Inductive Reasoning Pros

1600 Words4 Pages

Inductive Reasoning Kills Dozens “Excuse me, miss, can I see your license and registration, please?” Great. Pulled over once again, except this time I don’t even know what I did wrong. Apparently I made an unsafe lane change that resulted in an improper U-turn. I tried asking the officer what I did wrong, but as soon as I began speaking, he started talking over me. “Are you even from around here?” he asked me. “You look like you should’ve never even gotten your license.”
“Yes, sir. I live here and make this turn every day. I’m not sure what I did wrong this time,” I responded in my most innocent voice. All three times I had been pulled over prior to that day, I managed to get out of getting a ticket. This police officer, however, was not …show more content…

In this passage, Schulz explores the pros and cons of inductive reasoning, which she describes as “the strategy of guessing based on past experience.” She then goes on to say that this strategy is very helpful because it helps us come to conclusions much faster. Usually, these conclusions we come to are correct. However, when we make bad assumptions, inductive reasoning can be very dangerous. To extend her argument, Schulz discusses multiple examples of induction gone wrong. She talks about how stereotypes are formed due to leaping to conclusions, a bias of inductive reasoning. Along with this, Schulz brings up how induction is also responsible for the continuation of stereotypes. Also, Schulz brings up the fact that sometimes evidence can be looking us right in our faces, yet we will ignore it or distort it in order to hold on to our previously made conclusions. This is known as confirmation bias, which is “the tendency to give more weight to evidence that confirms our beliefs than to evidence that challenges them.” This is the downfall of inductive reasoning; it’s not perfect, and we’re bound to be wrong at least some of the …show more content…

In the videos all over the news and internet we have seen numerous cases of innocent lives of black people in the United States being taken. It was found that “nearly 1 in 3 black people killed by police in 2015 were identified as unarmed, though the actual number is likely higher due to underreporting” (“Police Killed More”). While about 33% of victims have been unarmed, for some reason these officers’ first instincts were to pull out their guns and shoot. These instincts are likely attributed to these officers’ past experience with violent black criminals; yet, what about their experiences with violent white criminals? Why don’t we hear about innocent, unarmed white lives being taken by the police force? It’s because it’s much less likely to happen. According to 2015 reports, unarmed blacks were killed five times faster than whites (“Police Killed More”). Also, based on a project by The Guardian, “black males between the ages of 15 and 34 are nine times more likely to be killed by police than any other demographic” (Craven). This evidence shows that safe to say that because there aren’t really any stereotypes on white people to be violent, the officers don’t initially think to pull out their guns and shoot. Stereotypes attached to young black males such as being violent thugs and criminals are the only logical explanation or excuse for

Open Document