Human Rights In Australia

1070 Words3 Pages

The United Nations (UN) is defined as an intergovernmental organization missioned to encourage international cooperation and to generate and continue international order. The UN was founded in 1945 and is currently made up of 193 member states. Individuals from within the United Nations member states can bring complaints of human rights breaches to the relevant United Nations treaty body. A human rights treaty is an international agreement, which instils irrevocable obligations to protect and promote rights and freedoms on States that officially accept it, commonly through “ratification” or “accession”. The treaties are missioned with monitoring implementation in States parties of the rights set forth in the treaties and with deciding on …show more content…

It may take time for the UN to address the complaints because of the backlog of complaints because the UN is under resourced as it is funded by the member states. There have been many successful individual complaints where the states have resolved the human rights issue that the individual was facing. Australia itself has had a few complaints about their human rights.
Australia is a party to the seven core international human rights treaties; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities …show more content…

26th of November 2001 was when Adel Tebourski was arrested in France in connection with the killing of an Afghani military figure. He was tried before the Paris Criminal Court and on 17 May 2005 and he was sentenced to imprisonment for six years and removal of certain civil rights for five years. By decree of 19th of July 2006 he was dispossessed of his French nationality and an order for his deportation was issued. Tebourski then applied for asylum in France on 25th of July 2006. His application was rejected on the 28th of July 2006. He immediately appealed to the Refugee Appeals Board. On the 27th of July 2006 the UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) requested that France refrain from deporting Tebourski until it had considered his complaint. Nevertheless, Tebourski was deported to Tunisia on the 7th of August 2006 following a series of unsuccessful appeals in France. The Committee against torture noted France’s justifications for its deportation of Tebourski despite its request that his deportation be stayed. Article 3 rights applied to all, regardless of a person’s character. In failing to comply with the request for interim measures, France had violated Tebourski’s rights under Articles 3 and 22 of the CAT and was required to take measures to amend contravention of Article 3, and to consult with Tunisia on Tebourski’s

Open Document