Importance Of Organizational Analysis, Task Analysis And Person Analysis

1245 Words3 Pages

It is essential that excellent management theories can be implemented so that they do not compromise management policies (Ghoshal 2005). Organizational Analysis, Task Analysis and Person Analysis can be used to identify the role/roles that need to be filled, how they will do it and who will do it so that the company can reach the organizations strategic goals and business objectives. Organizational Analysis is generally conducted by mid-level to senior management and is involved with the direction of training by the analysis of environmental factors, working resources and internal resources e.g. Balanced Scorecards. Managers must make sure that there is a good organizational climate, reward systems and appropriate efficacy measures (Amna, Sumaira 2012). This form of analysis has been shown to prove its self very useful in the case of Calabrese & Spadoni‘s (2013, pp. 6594-6606) organizational analysis into service productivity and perceived service quality study of European Banking Groups.
Task Analysis incorporates all aspects of the jobs description e.g. major tasks to knowledge and skills via the frequency, importance and difficulty of the task. It analyses what an employee is required to do in terms of physical actions to cognitive processes that must be done to complete the necessary task (Amna, Sumaira 2012). Task Analysis can be very handy when trying to understand the current system and the information that flows within it. This makes this process crucial when attempting to implicate new policies. Allan et al (2014, pp.93-112) examined the importance of understanding organizational change in a study of three primary care settings in England. The study’s data collection involved three group interviews with 32 service users...

... middle of paper ...

...nt laws there are still gaps in employment opportunities and even wages.
In conclusion, training and development have been seen as a vital component in the organization’s investment for the future, particularly in Australia due to dangerously low levels of skilled workers as reflected in many studies and this literature review. Hinterhuber & Popp produced a very interesting spin on the idea of knowledge as an inbuilt mechanism for success however the overwhelming amount of evidence pointed to cumulative processes. Put most simply training and development is a complex web of theories and laws that dictate the level of available education. When organizations invest in improving the knowledge and skills of its employees, the investment is returned in the form of a more productive and effective workforce that is capable of reaching organizational goals and objectives

Open Document