Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stand your ground law essay
Essays on the stand your ground law
Essays on the stand your ground law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stand your ground law essay
Zach Heyerhoff
Mr. Kadlec
Advanced Composition
26 March 2017
Stand Your Ground Law One of the most recent, debatable topics in the United States today has become the Stand Your Ground Law. Although it is sometimes misunderstood, the basic definition of the law allows for the use of deadly force when being attacked without first having to retreat. When it comes to public opinion, middle ground does not exist between the advocates for the law, or the critics against it. The drastically different opinions of staunch critics and fervent advocates of the Stand Your Ground Law have made this a very controversial and divisive topic. Many people may have a misunderstanding of this new law which leads to frequent debates. Stand Your Ground Law states
…show more content…
This means that if a person faces danger, he or she may prevent it from happening by using force without having to retreat first. But in states that do not have Stand Your Ground Laws, a person must first try to escape the threat of danger, or retreat, in order to use deadly force. But some people still do not have a clear idea of what the law actually entails. According to Bradford Cohen, many people wrongly believe that the Stand Your Ground defense has only paved the way to “a free-for-all shooting gallery” (1). However, in reality, this law only states that if you feel that you face grave danger, you may use deadly force to defend against it without having to run and hide first. John Hay Rabb suggests that many supporters of Stand Your Ground Laws are reasonable, law-abiding, responsible citizens who happen to own guns (1). Advocates of the law agree with Rabb, and say they need this law because it makes them feel …show more content…
Even though many misunderstandings and disagreements about the Stand Your Ground Law exist, several states have adopted the law. Yet people on both sides of this issue will probably always find it hard to agree with a different perspective about it than their
Ms. Hasselstrom has ethical appeal because she used credible personal situations to support her authority to possess a gun. Because she was such a peace-loving woman, carrying a gun would be a fallacy. Her stated cause and effects gave this article logical appeal on the subject of carrying guns for safety purposes. Although she establishes good logical appeal, she failed to include statistics that could have made her argument more credible.
One of the most disturbing trends in American policing in recent years has been the militarization of police weaponry and tactics. In his new book, “The Rise of the Warrior Cop”, author Radley Balko traces the roots of American law enforcement from the constables of colonial times to present day SWAT teams and special response units. With the high controversy surrounding the “war on drugs” and the “war on terrorism,” policymakers have signed off on a dangerously aggressive style of policing that too often leads to unnecessary deaths and injuries. Some people say that modern law enforcement is on a collision course with our Bill of Rights and is unconstitutional. In the book “ Rise of the Warrior Cop” the author talks about how modern day policing are adapting mostly all military tactic. These wars are more than just metaphors designed to rally public support and secure all the money they can to support these programs. They change the way we think about what the police do. Wars mean shooting first and asking questions later. Wars require military tactics and weaponry. Wars mean civilian casualties. Are we at war with our own people?
The next cartoon I have shows a man defending his actions of shooting another person by saying that he felt threatened. He argues that Florida’s Stand Your Ground law gives him the right to do so and that the victim would also agree but the twist is that the victim is actually dead and would not be able to say otherwise. I think the artist created this illustration to emphasize how ri...
The merits of both the adversarial and inquisitorial system will be explored throughout this paper. The Australian rule of law best describes as all law should be applied equally and fairly. The five vital operations of the rule of law includes fairness, rationality, predictability, consistency, and impartially. The adversarial system adopts these operations by having a jury decide on the verdict and the judge being an impartial decision maker. In contrast, the inquisitorial system relies heavily on the judge. This can result in abusive power and bias of the judge when hearing evidence and delivering verdicts. The operations of the rule of law determine why the rule of law is best served by the adversarial system in Australia.
The stop-and-frisk policy could be considered a big controversy facing New York in recent times. The whole concept behind this stopping-and-frisking is the police officer, with reasonable suspicion of some crime committed or about to be committed, stops a pedestrian, questions them, then if needed frisks the person. This policy started gaining public attention back in 1968 from the Terry v. Ohio case. A police officer saw the three men casing a store and he believed they were going to rob the store; this led to him stopping and frisking them. After frisking them, he found a pistol and took the weapon from the men. The men then cried foul and claimed they were unconstitutionally targeted and frisked.
One of the most important amendments in the United States Constitution and which is also part of the Bill of Rights is the Fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment protects people from being searched or arrested by police officers or any law enforcement without a reason. An officer may confront you and ask to search your house but if they don’t have a search warrant, they cannot legally pursue it without good reason and permission from a judge. Now what happens when a person is being arrested? Does the police or any law enforcement need a search warrant? The answer to that question would have to be no. This is where “Search incident to arrest” comes into play. Search incident to arrest (SITA), which could also be called the Chimel rule, is a
Evidence can prove that Miranda Rights should be an important right for the citizens of the United States Of America but should not be a digression or inconsequential and that shows Equality,liberty and justice. If we didn't have miranda rights we would end in a deleterious situation which would end in disaster for example, the police requirement to remember few amendment portrayed to Miranda Rights to recommend citizens that are inculpable to go to jail by police who can fabricate the situation.Evils don't have rights for other citizens like Paris which some of the victims have to be interrogated for a few days. “The Miranda warning prevents police from taking advantage of suspects who have been arrested or are in police custody. The Miranda Court determined that these protections were necessary to
The First Amendment is what we chose because it covers good areas (topics) that are occurring in the world on a daily basis. Many people like the items that The First Amendment covers, and some people don't like them. Either way there are many other amendments that have been ratified by the two-thirds of the House and Senate. There are ten amendments in the constitution, but there are 17 other amendments that aren't in the constitution. Therefore, in total there are 27 amendments.
Stand-your-ground Law - "Stand-your-ground Law." Wikipedia. The World of the. Wikimedia Foundation, 28 Mar.
Know facts about 'stand your ground' laws before facing decision, legal experts say. (2013)“Critics of "stand your ground" laws, which exist in 22 states, are creating pressure to revisit legislation. Those who argue against the effectiveness of the laws say they create more conflict, violence and use of deadly force, Carlson said. Still, supporters of the "stand your ground" laws say they deter crime and permit a person to avoid being robbed, mugged or assaulted, he said. ”Carlson said that there will be strong efforts in Georgia to reconsider the legislation, which was enacted in 2006 but that the majority opinion of the state Legislature will likely be not to change the
principle differentiating the two is the intent of the perpetrator of either an assault or battery. A
Skolnick, J., Fyfe, J. (1993) Above the law: Police and the Excessive use of force. United States: The Free Press
For many years the public has had their own views and beliefs about the concept of the use of force when used in certain situations by law enforcement officers. The Association of Chiefs of Police describes the use of force as “ The amount of effort required by police to compel compliance by a unwilling subject”. According, to the National Institute of Justice the use of force should only be used in certain necessary situations. Such as, self defense and/or in defense of another person or a group. In the case Tennessee v. Garner the U.S. supreme court ruled that a “police officer who has a probable cause to believe that a suspect poses a threat of serious harm to the officer or others may use deadly force to prevent escape”. There are many
“A person should be able to defend him or herself if the person believes the he or she is about to be attacked (even if it has not yet occurred but an approaching individual is making threats.)”
Self-defense could only be used if the actions were used to defend oneself. Those actions must be necessary. The use of force by that individual must match the force used by the attacking force. For example, if Joe attacks Ryan with a knife, Joe is legally able to defend himself with deadly force. Joe cannot continue to use deadly force, when the attacking force is disabled.