More handpicked essays just for you.
Federalism in canada in easy words
How will globalization impact Canada
The impact of globalization on Canada
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During his budget speech of 1998, Finance Minister Paul Martin believed that the Canadian budget, while important, was not the only aspect of Canada that was important. He believed that "there is more to taking care of a nation than simply taking care of the books. Canada is not just a market place. It is a community "(qdt. In Campbell 261). Martin was referring to the affects of globalization within Canadian society and economy, believing that we could shape these aspects without them being fully influenced by global markets. In essence, we would thrive in the global marketplace without losing our sense of a Canadian community. Globalization is a force that has affected both unitary and federal systems around the world. Individual states have adapted to trade within these international markets in order to experience economic prosperity. While globalization has affected national economic structures, it has also taken a foothold on public policies within states. However, how these policies are affected varies from state to state. As …show more content…
Canadian economics and globalization have affected the very nature of the long-standing federal government commitment towards equalization payments. While provincial governments have autonomy over their social programs, there is still some national disparity that occurs between provinces. Funding disparities would occur without the proper mechanisms in place to prevent disparities, as oil rich Alberta has greater economic power than the smaller economies of the Maritime Provinces. These differences in provincial economics have lead to the federal equalization payments. These payments are part of the 1982 Constitution act, and allows for transfers to provinces "whose fiscal capacities fall below a representative national standard" (Brown
There are many more examples of conflicts between Trudeau's thoughts and his actions. For instance, Trudeau has always been uncomfortable with excessive state intervention in the economy. For this reason he has consistently opposed the imposition of price and income controls. But this did not stop him from deciding, in 1975, that a lack of responsibility on the part of business and labour necessitated the introduction of a controls system. Trudeau has spoken of the need for a shift of emphasis in Canadian society from consumption to conservation. And yet, he allowed energy-conservation measures in Canada to fall far behind those of the United States. More than a few times, Trudeau has insisted that it is our moral obligation as Canadians to share our wealth with poorer nations. Nevertheless, he still reduced foreign-aid spending and even put a protective quota on textile imports from developing countries. Trudeau has written about the importance of consensus in government. But again, this did not prevent him, on more than a few occasions, from entirely disregarding the consensus of his cabinet ministers on a given issue, preferring instead to make the decision on his own.
"Prime Minister Promotes Open Federalism." Prime Minister of Canada. N.p., 21 Apr. 2006. Web. 15 July 2014. .
In his introduction, Raphael purposes that it is highly unlikely for Canada as an industrialized nation to have such a great amount of citizens in poverty, he also points out how pa...
McQuaig is a notable journalist and a writer, who has written a number of books on the state of affairs that Canada’s economy is. Unlike her previous books that she has written ,discussing deficit reduction and cuts to social programs among others, this time she drifted away from the specifics and focused on our general view and acceptance of the economic processes. In the book, she attacks nation’s political passivity and acceptance of the believed fact that the domestic economy fully depends on the global market situation and that is should follow the trends. Trapped in this view, governments act as a victims to the global economic process and accepts an its people and impose this view on the electorate.
The Feds then distribute this money to the provinces by the way of transfer payments or as targeted funding for specific programs and without this influx of cash, the provinces would have a significantly smaller bank account to deal with, thus decreasing their given power. Politics are based fundamentally on strategy and what better of a tactic than to include strings attached to the payment? The prime minister has the capability to set conditions that certain provinces must meet in order to obtain federal money. This gives the PM a high degree of influence over the provinces and allows them to set the broad guidelines that the provinces must
“Parliament and the government of Canada are committed to the principle of making equalization payments to ensure that provincial governments have sufficient revenues to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation.”
The welfare state and creation of social programs such as health care, resulted in the transferring of funds from the federal government to the provincial governments in order to sustain provincial services (Young, Blais & Faucher, 1984). These transfers have elicited the demand for grants and has given provinces power within taxation spending; a responsibility given to the federal government through the pragmatism of the Constitution by means of federal spending powers (Watts, 1999). This power to demand funds has severe repercussions in terms of conflict between the federal and provincial government; ten provincial legislatures fighting one national legislature. Thus, the more power over policy and socioeconomic interests that provinces have regarding their economies and region it allows for their ability to shape themselves and articulate as well as enhance their interests towards Ottawa. Through this, it becomes evident that the providing of social services to everyone in Canada on the basis of equality of opportunity, and equality of distribution has resulted in provinces using this to their own advantage to enhance the building of their
National economies are extremely complex. The level of economic development is the major indicator of the place that the country stands on the international economic scene or economic staircase. Many factors are responsible for economic growth and sustainability as well as for crisis and disruption. Nowadays, all the countries of the globe are interconnected and closely intermingled with each other in the net of international economic relations due to globalization. Therefore, Canadian citizens should prevent the gap between rich and the poor to make Canada a greater society.
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Alternative Federal Budget 2011, Report: Rethink, Rebuild, Renew (pg. 69, 70, 72, 75) Retrieved from: http://www.policyalternatives.ca/AFB2011
Primary activities such as forestry, fishing, and farming account for the greatest percentage of national income (source). Without federalism, the resources that come from rainforests, prairie farmlands, tundra and a mineral-rich shield would all be separate. The disadvantage of federalism is the economic gap between the lesser and more affluent regions of Canada, as result equalization payments assist struggling provinces to pay for social services. The advantage of an equalization payment is the allowance for provinces to level the playing field and share the same services of wealthy provinces. Manitoba Premier Howard Pawley believed that equalization payments promoted a family culture, and unity among Canadian people as well as stating “somebody’s life chances shouldn’t be determined by geography” (Howard Pawley source).
Following the Great Recession, the world has been facing complex global transformations. Dani Rodrik’s “The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy” portrays the challenges of the implications that our current model of globalization relies upon. Rodrik’s work reveals both the implications and connections of the relationships between markets, the states, and globalization in the currently changing world. Throughout the book, Rodrik argues the validity of five key points: markets require regulatory institutions, such institutions take on a variety of forms, societies should orient their market-supporting institutions to their own unique needs, markets that are responsive to democracy can avoid institutional convergence, and a world that is responsive to democracy will not reach full globalization. This book has made me question the long term sustainability of the already evolving economic globalization process. Rodrik explains that the process of globalization must be managed so that the entire world can benefit.
Globalization refers to the absence of barriers that every country had. Yes, it has helped to demolish the walls that separated us .Globalization, which is the process of growing interdependence among every country in this planet, can be seen as a sign of hopeful and better future by some, but for others it represents a huge disaster for the whole world. That’s why we are going to see the negative effect that globalization has on culture then focus on the ethical disadvantage it brought, to finally talk about the damage it did to skilled workers.
Krain, Matthew (2005), “AP Comparative Government and Politics Briefing Paper: Globalization,” [http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap05_comp_govpol_glob_42253.pdf], accessed 15 May 2012.
Globalization’s history is extremely diversified and began during the beginning of civilization. Now we live in a world that is constantly evolving, demanding people to use resources in locations that are very difficult to obtain certain resources. This could make it completely impossible to operate in these specific parts of the world. However, globalization allows people across the world to acquire much needed resources. Globalization creates the opportunity for businesses to take advantage and exploit the ability to take part of their business to a different country. Nevertheless, globalization is part of today’s society and will be involved in virtually all situations.
There is an undeniable fact that there has been a rise in globalization. It has become a hot topic amongst the field of international politics. With the rise of globalization, the sovereignty of the state is now being undermined. It has become an undisputed fact that the world has evolved to a new level of globalization, the transferring goods, information, ideas and services around the globe has changed at an unimaginable rate. With all that is going on, one would question how globalization has changed the system that is typically a collection of sovereign states. Do states still have the main source of power? What gives a state the right to rule a geographically defined region? It is believed by many that due to the introduction of international systems and increasing rate of globalization, the sovereignty of the state has been slowly eroded over time. My paper has two parts: First, it aims to take a close look at how globalization has changed the way the economy worked, specifically how it opened doors for multinational corporations to rise in power. Second, to answer the question, is it possible for it to exist today? And even so, should it?