other difference, still in a more modern era.
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
Q6: Throughout the film situations of conflict tend to arise, how do you portray the feelings of the characters?
Tropic thunder is an action comedy film within a film about a series of freak occurrences, which forces a group of prima donna actors to become the soldiers they’re portraying. In addition, the plot of the film revolves around these actors who are making this fictional film called “Tropic Thunder” which is about the Vietnam War and they’re experiences. The film is ultimately making fun of Hollywood in a comical way. However, in the film the actors are unexpectically dropped in the middle of the jungle and they’re forced to depend on their acting skills to survive many life and death situations. Underneath the hilarity of the film lies a message not just about the lengths that actors will go for an Oscar but to be your authentic self and everything will work out. The movie also exploits the stereotypical American “Celebrity “. When comparing the film within the film we can clearly see the difference in the acting and filming choices. Throughout the film the audience can see the obvious insecurities within these actors. In addition, throughout the film, the characters portray themselves to be someone else to prevent from displaying who they really are. Once they eventually reveal their true self, their relationships with each other changes. There are many similarities and differences between the film and the “making of the film” such as, acting, shot types and overall film choices.
“Entertainment has to come hand in hand with a little bit of medicine, some people go to the movies to be reminded that everything’s okay. I don’t make those kinds of movies. That, to me, is a lie. Everything’s not okay.” - David Fincher. David Fincher is the director that I am choosing to homage for a number of reasons. I personally find his movies to be some of the deepest, most well made, and beautiful films in recent memory. However it is Fincher’s take on story telling and filmmaking in general that causes me to admire his films so much. This quote exemplifies that, and is something that I whole-heartedly agree with. I am and have always been extremely opinionated and open about my views on the world and I believe that artists have a responsibility to do what they can with their art to help improve the culture that they are helping to create. In this paper I will try to outline exactly how Fincher creates the masterpieces that he does and what I can take from that and apply to my films.