Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature in post - wwii
Literature after the second world war
World war ii us literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
John Evergreen wrote “La Guerre de L'humanité” while fighting in world war II where he was shot and died. Evergreen writes “La Guerre de L'humanité” in hopes to depict to the world just how gruesome and violent war actually is, in hopes to end war. He describes war with no filter leaving every detail visible to the naked eye. He wants to share the belief that, war is unethical and can change humanity in horrific ways, with the use of vivid imagery, the strong symbolism, and the dark connotation. The imagery of the war creates a strong picture in the reader's mind. “Men lie, covering dirt”, this line of poetry allows the readers to go into the war and picture the events going on. Evergreen much like Wilfred Owen writes with such strong imagery to allow the reader to explore the poem with all five senses, in doing so the readers will get to hear, see, taste, feel, …show more content…
“A massive pride marches towards the crippled men”. Evergreen uses the word “pride” to symbolize lions. Lions represent strength and independence, this sheds a new light on this line of poetry as it depicts the dominance of the “enemy”. Another example of symbolism is the line “Men lie, covering dirt”, although this line includes imagery, it also contains symbolism, as the line emphasizes the dirt, which as a result devalues the humans. This is significant because the dirt represents war and violence and how during such time no human life is more valued than the actual act of violence, humans are not as important than the whole of the army. Lastly, the war in itself is an example of symbolism as the war symbolizes the destruction of humanity and the evil tendencies of mankind. This idea of excessive violence is exactly what Evergreen was going for while writing this poem. It allows the readers to fully understand what soldiers and actual people go through during such a dark
Every place that is mentioned in the poem is a well-known bloody fight in wars that claimed many lives. The opening stanza of the poem is a command from the grass to soldiers at war in Austerlitz and Waterloo to kill as many people as they can and shovel them under the grass so that it has enough history to pile under itself and wipe out all the marks of combat. Austerlitz is a village where on Dec. 2, 1805; Napoleon escorted an outnumbered French army to vic...
Vivid imagery is one way with which writers protest war. Crane uses imagery to glorify, and shortly thereafter demean and undercut war, through the use of imagery, by placing positive and negative images of war close to eachother. “Blazing flag of the regiment,” and “the great battle God,” are placed before “A field where a thousand corpses lie.” (A) These lines’ purposes are to put images into the reader’s head, of how great war may appear, and then displaying that there are too many casualties involved with it. In Dulce Et Decorum Est, a man is described dyin...
This poem dwells heavily on the problems in war. It describes how high the death toll is for both sides. Slessor uses “convoys of dead sailors” to show that all these dead body’s are very much alike, with their movements and feelings being the same. It also outlines a major problem in war, being able to identify and bury they dead properly. "And each cross, the driven stake of tide-wood, bears the last signature of m...
Even though the war is over, it is still remembered. There seems to be diminished optimism and no smiles are evident as the season of autumn is underway. The first line of the poem is conflicting in the language and visual on “By the road to the contagious hospital”. A hospital should be a place of healing but sickness is implied which provides uncertainty. The feeling of cold and misery can be felt from the movement in the sky as quoted “under the surge of the blue/ mottled clouds, driven from the/ northeast- a cold wind…” (Ln 2-4) which provides a mood of anxiety and expectations. . A chilly reception could be received by the soldiers upon returning home as those left behind cannot relate or imagine what they’ve endured. The depiction of, “…muddy fields brown with dried weeds, standing and fallen” (Ln 5-6) feels gloomy with reminders of the soldiers that have fallen in battle. Welcoming home the servicemen and visiting them in hospitals or in rehabilitation facilities can be quite traumatic for all those touched by warfare. The reader is reminded that the journey is tough when images of the past events penetrate thoughts. In addition the brown landscaping is mundane, depressing and all encompassing. However, “the scattering of tall trees” (Ln 8) provides a glimmer of a future as the trees provide a vision of rising above
In this poem people can see the horror of the names on the wall, and the experiences that one who has been in war has to live with. In this poem we feel the experience of the war and toward the end, we see him staring at a soldier with a missing arm
Firstly I will be exploring metaphor as it is used so much in this poem. The first metaphor which I will examine is “Haunting Flares” on line 3 of the first stanza. This quote has so many connotations, my first opinion on this was that the flares which the enemy are firing to light up the battlefield are said to be representing the souls of the soldiers fallen comrades. This could also be said to represent the power the enemy has on their own mortality as the bright flares would light up the battle-field exposing everything to their view, this indicates that the enemy always seem to have power upon the soldiers, almost godly. The second metaphor which I will explore is: “An ecstasy of fumbling” in line one of the second stanza.
The three narratives “Home Soil” by Irene Zabytko, “Song of Napalm” by Bruce Weigl, and “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen all have the same feelings of war and memory, although not everyone experiences the same war. Zabytko, Weigl, and Owen used shifting beats, dramatic descriptions, and intense, painful images, to convince us that the horror of war far outweighs the devoted awareness of those who fantasize war and the memories that support it.
The poem comprises three stanzas which are patterned in two halves; the rule of three is ingeniously used throughout the poem to create tension and show the progression of the soldiers’ lives. There is a variety of rhyming schemes used – possibly Duffy considered using caesural rhyme, internal rhyme and irregular rhyme to better address the elegiac reality. The rhythm is very powerful and shows Duffy’s technical adroitness. It is slightly disconcerting, and adds to the other worldly ambience of the poem. Duffy uses a powerful comparative in each stanza to exemplify the monstrosity and extent of war, which is much worse than we imagine; it develops throughout each stanza, starting with a syntactical ‘No; worse.’ to ‘worse by far’ and ending on ‘much worse’. Similarly, the verbs used to describe the soldier’s shadow as he falls shows the reader the journey of the shadow, as if it’s the trajectory of soldiers’ lives. At first, the shadow is as an act...
Owen presents us a sarcastic view towards the idea of being honorable to sacrifice for their country and buttresses it with abundant of horrific images. It is a war sonnet that captures the feelings of survivors to those who lost their lives in war. The use of a sonnet creates a sense of intensity in his poem, briefness and portrays the nature of death on a battlefield. Moreover, Owen uses the rhyme scheme of “ababcdcdeffegg” to show the strong division between the lines. The choice of a sonnet allows Owen to convey his message effectively and remain emotional to keep the readers interested. His tone in the poem is gloomy and proposes the reader to consider the question at the beginning of the poem: “What passing-bells for these who die as cattle” (1). Their deaths are significant to those of cattle and it occurs in masses. This leads the reader to consider t...
Both poems used different techniques to stimulate the readers’ evaluation and realisation of the adverse outcomes of war, especially its effects on the soldiers. Sassoon’s poem title gave the reader an immediate conclusion about the contents of the poem of the hardship that the soldier faced, which brought upon his suicide. Whereas Owen’s gave the opposite impression at first, as the Latin saying translates into “it is fitting and honourable to die for your country.”
Chaos and drudgery are common themes throughout the poem, displayed in its form; it is nearly iambic pentameter, but not every line fits the required pattern. This is significant because the poem’s imperfect formulation is Owen making a statement about formality, the poem breaks the typical form to show that everything is not functioning satisfactorily. The poem’s stanza’s also begin short, but become longer, like the speaker’s torment and his comrades movement away from the open fire. The rhyming scheme of ABABCDCD is one constant throughout the poem, but it serves to reinforce the nature of the cadence as the soldiers tread on. The war seems to drag on longer and longer for the speaker, and represents the prolonged suffering and agony of the soldier’s death that is described as the speaker dwells on this and is torn apart emotionally and distorts his impressions of what he experiences.
In conclusion, Owen only loosely bases the structure of this free-verse poem on the iambic pentameter. The comparison of the past and the present emphasizes on what the soldier has lost in war. There are several recurring themes shown throughout the poem, such as reminiscence and sexual frustration. Reminiscence is shown through the references to his life before the war, while sexual frustration is depicted through the unlikeliness of a girl ever loving him due to his disability. The message that Owen is trying to get across to his readers is the falseness of war propaganda and pacifism – what war can do to one - and he conveys his ideas using various themes, language and through the free-verse structure of this poem.
The poet uses careful expression and intense figurative language to emphasizes that war is always horrifying. The use of extremely graphic imagery furthermore, adds weightage to his argument. Through the effective use of all three of these tools, the poem conveys a strong meaning and compelling argument that the war is not as heroic as the Defence propaganda make it to be. The poem's use of precise wording
War consumes the youth of young men and completely alters a person. From numerous poems, it is made clear that war exhausts the youth of young men, and has left their lives with no meaning. These poems are “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and “Mental Cases” written by Wilfred Owen. Similarly, they both employ the same techniques, such as similes and metaphors. However, a somewhat different perspective is projected through the poem “In Flanders Field” by John McCrae, which dissimilitudes yet intensifies the main message. Whether from a more emotional perspective or from a physical view, war has devastated the prime time of many young men in multitudinous ways.
In this comparative piece on these two anti-war sonnets, from World War One and the Battle of Vinegar Hill, I will attempt to explain how each writer displays the particular event in their poetry. Both these poems have irregular rhyme schemes and around 10 syllables on each line. The aim of these poems is to remind us to respect those men who lost their lives in battle, and how disgraceful war really is. In Anthem for Doomed Youth, Owen splits his sonnet into two stanzas, an octet and a sestet. The octet describes the imagery of the battlefield and the trenches on the front line.