Importance Of Micro-Level Interaction

975 Words2 Pages

Even though many aspects of sociology deal with macro-level issues, micro-level interactions are just as important. This chapter discusses the development of self, social interaction, and the social structures present in society. Charles Horton studied the development of self and created the concept of the looking-glass self. This concept states that humans develop a self-image that reflects how others see them. They think about this outside perspective, or how others react to certain behaviors and present themselves accordingly. Does this mean we form our own identity, or do others form it for us? Theories such as Horton’s stress the importance of children surrounding themselves with positive peers. Another micro-level sociologist is …show more content…

One goes through socialization their entire life, but it can be divided into childhood and adult socialization. Childhood socialization begins with primary socialization. Here, children acquire social norms and values from their parents and other caregivers. Parents also provide anticipatory socialization, which teaches children what will be expected of them in life. Examples range from expectations held when a child begins school to when they begin adulthood. Peers also influence a great deal of socialization and often times, peer norms and values can conflict with those taught by parents. Other influences include gender, mass media, and consumer socialization. Adult socialization is slightly less complex. It typically revolves around the work place. Adults need to resocialize to work environments when getting a new job. Other changes that create socialization for adults include changes in societal norms, family, aging, and geographic mobility. All of these aspects affect the self one developed throughout childhood and onto adulthood. Does this mean many aspects of one’s identity are determined by their surroundings? If so, will one ever know if they are truly being themselves or just the person their surroundings has shaped them to …show more content…

These are enduring and regular social arrangements. The smallest form is interpersonal relationships. These can be dyads, two person relationships, or triads, three person groups. An example of a triad is a couple who has a child. On a larger scale, individuals can form social networks, which are composed of two or more individuals, groups, or organizations. Social networks can come in handy when looking for jobs. Then there are groups. These are a small number of individuals who have developed a relationship based on the interactions they have had together. The three types of groups are primary, secondary, and reference groups. Primary groups are very close knit groups like a family. Secondary groups are large impersonal groups and reference groups are groups one uses to evaluate themselves. Each group is important in their own way, but considering the consumption society of the United States, reference groups can have a lot of influence. If one compares themselves to the rich and famous, they may develop different values than those around them. Even comparing oneself to friend’s “front stage” self on social media can cause distorted values and norms. Sociologists focus on relationships like these and how an individual’s development of self shapes their role in

Open Document