Hungry For Change

739 Words2 Pages

More and more people get fat every year, money is being spent on diabetic patients and heart disease and it's just getting worse. What role should the government take while balancing individual rights and the common good? How do we stop it? Our individual rights say we have to right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and various others. But I'm focussing more on LIFE. We have the agency to choose our way of life whether you want to be fat or fit. It's the choice you make to live life.

In the movie “Hungry for Change” tells us that it is our responsibility to eat healthily and be fit. Making that extra step to ensure happiness. While in “Chew on This” tells us that the government should regulate. While we fight to solve our problem of obesity we work hard trying to find its source. Us or the companies? We both are a source and reason …show more content…

While many think it's one or the other, we should be working together. Without food companies most people would die, without people, the companies will die. While we need healthy food, some companies make healthy food. While some companies produce unhealthy options it's okay once in a while to snack out and have a treat for yourself.

I can say there is a way to achieve balance. I would rather have balance then one or the other. I think it's best that way for everyone. I like fast food, it's tasty, but to much homemade juice will scar me. While the fast food industry thrives their people don't. Mostly poor they shouldn't have to buy that instead of healthier foods. This is where the government should come in.

The government should regulate what's good or not. Drug commercials are great examples. The government makes sure people know what's wrong with the product and shares that information through the ad. The same should apply to foods with sugar in them. In both “Chew on This” and A “History of Sugar” by Newsela, say sugar sprouts addictive qualities like

Open Document