Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature vs nurture in criminal mind
Nature vs nurture in criminal mind
Effects of crime on children and young peoples development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature vs nurture in criminal mind
Hypotheses
If culture is the determinant of criminal behavior like murder, at least, one of these would be true:
1. Christian kids who migrate to the United-States most violent cities, like, Chicago, start to commit crime at a much high rate. I think it is important to take heed of religious kids who suddenly starts to behave in criminal activities by being in a violent surrounding because, it will allow me to conclude that it is the culture that turns them violent, obviously.
2. Teenagers who come from affluent families and spend countless times watching violent scenes in television, commit murder at a higher rate as low income teenagers. The reason why I make affluent kids the group study in my research, and not otherwise expected, is because it will give me a better understanding of the impact of violent scenes on children 's behavior directly. When kids come from a family that can satisfy their needs, it gives them less incentives to commit a crime. Poor kids may engage in criminal activities that may led the researcher to infer that it is because of excessive contact with violent scenes in TV, but it may otherwise be because these kids parents can support them financially, therefore,
…show more content…
In the process of trying to respond to the question posed in my research, it is vital that I take into consideration these two forces that profoundly influence human tendencies: nature and nurture. Clearly, I think cultures have an impact on human behavior. But, I -- in my research -- just want to figure out to what extent do cultures dominate our behavior. If my research is successful, then as an society we will need to discuss the kinds of culture that we impose on our children, and the repercussion of these cultures. And, most importantly, we can start having conversations on how this culture can be the determinant of criminal behavior in
Finding strong evidence surrounding this topic could be significant to reducing crime rates and addressing the public health issue. What I have learn from research-based evidence and analyzing social and cultural theories, is that criminal behavior is multifaceted and is influenced by a range of determinants in which surrounds the nature versus nurture debate. I believe that nature and nurture both play significant roles to the making of a criminal.
There are many theories that can be applied to different cases that have occurs in Americas history. The two theories that are choses for this paper are the trait theory and under the trait theory is psychological which is “abnormal personality and psychological traits are the key to determinant of anti-social behavior. There is a link between mental illness, personality disorders and crime (Siegel, 2014). The second theory is the Choice theory which “criminals weigh the cost and benefits and make a conscious, rational choice to commit crime” (Siegel, 2014). This paper will show how a theory can be applied to a person and a crime. Some of the cases that are being presented some will not agree but up us all about the person perspective.
Before a person reaches the age of 18 they will have witnessed over 40,000 murders, and over 400,000 other acts of violence. One research study concluded that just one hour of television everyday will increase the chances of a person committing an act of violence by four times. Violence depicted in movies will leave an impression on the viewer and the feelings they had about violence will slowly and subtly begin to change as the person becomes desensitized to violence. Witnessing repeated acts of violence raises a person’s level of hostility and lowers empathy. The violence that is portrayed in movies and television has long been known to influence crime and violent behavior in our society.
In conclusion, offenders are who they are now by nurture. Although some factors of criminals with biological influences make them more likely to commit crime. However, it can clearly be seen that family and media plays a big role in influencing criminal behaviour in this era where it was proven that when violent acts are frequently observed or thought, it will increase the risk factor on normal people and even more on people with aggressive genes to commit a crime. Therefore, it can be clearly seen that the nurture of the offender outweighs their nature to commit deviant crimes.
These films have become part of American culture and are at once a representation of and possible etiologic factor in causing delinquency. Due to the relative ease of access to videocassette recorders and cable television, there is increasing evidence that the age at which youth are exposed to the movies is becoming lower. Youth learn to behave aggressively by modeling violent actors in the media (Bandura, 1986).” This is explaining how youth are easily influenced by what they see on television and also in the media. Even though parents have an effect on their children acting out, sometimes the things the children watch on television can affect the child’s behavior. A perfect example would be when children are just playing and mimicking the ‘thugs’ on television by having a fake toy gun and pretending to shoot their siblings. Cases like this later lead into the child actually turning to a lifestyle filled with guns and violence because of what took place in their childhood. With dealing with the broader outlook of juvenile delinquency within movies, one can see the correlation of sex and race within juvenile
Crime and criminalization can be ambiguous; crime is only crime until certain authorities deem the actions illegal. However, social inequalities can lead to increased crime rates, notions such as gender, age, race, and class influence crime and provide criminologist with the date to determine who is most likely to commit a crime and where.
In the eternal exploration into understanding the complex criminal mind, a multitude of theories, in the study of criminology, have flourished. Among these theories is the nature vs nurture debate, which suggest that criminal behavior is either genetically inherited or a consequence of environmental influence. These two views on criminal causation differ in many ways but they are not without their similarities.
Drugs, poverty, and an unstable home life are some of the already factors that influence violence; if the already known factors are combined with media violence, “the result is an explosion of violent crime in any nation in which it takes place” suggests Lt. Col. David Grossman (par. 3). Most people who are often exposed to violence would argue, “Not all people who are exposed to media violence are murderers.” This is true, but most murderers have had some involvement with violent video games, rap music, or television. Kids tend to mimic the actions of others whether they are good or bad. For example, if a kid witnesses someone bullying someone else, they will, more likely than not, join them. Why wouldn’t this be the same if they observed someone committing violent actions through media? Some might also argue that the murder rate has decreased throughout the years. Grossman recommended looking at the assault rate rather than the murder rate be...
Lahann, Jeff. "Does Violence on Television Influence Young People to Commit Crime." By Aurora97. N.p., 10 July 2009. Web. 06 Apr. 2014.
In this Paper, I will be exploring the myth that criminal behavior is caused by the environment in which a person grows up in. This paper will basically discuss the long-time argument of nature vs nurture. The nature theorists believe that criminal behavior is biological and inherited in genetics, while the nurture theorists believe that everyone is born the same way and the way they are raised plus the environment around them influence criminal behavior. This is relevant because it’s a very big topic not only in criminal justice, but also in psychology as it involves the way people interact within society and the development of criminal behavior. I also have always been intrigued with the nature vs nurture debate and would like to know more
Alfred Mathew, and Will Shapiro. "Effects of Television Violence on Children and Teenagers." Quarterly Journal of Economics 123.1 (2008): 48 - 63. Advanced Placement Source. EBSCO. Web. 3 Apr. 2011
Aggression is a global issue which has existed since the dawn of time. It is a natural function of human expression (Blackburn: 1993, Bowes & McMurran: 2013). It is the subsequent product of some aggression; violence which is of concern on a variety of domains.
Television violence, and media violence in general, has been a controversial topic for several years. The argument is whether young children are brainwashed into committing violent real-world crimes because of violent and pugnacious behavior exposed in mass media. In his article “No Real Evidence for TV Violence Causing Real Violence”, Jonathan Freedman, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto and author of “Media Violence and Its Effect on Aggression: Assessing the Scientific Evidence”, discusses how television violence, claimed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), does not cause real-world aggression among adolescents. The FCC determined to restrict violent television programming to late night hours only because their “scientific research” proves of increasing aggression among young viewers (Freedman Par. 2). Freedman goes on to explain that the FCC has no substantial scientific evidence stating that there is a correlation between fictional violence and real-world aggression among young audiences. He has completed research in 1984 and 2002 on the relationship between media violence to actual acts of violence on the street. Because he has completed research projects related to this topic, Freedman’s statistical evidence shows that there is a reduction in youth violence and it essentially does not cause real-world crimes (Freedman Par. 1). The FCC continues to claim that exposure to media violence does in fact increase aggression, and yet their readers continue to believe their fabrications. Freedman argues that people who research media violence tend to disregard and omit the opposing facts. No one type of violence is more effective on aggression than another type. There is no evidence showi...
Human antisocial behaviour is complex and trying to understand it has always proven to be a daunting intelligent task, especially in modern culturally diverse societies. Crime, broadly defined as behaviour through which individuals obtain resources for others through uncouth means, presents as one of the most refractory internal social dilemmas. Understanding individual criminal acts such a murder, rape or motives behind them is intricate, rather their behavioral definitions and causes offers a more clear platform for argumentative reasoning. Criminal behaviour, regardless of manner, involves use of barbaric methodologies to obtain symbolic or material resources. Criminal behavior results from methodical processes that involve intricate interactions among isolated, societal, and environmental factors in people’s lives.
of violence or tunes into their parents favorite soap opera might find an increasingly amount of exposure to violent acts and sexual content. Children are very vulnerable to such influences and often do not know the difference between right and wrong and the difference between reality and fantasy (Dritz, Russel 1996). As the years go on and television seems to be too censored to most, studies have continued to prove the increasing numbers of children associated with violence and sexual behavior. Although a seemingly older statistic, the Neilson Index averaged American children to watch 18,000 television murders before he or she graduated from high school (Tucker, Larry A. 1988). Could this be a reason for an increasing amount of murders and violent acts among children today?